A reader writes: The Cassiopeans said that HAARP was not for controling the weather , that it was a mind control device . What is the images that have been seen on the radar screen ( you can see a lot of them through links from the Orbit page ) Are they perhaps 4th density “bleed through”? Because strange things seem to happen where they show up ( tornadoes , earthquakes , freak storms ).
Hi Linda!
Yes, I think you are right and I have thought the same thing. It is VERY bizarre out there in the Four Corners area, and even beyond, just as described in the session I have posted and titled “Don’t Go to Albuquerque.” (This article has been removed from the Cassiopaea website since it contained somewhat disturbing information. It can be found in the book “High Strangeness”.) I too was impressed with all the strange things showing up on radar and satellite images. Nevertheless, let’s take a look at what the Cassiopaeans have to say about HAARP but first, let’s see what they say about weather!
Session date 30 July 1994:
Q: (L) Will there be a war in the sky with the aliens?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will it be between Orions and the Federation?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will it be visible on earth?
A: Oh, yes.
Q: (L) When will this be?
A: It has already started. Will intensify steadily.Q: (L) Why are we not aware that it has already started?
A: Disguised at this point as weather. Fighting part still in other dimension. Will go to this one within 18 years. Anytime within this period. Not determinable exactly when. Could be tomorrow or 18 years.
Q: (L) 18 years from now is 2012. Is there some special significance to that time?
A: By then.
Session 7 October 1995:
A: We have message for you… Review: what did we say about weather. Why do you suppose “Opal” occurred at time, place reference point?
Q: (L) To put a stop to the UFO conference in Gulf Breeze? Does this mean we ought to stay home? (We were planning to attend a UFO conference there.)
A: Up to you, but, suggest deferment, we could tell you of titanic battle!!!!
Q: (L) So, hurricanes are a reflection of battles at higher levels? Did the good guys win?
A: Yes, but not concluded, and we fear for those drawn to locator because of sinister plans by 4th density STS.
(After hurricane Andrew occurred in 1992, and Katrina in 2005, these words take on an all-new meaning!)
Q: (L) Plans such as what? More weather phenomena or something more direct?
A: Both, several options open to them, and in works; monstrous hurricane to hit during conference, or tornado strikes Embassy Suites hotel, or bomb blast levels conference center, of mass abductions and mental controls initiated in order to cause dissention and possibly violence, followed by extreme factionalization.
(All of the above sounds strangely prescient now, after 9-11 and the increase of Earth Changes type activity.)
Session 7 January 1995:
Q: (L) We have a few interesting questions tonight. I think the first thing on everybody’s mind is the strange events during the night and early morning hours, reported by
Terry and Jan compared with events that happened that John
said that he experienced and also, Terry’s dad, and also
something woke A__ up with a start and I was awakened with
a strange feeling. We are a little bit curious about this
event, this occurrence, and we would like to have some
information on it. What exactly was it?A: Thunder.
Q: (L) It seemed to be an extraordinarily massive strike, and
it seemed to have been heard at a great distance in
several directions. Where, in fact, did this lightning
bolt strike?A: Cell was uniformly structured throughout region.
Q: (T) So we all heard that particular blast because of that?
A: No. Each zone received similar EM profile, thus one
particularly heavily charged event in each zone.Q: (L) What is an EM profile?
A: Electromagnetic.
Q: (L) Was there any particular significance to this type of
blast since it is not something any of us has
experienced in our immediate memory. Is there any
implication to this blast in terms of 4th density
activity?A: You have, and yes, as always.
Q: (L) Since this was such a boomer, what exactly was going
on on 4th density that produced a boomer like this?A: Overlapping densities, lasting approximately 1.3 seconds,
as you measure time i.e.: for 1.3 seconds, you lived
completely in 4th density.Q: (T) So this was a significant event for us to have
noticed?A: The noticing was more significant than the event.
Q: (V) Can I ask… so every time there is… am I wrong in
assuming that every time there is thunder there is a mix
of 4th density? (L) No, no. (V) It’s just this one time?
(T) What about if you didn’t notice? I didn’t hear it.
(T) What was the answer? (L) The noticing was more
important than the event. (T) So it was important that we
were aware that something had happened…A: You did at another level of consciousness.
Q: (L) Did this event have anything to do with A__’s
experience this morning of being awakened by a rustling in
her room and thinking that she heard a squeaky voice
calling her name?A: Yes.
Q: (L) Okay, what was it that she experienced?A: 4th density “resident.”
Q: (L) And what kind of 4th density resident was this?
A:
Om.Q: (L) Who is Om. (V) Is it a name? (T) Is Om the name of
the being?A: Type.
Q: (L) What is a type Om?
A: You would rather not know!
Q: (L) No, I would rather know. If something is going to be
visiting my daughter in her bedroom, I definitely want to
know who or what it is.A: Who says this will be regular event?
Q: (V) So, in other words, if it is not going to happen all
the time, don’t worry about it, is that right?A: Yes.
Q: (T) This was just a one time event?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Was the reason A__ was so aware of this is because she
is psychically open when she is asleep?A: Yes.
Q: (V) Is there anything she needs to do to control her
psychic openness in order not to be harmed?A: Why control something beneficial? […]
Q: (J) Going back to the event of this morning, when J__ related his experience of it to me, he said that when he opened his eyes that the light looked yellow… (V) I noticed the discoloration too… (J) Was that related to the event?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) What caused the light to change color?
A: Leftover 4th density effects.
Q: (L) Is this something that is going to be happening more and more as we move to 4th density?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is this electromagnetic charging of the atmosphere, I am assuming that is what it is, and that it is occurring as part of the shifting of densities…
A: Yes.
Q: (L) If it is an electromagnetic charging of the atmosphere, is this charging coming about because of this oncoming wave and effects that we are beginning to feel more and more of, are they part of the wave, its presence or approach?
A: It is a buildup, similar to the early effects preceeding the arrival of a seawave.
Q: (T) Are the extremely high winds they have been experiencing in North Carolina and California and the earthquakes in Japan all related to this?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Yes. The media is playing that down… 140 mile an hour winds up in the Carolina’s and out in California they were hitting 160 miles an hour winds. (L) Well, they told us we were going to have really weird weather.
Session date 17 February 1996
Q: (L) Can I ask my other questions? Some people on the net
want me to ask about this HAARP thing… seems to be some
sort of antennae thing…A: Disguise for something else.
Q: (L) What is that something else?
A: Project to apply EM wave theories to the transference of
perimeters.Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: If utilised as designed, will allow for controlled
invisibility and easy movement between density levels on
surface of planet as well as subterranially.Q: (L) Who is in charge of building this thing?
A: More than one entity.
Q: (L) What groups?
A: INVELCO is one guise as well as UNICON and banking
interest.Q: (L) Who is in disguise as INVELCO and UNICON? Are they
just dummy companies for cover?A: Close.
Q: (L) Can you tell us if this is a human organization or
aliens, or a combination?A: Human at surface level.
Q: (L) Is there more you can tell us about this?
A: It has nothing to do with weather or climate. These
things are emanating from 4th density, as we have told you
before.Q: (L) Is this something like a TransDimensional Atom
Remolecularizer?A: No.
Q: (L) Is is something like what you said about the whole
South West going into 4th density?A: No.
Q: (L) So, HAARP has nothing to do with the weather?
A: And also EM associated with same as reported.
Q: (L) So, when is this HAARP thing scheduled to go into
operation?A: Open.
Q: (L) Is it currently in operation?
A: Experimental.
Q: (L) How long have they been working on this thing?
A: Since the 1920s.
Q: (L) What?! The 1920s?
A: Yes.
Note: please read the entire Wave Series in order to catch up on the research that gives evidence that this assessment of HAARP – including the research done at Princeton’s “Institute for Advanced Study”.
Next:
Session date 4 May 1996:
Q: (L) Getting back to the
underground bases, is the HAARP project connected to these
underground bases.A: Not directly.
Q: (L) You once said that HAARP was something that was to be
used to “transfer perimeters.” I am assuming that this
means to manipulate space, time and density.A: Yes.
Q: Is it possible that they are planning to use this to bring
up the Atlantean crystals to utilize.A: Not so much to “bring up,” as to utilize.
Q: Is there anything to BRH’s idea about the “harmonics,”
that it must be ready to function on a certain day and
time?A: No.
