FOTCM Logo
Cassiopaea
  • EN
  • FR
  • DE
  • RU
  • TR
  • ES
  • ES

Making Sense of Political Complexity

Looking out over the sorry state of our world, it isn’t easy to make sense of what is going on. There are so many factors at play, so many levels of play and deception and manipulation with very few of the players having a complete overview of the ultimate plan. This complexity allows everyone to become a pawn: you’ll hear one say that the Iraq war was about oil, another will say it was to advance Israel, another that it was to move in on the French and Russians. Each of these explanations have a kernel of truth to it because there were groups involved who did have these interests, and many more. But the entire situation cannot be understood as the expression of a single issue unless and until the real underlying cause is identified, the one that serves as context for the others, that is capable of subsuming them all within it.

Looking out over the sorry state of our world, it isn’t easy to make sense of what is going on. There are so many factors at play, so many levels of play and deception and manipulation with very few of the players having a complete overview of the ultimate plan. This complexity allows everyone to become a pawn: you’ll hear one say that the Iraq war was about oil, another will say it was to advance Israel, another that it was to move in on the French and Russians. Each of these explanations have a kernel of truth to it because there were groups involved who did have these interests, and many more. But the entire situation cannot be understood as the expression of a single issue unless and until the real underlying cause is identified, the one that serves as context for the others, that is capable of subsuming them all within it.

It is important to keep in mind that the political drama that is played out for the masses is just that: a drama. For example, France may appear to oppose the war in Iraq, but that is because the French people have to be taken into account. Most French people do NOT like politicians in general and feel that it is their duty to oppose anything proposed by them. Moreover, there is a HUGE Muslim population in France. So, had Chirac been in favor of the war, there would have been a far worse situation in France than there was in the case of the recent employment law, the EU Constitution, the headscarf ban, etc.

The force of France at the moment, a force that appears to be long spent in the United States, is the readiness of even the most ordinary French citizen to become active in politics and fight for what he or she believes. The media in France and elsewhere, especially in the Anglo-Saxon countries, tries to portray the French as fighting to hold on to their cushy jobs in the face of the inevitable “restructuring” that must take place for the new economy to emerge. You know the “new economy”, it is the one that will make everything great once all the safegaurds already in place have been removed.

But if you already had job security and a way of life that had been won at the cost of hard struggle, why would you give it up for illusory promises from people you don’t trust, who have proved themselves capable of lying with a straight face over and over again?

An element that is rarely considered when trying to understand international politics is blackmail. Certainly we hear stories often enough from around the world of people being set up in honey traps with the cameras going. We read in spy novels that it is a favourite way of turning someone. But have you really considered what this means for the real workings of the world?

Regarding blackmail, there is ONE group that runs about everything on this planet (though less so in China, but I understand they are making inroads even there.) This group is primarily Zionist, though not exclusively. And when I say “Zionist,” I don’t necessarily mean Jewish either. Some of the most rabid Zionists are Christian Fundies trying to “Initiate the Eschaton” by supporting Israel, with the firm belief that Israel and all the Jews will be destroyed in the end if they don’t get “saved.” Let’s just call them Pathocrats. There are high level pathocrats in about every country. At the top, the “national divisions” seem to fall away and each “top person” looks at his constituency, his “masses of plebes” as his “ante into the pot” for the overall game.

Notice also that here, I am not necessarily talking about elected or publicly known individuals, but rather those who really run things. I don’t like to call them Illuminati or even to refer to the alleged “masters,” the Rothchilds because I am not entirely certain that these are not just red herrings to distract attention.

So, imagine a group of these men, the ones with the power to make or break heads of state, conspiring as to how they are going to implement a massive population reduction program to eliminate about 90 percent of the planet’s population, to preserve their own elite groups, and to have perhaps enough common people left to serve their needs and interests. These people know that the planet is beginning a process of global climate change that will lead to massive food shortages, water shortages, disease, and possibly even cataclysm. They know that if they do not do something to deal with masses of people, to eliminate many of them, and to control the rest, that they, themselves, are in danger of losing control, even their lives.

Now, how do you suppose they would go about setting up the game to accomplish this?

Well, they would do something like create a lot of apparent global conflict and disagreement so as to provoke many different groups and nationalities into stances that are oppositional to one another. The more provocation to chaos they can provoke, the more reasons they have for imposing draconian laws because the people will be frightened of the chaos and will want that protection. At the same time, the fires of nationalism will be lit and the various groups will be ready, willing and able to go out and kill each other off, which results in accomplishing precisely what the pathocrats want. Those troublesome people with fire in their bellies just eliminate each other, the passive cowardly types are well and truly fenced in and accepting total control, their own position is secured and even enhanced, and everybody’s happy.

It’s simple Machiavelli, ideas as old as Time that have been in use, consciously, for millennia.

Let’s look at the question of 9/11. The great weak point of 9/11 is the Pentagon attack. If one were able to offer concrete proof that Flight 77 didn’t hit the Pentagon, the government story collapses.

