In my educated opinion, it means that the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates, and Microsoft itself are all fronts for the Matrix. Like Apple Computers and Steve Jobs, they don't exist like we think. Microsoft would appear to be another big government entity, like Google, with a person from the families simply chosen to front it. Gates is sold to us as a genius of some sort, but I havenever seen the least evidence of that. He comes across as a big dope who can barely follow the Teleprompter or the earpiece. He is marginally more presentable than George Bush or Donald Trump, but that isn't saying much. He has all the charisma of a tuna fish sandwich left out in the rain. Which indicates he wasn't chosen for his personal qualities. He was chosen because he had to be chosen. He is a child of the richest families and demanded his “due”. These kids want to be famous, and Daddy can't say no. The only question is, will they become famous in art, cinema, politics, sports or the media? Cinema and sports were out, and you couldn't sell Gates as an artist. That left the outer reaches of the media, where Gates could be installed as a sometimes speaker and important person, without anyone ever catching on. Installing him as the front for Microsoft was a coup for his handlers, since it made that company look private: not connected to the military/industrial/spy complex. And scrubbing his genealogy hid the fact the company was closely tied to the usual families. It also allowed for the creation of the Gates Foundation, by which they could channel money to Africa, Israel, or anywhere else in the world, under the cover of a charitable foundation. But there is nothing charitable about it. It was always just a clever form of money laundering, and you can be sure every dollar spent is an investment with a huge guaranteed return and no tax. Same as all other charitable foundations.