Session date 9 June 1996
Q: (L) Moving along… recently I read “On the Trail of the Assassins,” by Jim Garrison, the New Orleans attorney. This is the book about his investigation into the Kennedy assassination. I know that we asked one or two questions about this earlier, but I think that now, with expanded perspective, we could ask a few more. Was the purported Cuban agenda what was really behind the assassination of JFK?
A: Not in its entirety.
Q: (L) Was there, in fact, any connection between this murder and JFK planning to reveal the government’s knowledge of alien interaction?
A: Maybe, or that was feared, based upon a sophisticated psychological profiling system.
Q: (L) One thing that we noticed was that Lee Oswald was ‘sheep dipped’ in many areas around the country, well before the election of Kennedy. Why would this be the case?
A: Consortium.
Q: (L) What was the intention in using Oswald in this way? Was it just to have a handy person around, or did they already know, in advance, that Kennedy would be elected and that they would assissinate him?
A: Time alteration.
Q: (L) Do you mean time alteration in the sense that these events did NOT actually occur at the noted times, or that they were able to go back in time and do this to put more confusion into the picture?
A: Latter, see Montauk.
Q: (L) Obviously the consortium was operationg through the FBI, the CIA, the Mafia, and God knows who else, but, can you tell us who fired the shot that caused JFK’s death?
A: No, because it would put you in grave danger.
Q: (L) Speaking of Montauk, Roxanne quoted at length some information received from some Native American about Montauk being used to change the weather on the planet, and also sending out energy waves to generate anger and other negative emotions. Is this one of the used for the HAARP assembly?
A: No.
Q: (L) Once before you said that the HAARP assembly was a continuation of the Montauk project, and was being used to ‘transfer perimeters.’ I guess this meant space/time travel, correct?
A: Yes. And resurrect Antlantean crystal principle.
Q: (L) Do they plan to actually attempt to bring up the Atlantean crystals?
A: No.
Q: (L) Do they plan to use this for mind control?
A: And other uses.
Q: (L) Can you give us a few of these uses?
A: Technical.
Q: (L) Is the HAARP assembly in operation now?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is there an estimated date of its activation?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is there anything you can tell us about when and if it will go into operation?
A: No.Session date 17 August 1996:
Q: OK, on the correlations
things, to skip from lightning to another question I just thought
of. Is there a correlation to the massive power blackouts on the
West Coast that have been happening recently, to the government
messing around with the HAARP Project, and other related weapons
testing systems?A: Not HAARP.
Q: (T) OK, not HAARP. Something else that they’re messing
with? (L) Well, why don’t we just ask, what’s the cause of the
blackouts? (T) OK, what’s the cause of the blackouts? Good
question!A: 4th density bleed through has many “fun” possibilities.
Q: (L) Oh, fun! (T) 4th density Bleedthrough? This is part of the
bleedthrough from the different bases on the West Coast?A: More or less.
Session 22 February 1997:
Q: (Laura) Ok, we have several things that we discussed earlier, is there anything you wish to say before we launch into questions?
A: Underground bases see dramatic budget increase.
Q: (Laura) Ok, why do they have a budget increase?
A: Because there is much more activity to come.
Q: (Laura) Ok, what kind of activity?
A: Broad range.
Q: (Laura) Can you list, say, the top three?
A: Experimentation, utilization and implementation.
Q: (Laura & Terry) Of what?
A: Human “resources.” Plan falling into place for “harvest.”
Q: (Terry) The new underground bases, along with all the old ones are for the coming harvest?
A: And other purposes of STS forces’ plans.
Q: (Terry) And other STS plans… (Laura) What is this thing called ‘The Harvest’?
A: What do you think?
Q: (Laura) Well, is that harvest in a negative event, or harvest in a positive one? I mean, as in the harvesting of the wheats and the tares…
A: Either/or.
Q: (Laura) Ok, now you say the plans are falling into place. What specific events of the past, say, several weeks, or months, whatever period of time set aside, are these plans that are falling into place? I mean, what’s the key in the lock?
A: Have you been paying attention, as we have always suggested you should?
Q: (Laura) Of course! I just asked you because I wanted you to enumerate! Of course I’m paying attention!
A: Lately, there has been diversion for you.
Q: (Laura) Well, it doesn’t mean I’m asleep! (Violette) Can I ask a question? If this is because there’s much more activity, and things are dramatically increasing, what has come to them, or whatever…
A: Violette mentioned the weather. Was that a bit “nippy” for you in central Europe in December and January, Arkadiusz?
Q: (Terry) V*** mentioned the weather, and the changes in it. What was the name of that movie we watched up in Tallahassee, I forgot the name of it… [Terry then spoke about a science fiction movie we saw. Aliens were here among us, and were plotting to affect the weather in such a way as to make the planet uninhabitable for us, but perfect for them. Naturally, there was secrecy and coverups. Then the subject moved to the cell phone towers that were noted in rural areas of North Florida. This then lead to a question about the cell phone towers. First part of question lost.] (Terry)…transmit to us and back… what can be transmitted? Can the negative energy be focused through these microwave towers? (V) And what was the correlation between the strange weather and the harvesting? (Laura) Because we were told that the weather changes were due to the energy buildup of the wave. That was two years ago. And it had nothing to do with the ‘harvest.’ (Terry) But it could also be that HAARP adds to it. (Jan) Ok, well, let’s ask… (Laura) Well, they would love for us to think that HAARP has something to do with weather. ‘Yes, we’re having bizzare weather. Let’s blame it on HAARP!’ because we’re going to think about HAARP… What a perfect… (Terry) Well, HAARP has a lot more to do than just the weather. They can put all the energy-based stuff that they’ve been experimenting on in one place, because they can do whatever they want, just by changing the frequencies… (Jan) Or, even just continue to mess the weather up, to continue to create negative vibrations, worry and uncertainty… (Violette) I guess the point I’m trying to get at is, are these weather changes promoting some changes in the physical body, that’s making the physical body more ‘harvestable?’ (Terry) Could very well be. (Laura) Well, it’s all interconnected, but I wouldn’t say that one is the cause of the other, just to say that they occur… (Terry) But why, as we were talking about earlier, is all this weird stuff going on all through the media?
A: We told you that “HAARP” was being designated for capturing and modulating electromagnetic fields for the purpose of total control of brainwave patterns in order to establish a system of complete “order on the surface of the planet” in either 3rd or 4th density.
Q: (Laura) Is HAARP in operation at the present time?
A: Yes, in its early stages.
Q: (Terry) Is the spreading of all these communication towers out across the country the equivalent of a HAARP program on a continental scale?
A: Back up system.
Q: (Laura) So, they don’t need the towers to operate the HAARP system, but they are there as the backup?
A: Towers serve dual and lateral purposes.
Q: (Terry) Local and regional authorities can use the towers to track people, amongst other things. (Laura) Is the weather being controlled or changed or in any way affected by HAARP?
A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.
Q: (Laura) All right, I’ll take the bait; give me the three factors, and also the fourth!.
A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chloroflorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the planet’s axis rotation orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density STS forces in a number of different ways. Be vigilant. Be observant. Be cautious in your planning and be aware. Do not let emotional anomalies cloud your knowledge base. This is not a “time” to let one’s guard down. Be especially careful of travel to unfamiliar locators, as well as sleeping in unfamiliar surroundings!!! You are being watched. Or, at least, it is best to assume you are, and act, think, and prepare accordingly. Remember what you have been warned about concerning attack. As you learn more and know more, you become more interesting… and, when your ranks swell, you are more vulnerable unless you are more aware!!
Q: (Laura) All right, were those given in the order in which they are occurring? The fourth being the one that’s coming later?
A: Maybe, but remember this: a change in the speed of the rotation may not be reported while it is imperceptible except by instrumentation. Equator is slightly “wider” than the polar zones. But, this discrepancy is decreasing slowly currently. One change to occur in 21st Century is sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages develop much, much, much faster than thought.
Session date: 19 July 1997
Q: As you know, there is a flood in Poland, and Ark has to go back, there is so much that must be done, but the government offices may be closed, the court session may be delayed indefinitely, God knows what is going to happen. What is the source of this dreadful disaster in Poland?
A: Sopophoric screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay.
Q: And what is causing these screen alterations of the magnetic belt overlay?
A: Influences of Acquiim.
Q: What is Acquiim?
A: 4th density overseer.
Q: Does that mean sporofic screen alteration?
A: Soporific/phosphorous.
Q: What is the purpose of this screen alteration?
A: Deterrence of colinear wave reading consciousness units.
Q: What is a ‘colinear wave reading consciousness unit?’
A: Suggest you “look in the mirror.”
Q: Well! I don’t know if I like being a colinear wave reading consciousness unit!
A: Why not?
Q: Because I don’t like feeling responsible for all these people who are suffering in this disaster!
A: Responsible? Are you altering the weather?[…]
Q: Well, we notice that things are really heating up. Weather, government exposure and confessions of this and that…
A: Massive alien/UFO coverage, some fictionalized, some not.
Q: Okay. I want to ask about what, precisely, this “soporific/phosphorous screen of the magnetic belt overlay” is.
A: And have you communicate it thus? No.
Q: When you said ‘colinear wave reading consciousness units,’ and ‘look in the mirror,’ was that a clue that Ark and I are mirror image consciousness units?
A: Not exactly.
Q: Well, in a previous session, you said something about being a ‘half soul,’ and my assumption was that he was a half-soul and I was a half-soul, and together we made a whole soul. But, since that time, I have wondered about this…
A: No one is unto themselves a half soul.
Q: Okay, what would give me a more clear understanding about ‘half soul balancing?’
A: The soul as read as a unit of completion. It is the communication which completes the whole in each.
Q: What are the potentials of colinear wave reading consciousness units?
A: Specifics.
Q: Well, if an overseer in 4th density wishes to prevent unification of same, there must be some reason; that there is something that the 4th density STS would not like to see happen. What is it?
A: Is that not self-evident?
Q: So, does that mean that it is important for us to be physically together to do whatever this is?
A: ‘Tis preferable.
This next session is included almost in entirety because it gives a broad overview of the entire situation:
Session date 4 July 1998
Q: (A) I am trying to write down some things about a cosmology, and I have some questions mainly about the coming events. First there was the story of the sun’s companion brown star which is apparently approaching the solar system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come?
A: Flat eliptical.
Q: (A) But how close will it come?
A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of locator of witness.
Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth… (A) Solar system… (L) Yes, but which part of the solar system? We have nine planets… which one? (A) I understand that this brown star will enter the Oort cloud… (L) I think they said it just brushes against it and the gravity disturbs it…
A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has done this on its way “in.”
Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?
A: Has passed through.
Q: (A) So, it will not approach…
A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles.
Q: (L) Well, 510 billion miles gives us some time! (A) Yes, but what I want to know… this Oort cloud is around the solar system, so this brown star, once it has passed through… (L) It must already be in the solar system? (A) No, it could have passed through and may not come closer. Is it coming closer or not? Is it coming closer all the time?
A: Solar system, in concert with “mother star,” is revolving around companion star, a “brown” star.
Q: (A) So, that means that the mass of the companion star is much…
A: Less.
Q: (A) Less?
A: They are moving in tandem with one another along a flat, eliptical orbital plane. Outer reaches of solar system are breached by passage of brown companion, thus explaining anomalies recently discovered regarding outer planets and their moons.
Q: (A) But I understand that the distance that the distance between the sun and this brown star is changing with time. Eliptical orbit means there is perihelion and aphelion. I want to know what will be, or what was, or what is the closest distance between this brown star and the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or more?
A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun.
Q: (A) Okay. Now, this closest pass, is this something that is going to happen?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) And it is going to happen within the next 6 to 18 years?
A: 0 to 14.
(That’s 2012 – and perhaps that is the real significance of that year; that the companion star will finally be seen and/or acknowledged?)
Q: (A) Okay, that’s it. I have some idea about this. Now, I understand that, either by chance or by accident, two things are going to happen at essentially the same time. That is the passing of this brown star, and this comet cluster. These are two different things?
A: Yes. Different, but related.
Q: (L) Is there a comet cluster that was knocked into some kind of orbit of its own, that continues to orbit…
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And in addition to that comet cluster, there are also additional comets that are going to get whacked into the solar system by the passing of this brown star?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) I understand that the main disaster is going to come from this comet cluster…
A: Disasters involve cycles in the human experiential cycle which corresponds to the passage of comet cluster.
Q: (A) I understant that this comet cluster is cyclic and comes every 3600 years. I want to know something about the shape of this comet cluster. I can hardly imagine…
A: Shape is variable. Effect depends on closeness of passage.
Q: (L) So, it could be spread out… (A) We were asking at some point where it will be coming from. The answer was that we were supposed to look at a spirograph.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, spirograph suggests that these comets will not come from one direction, but from many directions at once. Is this correct?
A: Very good!!!
Q: (A) Okay, they will come from many directions…
A: But, initial visibility presents as single, solid body.
Q: (A) Do we know what is the distance to this body at present?
A: Suggest you keep your eyes open!
Q: (A) I am keeping my eyes open.
A: Did you catch the significance of the answer regarding time table of cluster and brown star? Human cycle mirrors cycle of catastrophe. Earth benefits in form of periodic cleansing. Time to start paying attention to the signs. They are escalating. They can even be “felt” by you and others, if you pay attention.
Q: (L) We have certainly been paying attention to the signs!
A: How so?
Q: (L) Well, the weather is completely bizarre. The fires, the heat…
A: Yes.
Q: (L) I notice that the tides are awfully high all the time with no ostensible explanation…
A: And low, too.
Q: (L) Yes. I have noticed that particularly. (F) I have too. Not too long ago I noticed that the tides were so incredibly low for this time of year. (L) And also the signs in people – these kids killing their parents, all these people going berserk – you know…
A: Spike.
Q: (L) What do you mean spike?
A: On a graph…
Q: (L) Just spikes, not the biggie…
A: Spikes are big.
Q: …(A) I have a last question which I have prepared. So, we have these two physical disasters or events, the coming brown star and the comet cluster, but we have been told that this time it is going to be different because this time it is accompanied by a plane convergence.
A: Yes. Magnetic field alteration.
Q: (A) This plane convergence, or this magnetic field alteration, it’s supposed to be related to realms crossing or passing. A realm border.
A: Realm. What is root of “realm?”
Q: (L) Reality.
A: Yes. How does the magnetic field “plug in?”
Q: (L) Okay, in terms of these signs, these things going on on the planet, these fires and so forth – you never said anything about all these fires in Florida. You said Arizona was going to burn, but you never said Florida was going to burn…
A: We did not say it would not.
Q: (L) I know. But, it is really oppressive. I have read a couple of signs in the last day or so that we are going to have a change in the weather, a break, is my little method of predicting…
A: Reverse extreme?!?
Q: (L) Oh! Floods again! Well, I guess floods are better than fires… but, maybe not!
A: Italy and Greece are burning too.Q: (L) Yes, we noticed that in the paper today. Is there a relationship between Italy and Greece and where we are on the planet? Some kind of psychic link?
A: Just same current malady.
Q: (L) Okay, you just said we are going to have a reversal in our weather. Are there any other conditions that we should be aware of at the present time?
A: Point is to watch, look, listen.
Q: (L) When we are watching, looking and listening, is there some particular thing we are supposed to be watching for that is to give us a clue about something?
A: All.
Q: (L) Is there something we are supposed to do at some point when we perceive a particular clue or event at some point?
A: What would you suggest?
Q: (L) I don’t know that I would suggest anything except to keep a low profile and keep on working until we figure out the answer. It is like a race against time. We have to figure out the answer because, obviously, you are not going to tell us…
A: No. No race needed.
Q: (L) Well, I sometimes feel completely inadequate for all of this.
A: Stop thinking 3rd density!
Q: (L) Well, I don’t want to just live in LaLa land and say, ‘oh yes, I’m watching. I see the signs! I’m looking! I’m listening! And then count them off on my fingers and say: but I’m not gonna think about it because that’s 3rd density!’ See what I am saying here?
A: No, because you are still thinking 3rd density. Better to have a “front row seat,” and enjoy!
Q: (L) But I feel like I am not supposed to be enjoying myself so much! I feel guilty!
A: Why not?
Q: (L) Well! I’m supposed to be DOING something!
A: You are.
Q: (A) When you watch, look and listen, you are getting some signals, and these signals cause a certain pattern of thinking which were not yet able to emerge, but now, after you receive certain signals, you start to think in a different way. So, you cannot now think in a different way, but when you learn this and this has happened, then you start to think in a different pattern. So, you cannot now do things, but you always have to be ready to change your thinking at any moment when you understand more, when you see more, when you notice more, when you put things together which are not yet together. Then, there may be a big change of perspective, a total change. And this we have to keep our minds and thinking patterns open and ready to change, and work and put the puzzle and mosaic together. And, this is all that counts. It is this work that we are now doing that counts, not some future big thing: oh! Now we go on a ship! No, it is only doing our best, and what is it? Our best? It will change. I believe so. That is the idea. So, everything depends on this.
A: Yes. You see, my dear, you cannot anticipate that which is not anticipatable.
Q: (L) Well, swell. Okay, you want to stay on this subject, so let us move another step.
A: We are glad you noticed this birth of the spike.Q: (L) Is that a clue? Is this one of those obscure remarks? Yes, I noticed, the kids killing their parents, all the shooting going on, the weather… is this connected in some way to some other event?
A: 27 days of record heat out of 30, oh my oh my! Suggest you awaken your internet pals, as they are too busy chasing “goblins” to notice.
Q: (L) So, I should have something to say about this?
A: In Florida now, where to next? How about a shattering subduction quake in Pacific Northwest of U.S.? We estimate 10.4 on the Richter scale. We have warned of Ranier. Imagine a 150 meter high tsunami in Puget Sound…
Q: (L) Now, you have mentioned this earthquake. I know that you don’t usually give predictions, why have you done so now?
A: We do not give time tables.
Q: (L) Anything else other than a tsunami in Puget Sound and a big subduction quake… 10.4 on the Richter scale is almost inconceivable.
A: Ranier… caldera.
Q: (L) What about the caldera?
A: Expect one.
Q: (L) Other than floods, anything else for Florida upcoming?
A: All areas experience accelerating “freak weather patterns.”
Q: (L) Okay, all of these freaky weather patterns and bizarre things going on on the planet, how does it relate to the comet cluster and the brown star? Is it related?
A: Human experiential cycle intersects.
Q: (L) Any specifice physical manifestation of either this brown star or this comet cluster or this realm border, that is related to these events on the planet?
A: Approach of wave stimulates precursor activity which in turn causes effects which in turn stimulates further “heating up” of activity…
Q: (L) I thought it was curious that you used the term ‘birth of the spike.’ Is there something or someone that was born at that particular time?
A: No. Spike is as on a graph…
Q: (L) Okay, is there anyway we could graph this ourselves, and if so, what types of events would we include to create the background data?
A: “El Nino, La Nina,” etc…
Q: (L) Is this El Nino thing connected to sunspot cycles?
A: No.
Q: (L) It has its own cycle. I don’t think it has been tracked for long enough to get…
A: Global warming, a part of the human experiential cycle.
Q: (L) I read where Edgar Cayce said that a sligth increase in global temperature would make hurricanes something like 5 times stronger… given a baseline temperature. Does this mean we are going to have stronger and more frequent hurricanes?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will they hit land more frequently, or just spin out in the ocean?
A: Either, or. …
Q: (L) Now, when you were talking about the weather changing from one extreme to another, were you talking in a past sense or future sense?
A: Both.
Session date 24 July 1999:
Q: What’s the deal with all the recent weather activity? These terribly unusual lightning storms?
A: Increased static electricity in atmosphere.
Q: (A) Is it only in our region or all over the planet?
A: Latter.
Q: (L) Well, it all seems to be discharging over our heads! I have never witnessed such lightning.
Session date 4 December 1999:
Q: We have a number of issues to deal with this evening; the first one is the subject of Flight 990. There have been a number of scenarios suggested by the media and other sources on the internet. One of them says that the autopilot was disengaged BEFORE the plane began to dive. Is this the case?
A: No. Plane was disturbed from flight path by windburst, therefore, autopilot was disengaged in order to better combat problem.
Q: There has been a big controversy going on. One of the contributors to this controversy was Ed Dames who, on the Art Bell show, claimed that his organization “remote viewed” the situation and that there had been a fight in the cockpit. This claim was made, I believe, before the flight data recorders were retrieved. So, this was a scenario that the media picked up. Then, after one of the recorders was found, for a short while, this idea was popular, because it seemed to explain the crazy behavior of the aircraft. But then the voice recorder was found, and there was no real evidence to support the “fight” scenario, but there was a sort of prayerful exclamation heard, being made by the co-pilot who was, apparently alone in the cockpit when the activity began. Then, the pilot returned and there were sounds of desperate activity and so forth, so the next scenario proposed was that the co-pilot had decided to commit suicide in a big way. As a result of this Ed Dames episode on Art Bell, followed by the NTSB and FBI trying to fit the clues to Dames’ scenario, there is now the suggestion making the rounds of the internet rumor mongers that Ed Dames is in the employ of the “powers that be,” and that he deliberately planted this story so that they could then come along and validate it to give him more credibility so that he would be in place to plant more and greater rumors and stories of the disinformation variety. Is that the case? Did Ed Dames and his group accurately remote view the cockpit of Flight 990?
A: No. Ed was hoping for a “hit.”
Q: So, Ed Dames is NOT in the employ of the “Powers that be?”
A: No.
Q: Was the co-pilot suicidal?
A: No.
Q: So, what he said was the equivalent of “Oh my God!” or something?
A: Close.
Q: Now, I have another correspondent who was on a beach about a hundred miles west of the crash site. This individual was with a companion and they both saw an orange glow in the direction of the crash at approximately the time of the event. This orange glow was, in her opinion, anomalous, and quickly disappeared. Was what was seen by my correspondent an effect of this plane crash?
A: Possibly linked, but not likely.
Q: Well, the question now comes about the nature of the “windburst.” You previously said about this that “mysteries are subjective.” Did you mean to imply that we could have or should have followed up with questions about the windburst itself?
A: No, these things happen. Sometimes a fault in autopilot analog computer causes system to fail to adjust properly, thus causing an attitude aberration in wingtips. Planes can dive suddenly and inexplicably. Refer to April 1979, Flint Michigan, TWA flight nonstop from New York to Minneapolis. Quick pilot reaction saved that one, but it was close, very close! Included same “g-force” anomalies, i.e. passengers floating out of their seats, etc. Suggest you look this up on internet. Aircraft manufacturers jealously protect their “turf.” 1999 incident involved Boeing 767, 1979 incident was a 727. At root is the fact that Boeing is feeling Airbus Industrie Inc. nipping at its heels. It is all that 3rd density STS love of money stuff, you know!
Q: (A) Well, about this windburst, was there some dimensional phenomenon or trans-density window as we have suggested on our site? (L) Was it an ordinary windburst? I think I have heard that it is impossible to have a windburst at that altitude.
A: Not “ordinary,” but not trans-density, or dimensional. It was a Jetstream “eddy.”
Q: So, there were no rays, beams, microwaves, trans-density or dimensional windows, weird, anomalous, conspiratorial event going on here?
A: No, no, no, no, no!
Q: It was just a terrible tragedy. The pilots fought as hard as they could to save the plane, but were unable to do so, and the bottom line is a lot of people died?
A: Yes, but as is common in all-out emergencies, the human factor was not “perfect.” Pilots were working at cross purposes, but not intentionally! Look up the data on the 1979 case and point this out to the conspiracy thirsty correspondents!
Q: Next item on the agenda: the loss of the new Mars probe. As of the latest I heard, it had still not “called home.” Is the Mars probe lost?
A: Not lost, just partly dysfunctional.
Q: Why is it dysfunctional? Or partly dysfunctional?
A: Rocky surface, misallignment of antennae, slight damage to communications package. may still be retrievable if technicians can locate proper backup software inlet.
Q: So, that is the advice to try to save the mission?
A: Yes.
Q: Anything else?
A: No.
Q: So, there is no conspiracy there, either?
A: It is just as dangerous and just as useless to “see” conspiracy in everything s it is to “see” conspiracy in nothing. We tire of conspiracy “buffs.” They are nutty, and serve as perfect false sponsors to those who really DO seek to conduct widespread mental/psychic manipulations and control.
Q: Okay, that leads into the next question about the excessive contrail activity. (F) I read the articles about the contrails. There did not seem to be any way of verifying anything that was said. Essentially, you were left with the claims of this or that person, few of whom were trained observers, or who were taking all the factors into consideration. (L) Well, we noticed them a lot in the spring of 1998 when we had all the floods and fires later. They are THERE! (F) Yes, but the claims are that contrails were appearing in clear skies, at which point the sky became overcast as a result of these contrails, when the two may not have been related at all. Then, people were noticing cob webs or “angel hair” type stuff falling on the ground. (L) I agree that a lot of it is unverifiable and I haven’t seen any hard proof myself, either; but they ARE there! LOTS of these jets flying about. An exceedingly LOT of flying! And, not only that, other things have been reported and photographed; strange streaks and lines in the sky, dark and light both – as though some sort of cosmic structure is bleeding through! (F) Yes, but you have to wonder about these people. I mean, the stuff about the radar anomalies was clearly an example of ignorance of both radar and weather. Oh, yes, big spheres appear on the radar, but those have been appearing forever! They are nothing but cumulo-nimbus blow-ups – what is called a meso-cyclone, and is very common. The only reason they are getting excited about it is because there is all this communication, all these satellite and radar link-ups, and now the average person gets to see what weathermen have been seeing all along! More coverage and communication just makes it seem like it is something new. People need knowledge about this! Sure, there is stuff going on out there, but people seem to be seeing boogy men behind absolutely everything that happens! And this is because they have no knowledge about these things. Why are these people going off the deep end about these half-baked ideas without bothering to get expert opinions, or even a number of opinions? Why do they promulgate all this nonsense to everybody else as though THEY are experts, with nothing to balance the observations in the way of competent analysis? Meso-cyclones, eruptions of cumulo-nimbus super cells are, by their very nature, perfectly circular because of the cyclonic up-draft! (L) But, the fact still remains, in my opinion, that there are a LOT, LOT, LOT of planes flying above us in the past few years! Whether they are dumping anything on our heads, or what, there are an extreme number of planes flying in these upper level criss-cross patterns. Now, whether they are just playing war-games, or they are spy planes, they are doing SOMETHING! What is the reason for all of this upper level flying that results in these criss-crossed contrails that everybody is seeing?
A: A lot of it is “training maneuver”oriented.
Q: Why are they training so many pilots? What are they preparing for?
A: Military budgets must be justified, you know. Review “Military-Industrial Complex 101.”
Q: So, this is just training flight, justification of budget, and nothing more than that?
A: Well, we would not say “not anything more to it than that,” but, when you say “M-IC,” you have said a lot!
Q: Are you implying that there is a build-up of the Military-Industrial Complex for a reason?
A: To preserve status quo during “peacetime.” This peace business is not very profitable, you know.
Q: Does that suggest that they are building up to set off a war so they can make more money?
A: Maybe if indeed, and if the populous can be hoodwinked. But, fortunately, the public is less hoodwinkable. Maybe the real enemy is “out there, ” rather than “over there.” Was it not always?
Q: Does any of this increased aircraft activity have anything to do with the increased awareness and activities of aliens in and around our planet?
A: As always. But, this awareness is factionalized and compartmentalized.
UPDATE material and explanatory note: After most of this article was written, a lot of water went over the dam and under the bridge. All of the research that went into The Wave and Adventures With Cassiopaea (now incorporated into The Wave) was done, and all of this was published on this website. It is worthwhile to read it all in order to get a more complete sense of the expansion of the knowledge base through these years.
Of course, during this time, many of the Cassiopaean predictions came to pass and after 9-11 we entered fully into the world that they had been describing for the previous 6 years as being our fate. Needless to say, these events gave a lot more credibility to the source and information. As noted, much was confirmed via research.
After 9-11 came the concentrated research into psychopathology and human cognitive states, and this is ongoing.
Session date 6 August 2005:
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population thinks there was complicity on the part of the US government in 9/11?
A: 47%
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population actually thinks at all?
A: 12% if you define it rigidly. (group amazement at this figure)
What do you expect with HAARP turning brains to tapioca
(J) So it’s a Zombie nation then?
A: You took the words right out of 6th density.
Q: (J) so does HAARP only affect the US population?
A: Mostly.
Session 20 October 2005:
Q: (J) I want to know about these strange formations on the radar image of Hurricane Rita.
A: 4th density “battle.” Also includes some “practice.”
Q: (L) They’re practicing with new weapons. (J) Some people said Katrina was the product of HAARP heating up the waters in the Gulf.
A: We’ve already dealt with HAARP and weather. Read transcripts.
Q: (W) (Quoting transcripts) “HAARP has nothing to do with the weather or EM associated with same.” (H) Which suggests that there is EM associated with the weather. There could be some EM stuff associated with the weather that isn’t part of HAARP. (L) 4th density. (J) Were any of the storms manufactured from 3rd density or was it a natural storm?
A: Mfg in 3D? No. As we have said… 4D battles represent as weather. But the “veil” is thinning.
Q: (R) So if there is more weather it is due to more battles, and it being thinner. (J) Possibly. The thinning of the veil creates more natural… (L) Or unnatural, depending upon how you look at it. (S) So, I have a few questions. In the last session the C’s had said that 47% of Americans think that the government was complicit in 911. They also said that 12% of Americans can actually think. So, assuming that the 12% that can think are part of the 47% who think the American government was complicit in 911, that would give 35% would think the government is complicit not because they think but because they have been programmed to think it. If that is the case, then why are these people being programmed to be suspicious or against the Bush government?
A: They are not being programmed to be suspicious of Bush et al, the contrary.
Q: (L) In other words, it is the ones who think that Bush is not complicit that are being programmed. The ones who don’t think it, even if they’re part of that 35%, they’ve simply never been programmed. (R) Those who are programmed are programmed to not be suspicious. (A) You can be suspicious, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you can think. (L) The ones who are not suspicious are the ones being programmed, but it doesn’t mean… Ops can just be Ops. They don’t have to be bad or evil, they’re just the ones who, nobody’s gotten to them, there’s been no opportunity…maybe they’re just people who don’t want to watch television so much. Or they are contrary in a certain way. They see that there is a group of people who are suspicious and they follow along with them rather than following along with the ones who are not suspicious.
Session 20 June 2009:
A: 5 more years! 2 go! 0 new year! (Transcriber’s note: June 2014?)
Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Poinonia
Q: (L) And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea
Q: (L) Is there any particular reason you made the announcement about 5 years to go?
A: Just reminding you.
Q: (L) You normally have never been date-specific.
A: This is not “day” specific but close enough for horseshoes.
Q: (Joe) A lot of the New Agers are gonna be disappointed in 2012.
A: 2012 is a distraction. We have repeatedly talked about the open nature of the future. It is always open until the probabilities begin to collapse, such as now. But macro-collapses take some “time”.
Q: (L) So you’re saying that there is a macro-collapse that has already begun?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Is that possible? (Ark) Umm, well, yes.
A: Wait and see!
Q: (Ark) In fact I was thinking about this today because yesterday there were three strange events. Namely, today I look at statistics on my blog, and like normally I have like, you know like, 600 or 700, you see? Unique visitors. And then, three days ago there was 1500. Two days ago there was like 1700, and yesterday it was 4000. (Anna) Really? (L) So it was like telling you something? (Ark) Yes, so it was like quantum jump. It started to grow, grow, grow. It was not just one day, you know? It started growing, growing, growing, and then BOOM to 4000 yesterday. (L) Can you explain the exponential growth of Ark’s readership on his blog?
A: Mass consciousness is aware and driving seeking from many quarters.
Q: (L) Well, in that respect, there’s also some other things that are very strange that are going on. For example, I would like to know what is going on with D****? D*** has been writing us many e-mails that are more or less incoherent. We tried at one point to communicate with him and to persuade him that he needed to get counseling, to do something, and I don’t know whether he has or whether he hasn’t. But he seems to be mentally deteriorating. At the same time, I also got an e-mail today from a former member of the forum, and he was also a member of QFS for a very short time, although he never participated – or very little – over a period of a couple of years. But anyhow, he says his name is Muhammad, and he says he lives in Lebanon, but his IP address points to Washington DC. His e-mails are very similar to D****’s: fairly incoherent, and actually threatening. I mean, reading his e-mail, I thought this was strange. If your name is Muhammad in this day and age, you don’t go around vaguely threatening somebody with end of the world scenarios saying that something big is gonna happen. Nevertheless, that’s what he did. And I would like to know is there any relationship between the apparent deterioration of the minds of these two people?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is the relationship?
A: It is not just “waves” beamed by such things as HAARP or microwaves, it is also a quickening of the cosmos. Those who are not integrated will disintegrate at an even faster rate than ever.
Q: (L) Are there any kinds of negative spirits or attachments involved here?
A: Not necessary when the personality is so fragmented.
Q: (L) Alright then. Is there anything that we could do?
A: Perhaps if you could share the technique that you used to achieve emotional cleansing, a lot of people would benefit including the two individuals in question.
This last led to the creation of the Eiriu Eolas stress reduction, healing and rejuvenation program.
Session date 30 January 2010:
Q: (L) I have a question. I’ve been waiting for somebody to ask it, but since nobody is going to ask it, I want to ask it: Was the Haiti earthquake an induced earthquake, or was it totally natural?
A: (Planchette swirls on board) INDUCED! Bet you didn’t expect that, did you?!
Q: (L) Frankly, I didn’t. Because I’ve already gone on record saying it wasn’t. I just poo-pooed the whole idea as too far out there. (laughter) So now I’ve gotta…
(Joe) Well, it was the Russians who said that, wasn’t it?A: No!
Q: (Joe) Didn’t you tell us the Russians reported that? (L) The question I want to ask is, how do they induce earthquakes? (To Ark) How do you think they induce earthquakes?
(Ark) Well, just search the internet! (laughter) Yeah, it’s on the internet. You create special waves that go into the earth and propagate in the right direction… (L) I don’t believe it. They don’t have enough power to do that.
(Joe) I want to know who induced it?A: U.S.
Q: (Joe) At the government level, or super-secret nonsense?
A: Secret gov.
Q: (L) And how did they do this? Was this from some kind of waves that Ark is talking about?
A: Close. And notice that no one is arguing with them right now!
Q: (L) In other words, you’ve got something that can do that, nobody’s gonna mess with you. (Ark) But the main question is, did they really want to induce it in the neighborhood of Haiti, or it was a mistake?
A: Yes, the prep was done.
Q: (Andromeda) So they intentionally did it to Haiti.
(Ark) What I would do, I would use a submarine and go near the fault, and do the job using these submarines as a so to say amplifiers for something. There are these faults under the ocean. It’s enough to move this fault in the right direction with the right frequency, and you get it.A: Too dangerous that way because the pulses would also destroy the sub. Better to use triangulated space-based weapons.
Q: (Belibaste) Why did they target Haiti specifically?
A: Close to South America. Convenient, oil, other factors of imperialistic nature.
Q: (Andromeda) Was it like a test?
A: No.
Q: (Burma Jones) Not a test, so they’ve used this thing a lot before?
(Joe) They used it on the Columbia.A: Once or twice.
Q: (Joe) Used on the space shuttle. (Psyche) That’s why Chavez was so sure.
(Ark) It’s probably much easier for the island than on the mainland… (L) Yeah, because you’ve got separation with the ocean bed and different strata. It would be too uncontrollable if you started zapping a fault on a large land body.
(Andromeda) Like California?
(Joe) When they said, “notice how no one is arguing with them now”, does that mean that most major nations in the world are aware that this was a…A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Good way to shut people up.
A: Spy vs. Spy
Q: (L) Anybody else got anything pressing? (Nomad) I just wanted to know what happened to me, the strange stuff that happened to me two years ago?
(L) Be specific. (Nomad) Well, there was some high strangeness, and there was a big HAARP spike at the same time it happened.
(L) When? (Nomad) With the whole Z*** thing. I just kind of flipped out.A: Can u say “love bite”?
Q: (Joe) You said there was high strangeness? (Nomad) Yeah, there was this HAARP spike.
(L) And you think that had something to do with it? Could have. (Nomad) Just to push me over the edge a little bit more.
(L) And you were susceptible. Could have been. So ask that specifically? Did it have anything to do with that HAARP spike?A: Little.
Q: (L) I think they once said – and I’m pretty sure it was because I copied all that stuff onto the forum the other day – that HAARP was mainly used to control North America because it doesn’t have the range. (Joe) That was the frequency fence, right?
(L) Yeah. But then they’ve got satellites, so… I think you were manipulated. But you didn’t want to hear it. (Nomad) I wasn’t in a state to hear anything.
(L) Just remember when you were in a state to not hear anything, and then the next time you’re in that state, you’ll hear it.
Now, getting back to the original text of the article:
There is another interesting phenomenon going on with those things they call “Roswell Rods,” too, and I think that is also a 4th Density “bleedthrough.” We asked about them a few weeks ago when I was first pointed to the pages about them. It was a short exchange, but worth reproducing here:
07-31-99
Q: Next question. Somebody sent me some information recently about something called “Roswell Rods.” Can you tell me what these “Rods” are?A: Do you mean the life forms?
[I thought this was funny since the above question is absolutely verbatim from the session and I had not mentioned it to the other participants, so no one had any idea that other people were suggesting that they were “life forms.”]
Q: Well, that IS what some of the folks are trying to call them!
A: 4th Density Life Forms.
Q: That’s pretty interesting. (A) Is it a being with a soul?
A: Sort of.
Q: (A) Intelligent?A: Relative to others.
Q: In terms of what we know about relative intelligence, could you give us an example of something in our density that relates here?
A: Birds.
Q: They are like 4th density birds?A: Maybe. That’s close enough.
This seems to suggest that we may expect to see a lot of other strange phenomena, either sooner or later, more or less rapidly, as these changes of density manifest here and there on the planet.
I know that I have been noticing a lot of VERY strange cloud formations, unlike any I have ever seen before in all my years of being a diligent sky watcher! What they remind me of is the cloud formations on Jupiter!
Linda writes: There is also something I have been thinking about …..Is there anything in 7th density ? If I got this right a long time ago there was a disbursement or fragmentation of the ONE and it happened all at once .Did the whole split , did some of the whole stay ,did some go , is there a hierarchy on 7th or is 7th whole? and if 7th is whole is there still a balance of good and bad like in other densities?
Like you, I want things laid out in practical terms! I guess that most folks can tell just by reading the questions I ask from time to time! The problem we all seem to have is that of thinking in linear terms, past and future, and so forth. As I understand it, 7th Density, The One, IS, and all the rest is sort of the “Dream of the All.”
Let me put a few related things here that may help with this HUGELY difficult question. (And this first excerpt absolutely drove me up a wall!)
11-16-94
Q: (L) You said something the other night about the expansion of the star being conducive to creation. Could you give us a little bit on that aspect?
A: Transdimensional atomic remolecularization.
Q: (L) What is remolecularization.
A: Being reassembled. Density collision.
Q: (L) Collision of one density with another. Does this mean that this was a point in space time when pure energy could form around a framework of a thought pattern and thus become solid matter?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Is this transitioning of energy from higher densities into third density or solid matter kind of a traumatic event for universal energy?
A: Subjective.
Q: (L) Is it a form of death?
A: Death and birth are the same.
Q: (L) Was it a requirement to be on a planet with a dying star for this remolecularization to take place?
A: If 3rd density remolecularization.
Q: (L) So, for energy to go into 3rd density physical level… is energy moving down when it comes into 3rd level?
A: No. Upward.
Q: (L) What moves upward?
A: Molecules, atomic matter. Light is first density and unifies all densities.
Q: (L) Does that mean that by us moving from 3rd density into 4th density that we are getting farther away from unification with the source?
A: No. Light and darkness unify all densities.
Q: (L) How many levels of density are there?
A: 7
Q: (L) When you reach the seventh level, how would you describe that if 1st level is light?A: 7th is core of existence.
Q: (L) Well, if seventh density is the core of existence, would that mean that 1st density is the outer edge of existence?
A: Base.
Q: (L) When one has reached 7th density, then what does one do?
A: When one reaches 7th all do. Time does not exist.
Q: (L) When light is transferred to electrical energy, does it actually change density?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is it from 1st to 3rd when it becomes electricity?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Are there any beings on 7th level?
A: Big bang.
Q: (L) Big bang is at 7th level?
A: Close enough.
Q: (L) So, when we all reach 7th level we will all blow up? We will all become one and it will all start all over again?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Well, that’s not a pleasant thought!
A: Why? There is no time, you dwell there eternally. 7th is the light you see at death of the body.
Q: (L) So, when you die and leave the body, do you go to seventh level?
A: See it.
Q: (L) Well, I have a book over on the shelf called “Messages from Michael”… this entity says that souls are being continually flung off from some sort of soul generator somewhere in the universe… what was this source?
A: Entity at 3rd incarnate.
[This is suggesting that this information comes out of somebody’s mind, though I would hesitate to judge the work of another person.]
Q: (L) Was this information valid in absolute terms?
A: No. Souls are already created.
Q: (L) You mean from the first instant of time (excuse the term)?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, it all seems pretty amorphous.
A: Amorphous is perceptive.
01-07-95
Q: (T) Who eats the Lizzies on the 4th level?
A: No one. 4th is the last density for full manifestation of STS.
Q: (T) So, beings on the 5th and 6th level exist in pure energy?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) The 4th level is the last for full STS. Does that mean that the 5th level, which you have described as the “contemmplative” level… what is the state of existence of a STS being on the 5th level?
A: Souls of 1,2,3, and 4 go to 5th.
Q: (T) So 5th level is where they go to while waiting to go back to one of the 4 for their next incarnation?
A: Exactly.
Q: (T) That is why it’s called the contemplation level. You go and think about what you have done. (T) What about souls on 6th density? (L) Are there 6th density STS beings?
A: No, when you get to 6th you no longer need to recycle.
Q: (L) But still, is there an STS experience at 6th density, like the 6th density Orions?
A: These are only reflections of individuals, not unified entities. These reflections exist for balance. They are not whole entities, just thought forms.
Q: (L) Are these 6th density beings what the Bible describes as a “gathering” of angels as in the story of Job where “Lucifer” came in before the Lord…
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, there are STS at 6th density which balance? And they are just there, they exist?
A: Reflection for balance.
Q: (L) Is there any kind of heirarchy to this thing? Do these beings come before some kind of “Grand Council” and make plans and discuss things, and make decisions and implement them?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, how do things happen? Do things just sort of happen as a natural interaction of things and energies?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) If we are on the 3rd density and you are working with us and we are striving to make 4th density, at the same time are you, at 6th density, striving to reach 7th?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Is helping us, helping you to reach 7th density?
A: No, we all reach 7th level together.
Q: (L) So, in other words, you guys are trying to bring us up and everbody else is coming up, and when all the pieces are back together, we then go to 7th, is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So that is your purpose in helping us?
A: It’s a natural process.
Q: (T) Will our function be, when we are at 6th density, to help others on 3rd, as you are doing?
A: Yes. We are you in the future.
Q: (T) When more than 50 per cent of the souls reach 6th density in preparation to go to 7th density, will all the rest of them automatically manifest into that density?
A: Not correct concept. You are using 3rd density “Serpent Brotherhood” inspired mathematical calculations and ideas.
Q: (J) So, there are no percentages involved in it. (T) So, we have to get every single soul up there. (V) I don’t think it is as much that as that you can’t apply 3rd density mathematics to that level. (T) Let’s say a majority.
A: No. Still using 3rd density mathematics.
Q: (L) Okay, what criteria constitutes the means of this ultimate translation into 7th density?
A: The lessons completed.
Q: (J) Okay. (T) When all the souls transition to 7th density, will all the souls be integrated into one soul?
A: Close.
Q: (T) So that is why we have to get everybody, because we all become one on 7th density. (D) What will we then do to change the game and make it interesting again?
A: Don’t have to “do” anything, has, will, is!!!
03-04-95
Q: (L) What is the source of energy generated by stars?
A: Transfer points cause friction thus producing energy.
Q: (L) Transfer points of what; from what to what?
A: Dimensions.
Q: (L) Now, this is going to be a strange question, but if you can help us out, relate this to something it would be very helpful. There are a lot of theories going around about the age of the universe. Some of the latest says that it is anywhere from 8 to 25 billion years old. I know that you have said that time is an illusion, but, in view of the fact that scientists are struggling with this one… [Much laughter hoots and hollering from group] …which of the figures that they have pulled out of the air, in terms of the time illusion itself, is the most correct?
A: None.
Q: (F) Does that answer the question satisfactorily? That’s like saying: “Oh, that’s an interesting store, what’s in there?” (L) Well, if none of the figures science has come up with is correct, what is the correct definition of the age of the universe?
A: Quasi-quantum possibilities.
Q: (L) What does that mean? [Laughter.] (J) Anybody’s guess?!
A: Discover.
Q: (J) Thanks a lot! (L) Come on and help us out here guys? (T) In their time, which is no time, it exists at all times and not time, in our time, that would be infinity. (L) Okay. (T) So, the age of the universe is infinite in our time limit, but they way they perceive it is it doesn’t… it exists until it doesn’t… it does and then it does not… (L) Okay, let’s ask this another way… help me out here… (J) Go for it! (F) You got yourself in the woods, keep looking for the crumbs to find your way out! (L) What do you mean by quasi-quantum possibilities?
A: Closed circle.
Q: (L) Okay, if you select any one point on the circle, and hold that point, and then measure around to the point again, where on that circle are we? Arbitrarily?
A: Not correct concept.
Q: (L) Okay, well help me out here. If there is a closed circle, that means that there is no point that you can arbitrarily designate? (J) Yes.
A: Yes.
Q: (J) It is, it was, it always will be, world without end, amen! (F) Well, if there is no time as we are told, and there is free will that is so important, how can this be? If there is no time and everything is connected, past, present and future, and everything is just a random collection of thoughts and experiences, and everything is supposed to be fluid, then there can’t ever have been free will. If there is free will, and there is no past, present or future, and everything is all the same point in space time experience, the key is the free will, but there is no answer. (L) Well, I can’t grasp it, so let’s switch gears. Is the planet earth, as so many have predicted, going to acquire an additional sun?
A: Maybe.
Q: (T) An additional sun, like if Jupiter blows up? Is Jupiter an unborn sun?
A: Jupiter is already a star.
Q: (L) Why do we not perceive it as a star?
A: You are still learning. Earth is a star to be.
Q: (F) How the hell can that be? (L) If a planet…
A: Every thing cycles fully.
Q: (L) If a star is a transition point from one dimension to another, when the earth moves into 4th density, is it going to appear as a star to the people in 3rd density?
A: “Gas planet.”
Q: (L) It will appear as a gas planet? (J) Just as Jupiter appears to us.
A: Jupiter is level 4 density.
Q: (L) To whom does Jupiter appear as a flaming sun, at what level?
A: 5, 6, and 7.
Q: (T) What does it look like in 4th?
A: Earth.
Q: (T) Jupiter looks like Earth and Earth looks like Jupiter in 4th density?
A: No.
Q: (L) What does Earth look like in 4th density?
A: Invisible.
Q: (J) Huh? (L) What do you mean, invisible?
A: Only visible upon request. Variability of physicality.
Q: (L) Okay, does this mean that to the Lizzies and Orions the earth is invisible?
A: When they are not thinking about it.
Q: (J) You mean when they are not thinking about it it doesn’t exist? They have to focus on it for it to become visible?
A: Close.
Q: (T) But, you told us one time that everyone in 4th density was able to see us?
A: Yes.
Q: (J) Us, not earth. (T) What do they see us on?
A: Able to see you when they choose to.
Q: (J) In other words, they focus on the frequency to see us. (L) I guess it is like animals in second density. You ride down the road and don’t really see what is around you unless you focus in on it. (J) Unless you concentrate on looking for them… (T) Like standing still in a forest and after a time you can see what is there. (J) It is all according to perception.
A: Yes, but 4th level is the first one with true variability.
Q: (L) Georges Gurdjieff proposed the idea that the earth is, in a sense, food for the moon. What he meant was, what he had learned from these ancient teachers was that earth was a food source for some level of being, and that possibly these beings had encampments or bases on the moon, but that earth was eventually to become a star and that then the moon would become an inhabited planet as the earth was, and so on… Is this a fairly…
A: Close.
Q: (L) Is the Moon a second density planet?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And the Moon is used as a base by other beings?
A: On different densities.
Q: (L) Are there 2nd density beings that inhabit the moon in a full time way?
A: No.
Q: (T) Are there 3rd density beings?
A: No.
Q: (T) Are there 4th density beings there?
A: Yes. They don’t inhabit the moon, they just use it.
Q: (T) Are there 5th density beings there?
A: 5th uses all.
Q: (T) Are there 6th density beings there?
A: Ditto.
Q: (T) Is the 7th density being there?
A: That is union with the One.
Q: (L) The “Arcturians” talk about the path to the Great Central Sun. What is the Great Central Sun, and what does this mean, “The path to the Great Central Sun?”
A: 7th level.
Q: (L) Is the star, Arcturus, also a residence, as in planet, for certain beings?
A: Stars are transition and communication points.
Q: (L) The book, “We Are the Arcturians”, talks about the Arcturians, and it says that they live on the star Arcturus, that it is a planet for them, and that they have families, reproduce, and do all kinds of normal things. This struck me as strange.
A: No. This information was told in a format that would be understood best by those who read it.
05-31-95
Q: (L) What could we use to represent 7th density as a mathematical symbol?
A: Try this: [draws figure eight on side in ellipse]
Q: (L) When you get to the point of the Big Bang, or mass disbursement, what mathematical symbol would represent that? Plus, minus, multiply or divide?
A: NAB
Q: (L) Do you mean none of the above?
A: Close.
Q: (L) What mathematical operation would represent this?
A: You have not yet discovered.
Q: (L) What kind of mathematical operation would take place at the point of the Big Bang?
A: One continuous cycling.
Q: (L) The transition of seventh density to the density where the cycling begins is from seventh to sixth or from seventh to first?
A: Neither.
Q: (L) Does it go from seventh to all densities simultaneously?
A: Closer.
Q: (L) Can this be expressed mathematically?
A: Maybe. Access your own channel.
09-16-95
Q: (RC) Who are the Hoovids?
A: Transplanetary.
Q: (RC) Did the Hoovids become the Hebrews?
A: No. Hebrews do not stem from single grouping.
Q: (L) Are or were the Hebrews a separate racial group?
A: Not necessarily.
Q: (L) What was the origin of the Hebrew People?
A: Genetic construct.
Q: (L) Who did this genetic construct?
A: Joint effort of many sources, basically Orion Union Chain of Command.
Q: (L) Are there any actual inhabited planets in the Pleiades?
A: Yes.
Q: (RC) What about the Sirians?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Alright, the Orions created the Hebrews. What was the purpose for which this genetic variation was created?
A: Manipulation.
Q: (L) Who was Yahweh?
A: False teacher.
Q: (RC) Who was Jehovah?
A: Moniker variance of previous answer.
Q: (L) And what was the desired result of the Hebrew genetic manipulation?
A: Further control through the fostering of mistrust and hostility, leading to enslavement and warring. Also accomplished renewed and invigorated 3rd to 4th density “feeding.”
Q: (RC) The Tetragrammaton, which is a code for the name of God in the Old Testament, who or what does this code represent?
A: Be careful not to get caught up in ancient deceptions, but ostensibly it “means” I Am The One.
Q: (RC) The “I Am The One,” according to my research, is another word for “Isis.” Is this related to the “birth goddesses” as described by Sitchin?
A: Whoa, wait a minute, what did we just advise???
Q: (RC) Don’t get caught up in ancient deceptions? Okay, why is it that Hebrew, being so specific in participles in terms of gender qualities, how come, in the Old Testament, there are feminine connotations for the names of God, and also feminine connotations for God being in HER palaces? As well as masculine?
A: Why not? If it works, do it.
Q: (RC) Is the “I Am The One” a feminine force?
A: My Dear, you seem to be stuck upon gender classifications. Now this is understandable, but prepare yourself for a different explanation here. On density levels 5 through 7 there is no duality. The “God Force” emanates “down” from 7th density and permeates all densities. It recognizes no classifications related to duality, since it is perfectly blended, thus in permanent balance.
Q: (RC) But the gender names are in the original texts?
A: This is true, but the original texts were also deceptive in nature.
01-13-96
Q: Next question: How does one determine if they are channeling a 3rd density dead dude, or a higher density being?
A: Corrections and clarifications needed: “Dead Dudes” are 5th density beings. Either they are stuck in 3rd density, or they are communcating from 5th density, not 3rd density!! They are not 3rd density! 1st density includes all physical matter below the level of consciousness. 6th density is uniform in the level pattern of lightness, as there is complete balance on this density level, and the lightness is represented as knowledge. 7th density is union with the one… it is timeless in every sense of the word, as its “essence” radiates through all that exists in all possible awareness realms. The light one sees at the termination of each conscious physical manifestation is the union, itself. Remember, 4th density is the first that includes variable physicality!! Ponder this carefully!!! And, remember, there is only one “God,” and that the creator includes all that is created and vice versa!
06-15-96
A: Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics to make the picture crystal clear.
Q: (L) Gravity seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct?
A: And…. antimatter!
Q: (L) Is the gravity that is a property of antimatter “antigravity?” Or, is it just gravity on the other side, so to speak?
A: Binder.
Q: (L) Okay. Gravity is the binder. Is gravity the binder of matter?
A: And… Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity waves!!!
Q: (L) Is antimatter ethereal existence?
A: Pathway to. Doorway to.
Q: (L) Are unstable gravity waves… no, hold everything… do unstable gravity waves emanate from 7th density?
A: Throughout.
Q: (L) Do they emanate from any particular density?
A: That is just the point, there is none.
Q: (L) There is no emanation point?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of matter, and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation?
A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti-matter, too!
Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other densities?
A: Everything.
Q: (L) Can you generate them mechanically?
A: Generation is really collecting and dispersing.
Q: (L) Okay, what kind of a device would collect and disperse gravity waves? Is this what spirals do?
A: On the way to.
Q: (L) So, if were to focus on collecting unstable gravity waves…
A: When you wrote “Noah” where did you place gravity?
Q: (L) I thought that gravity was an indicator of the consumption of electricity; that gravity was a byproduct of a continuous flow of electrical energy…
A: Gravity is no byproduct! It is the central ingredient of all existence!
Q: (L) I was evaluating by electric flow and consumption… and I was thinking that electricity was evidence of some sort of consciousness, and that gravity was evidence that a planet that had it, had life…
A: We have told you before that planets and stars are windows. And where does it go?
Q: (L) The windows?
A: The gravity.
Q: (L) Oh. Gravity must go into the ethereal dimensions or densities. I mean, you have my head going in so many different directions that I feel like I have popcorn in there.
A: Good!
Q: (L) Well, where does gravity go. The sun is a window. Even our planet must be a window!
A: You have it too!!
Q: (L) So, gravity is the unifying principle… the thing that keeps things together…
A: Gravity is all there is.
Q: (L) What is light?
A: Gravity.
Q: (L) Is gravity the same as the strong and weak nuclear forces?
A: Gravity is “God.”
Q: (L) But, I thought God was light?
A: If gravity is everything, what isn’t it? Light is energy expression generated by gravity.
Q: (L) Is gravity the “light that cannot be seen,” as the Sufis call it: the Source.
A: Please name something that is not gravity.
Q: (L) Well, if gravity is everything, there is nothing that is not gravity. Fine. What is absolute nothingness?
A: A mere thought.
Q: (L) So, there is no such thing as non-existence?
A: Yes, there is.
Q: (L) Do thoughts produce gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Does sound produce gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Can sound manipulate gravity?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Can it be done with the human voice?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Can it be done tonally or by power through thought?
A: Both. Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity.
Q: (L) Well, I thought the Sufis were tough! (F) Well, it’s probably because of your studies that this door opened. (L) Good grief! What have I done! Alright. I am confused.
A: No you are not.
Q: (L) Then, just put it this way: I am befuddled and overloaded.
A: Befuddling is fun! How many times do we have to tell you?!?!
Q: (L) Learning is fun! Right!
A: The entire sum total of all existence exists within each of you, and vice versa.
Q: (L) Then what is the explanation for the “manyness” that we perceive?
A: Perception of 3rd density.
Q: (L) So, the entire universe is inside me… okay, that’s… I understand. Oddly enough, I do. The problem is accessing it, stripping away the veils.
A: That is the fun part.
I apologize for this being so long a series of extracts. Actually, there is more on the subject, but I don’t want the page to get too long.
I hope that all of it helps to put the puzzle together.
Linda writes: PS; I would like to thank you for the opportunity you have given us to be able to read about your communications with the Cassiopeans .
We want to thank you and all others who help us to find places for material that is sort of difficult to find a place for by asking questions! And there is so much of it that is waiting for the right questions!
Laura
Discover more from Cassiopaea
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.