Well, it so happens that, from what we have learned, it is very possible, even probable, that one or more countries have satellite photos of what happened that day at the Pentagon. So why haven’t they shown them?

For the same reason that everything else is controlled: Blackmail and power games.

Even IF there are multiple reasons to do something, there may be more reasons, with more weight, NOT to do the thing. That is why politicians have many advising committees and strategy game simulators.

In politics nothing is simple. Politics is full of contradictions and many game players are participating. For instance it may appear that the US and Russia are enemies. But they may have common plans. The same with France.

So if several countries, such as France, Russia and China have photos that out the Bush gang and Israel on 9/11, they aren’t necessarily going to play those cards. But trying to observe their behavior and figure out the reasons can be a challenge.

Let’s say that if, right after 911, they had shown the world the truth, well, the whole thing would have been so simple, right? The U.S. population would have turned against Bush and his Pathocrats and the peoples of France, Russia and China would have backed their governments up in coming over and overseeing the straightening out of the U.S. corrupt govermental systems.

But then, the pathocrats at the top would have all lost the golden opportunity to have a war or two or three and decimate large numbers of people! And believe me, at the TOP, that IS the agenda!

As for the leaking of the IDEA via Thierry Meyssan, my thought is that he was just another useful idiot, primed by the fire in the belly for righteousness. In a certain sense, we are all useful idiots because we all just contribute to the general melee of ideas while the Masters of Deception pick and choose which idea they want to push or suppress from one day to the next.

Will the truth ever be revealed, will the alleged photos ever be published or otherwise circulated?

Possibly. But look at what happened to such things as the Downing Street Memos. Was that a leak by someone with a conscience, or was it a deliberate leak to just create more controversy between those who can see and those who just cling desperately to naive beliefs? Observe how it was spun and/or ignored, or how it came and went and Bush is still spying on congress and journalists, the neocons are goosestepping along their merry way without a care in the world about what the masses of Americans think.

I think that if they are revealed, it will be when the moment is precisely right for the revelation to lead to the greatest number of deaths and the greatest chaos.

Moreover, to let other countries to TAKE these photos may have been part of the plan. After all, G. W. Bush is likely a marionette and, perhaps, at some point, there will be a necessity to get rid of him. The gamesmanship is on many levels, and the complexity of planning must not be underestimated. On the other hand there are always surprises, and new elements come into the game that were not taken into account by the gamers.

It should be also remebered that there are other ways of taking photos of interesting objects at interesting times than via satellites. See for instance project Aurora and its highly classified “improvements” that different countries are working on since many years.

Some other thoughts I have had while observing the global gamesmanship is that it has been a very clever maneuver for France, Russia, China, and even Israel, to more or less step back and allow the U.S. to engage itself and its resources on different fronts. The U.S. is now weaker than it has ever been, stretched beyond endurance both economically and personnel wise. Most professional jobs and manufacturing jobs are outsourced overseas, the education system is worse than you can even imagine, (especially if you are not familiar with European schooling), and its goal seems to be to produce cannon fodder, health is declining at a massive rate, and the other countries are just sitting around like vultures waiting for the weakness to become sufficient that they can begin the picking and pecking. Why would France or Russia or China or even Israel want to HELP the U.S. population? After all, the U.S. is full of 300 million people that are competitors for resources. Better to sit back, refuse to engage your own people (yet) and let the U.S. wear itself out, stretch itself thin, and go down the tubes on its own. And, after all the years of the arrogant U.S. lording it over everyone else, don’t think that, at some level, there isn’t some fiendish satisfaction at watching the process!

There are so many levels, so many games being played, so much drama created for the average person, all designed to appeal to different types, different mentalities, different goals, that there is truly something for everyone here in this smorgasbord of death and destruction that has been laid on the table for the population of the planet.

I doubt that anything either of us think, do, or say will make one whit of difference. I do what I do only because it is the right thing to do and for no other reason. It would be a shame for our civilization to come to an end and nobody stood up for the truth.

Addendum: Having written the above, I came across the following article today:

Gore in Hay climate change plea

In his first UK speech on the subject, Mr Gore promised to devote himself to the task of warning people about the impending “planetary emergency”.

He appealed to the audience to act to halt the growing crisis.

“I will own up to shortcomings in my ability to communicate,” said Mr Gore, who ran against President Bush in 2000.

“But I’m not through with this yet and I am devoting myself to it”.

Mr Gore was the key note speaker of the 19th Hay Festival on the mid-Wales border.

Five years ago Bill Clinton spoke at Hay on his many roles in conflict resolution.

But Mr Gore, fresh from an appearance at the Cannes film festival, delivered a starker message that the world was now facing a “danger which could bring the end of civilisation.” …

Problem is, Gore is as likely part of the “gang” as anyone.

For a very good perspective on what is really behind the global war games including the cointelpro action in the 911 Truth Movement, have a look at Joe Quinn’s article:

Ruppert and Hopsicker Co-Opting the 9-11 Truth Movement Or Exposing the Big Con – Lies and Disinformation At The End Of Civilisation As We Know It

Originally Published 2006_05_30

Related Articles: