The Russian philosopher/mathematician, P.D. Ouspensky recorded G.I. Gurdjieff as saying:
“Man is a machine. All his deeds, action, words, thoughts, feelings, convictions, opinions, and habits are the results of external influences, external impressions. Out of himself a man can’t produce a single thought, a single action. Everything he says, does, thinks, feels – all this happens. Man cannot discover anything, invent anything. It all happens.
“To establish this fact for oneself, to understand it, to be convinced of its truth, means getting rid of a thousand illusions about man, about his being creative and consciously organizing his own life and so on. There is nothing of this kind. Everything happens – popular movements, wars, revolutions, changes of government, all this happens. And it happens in exactly the same way as everything happens in the life of individual man. Man is born, lives, dies, builds houses, writes books, not as he wants to, but as it happens. Everything happens. Man does not love, hate, desire – all this happens.
“But no one will ever believe you if you tell him he can do nothing. This is the most offensive and the most unpleasant thing you can tell people. It is particularly unpleasant and offensive because it is the truth, and nobody wants to know the truth.
“…It is one thing to understand with the mind and another thing to feel it with one’s whole mass, to be really convinced that it is so and never forget it.” [Ouspensky, 1949]
In the same vein, don Juan tells Carlos Castaneda:
“‘There are scores of outside forces controlling you at this moment,’ don Juan replied. ‘The control that I am referring to is something outside the domain of language. It is your control and at the same time it is not. It cannot be classified, but it can certainly be experienced. And above all, it can certainly be manipulated. Remember this: It can be manipulated, to your total advantage, of course, which again, is not your advantage, but the energy body’s advantage. However, the energy body is you, so we could go on forever like dogs biting their own tails, trying to describe this. Language is inadequate. All these experiences are beyond syntax.’ “We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don’t do so. …I have been beating around the bush all this time, insinuating to you that something is holding us prisoner. Indeed we are held prisoner! This was an energetic fact for the sorcerers of ancient Mexico. …They took us over because we are food for them, and they squeeze us mercilessly because we are their sustenance. Just as we rear chickens in chicken coops, the predators rear us in human coops, humaneros. Therefore, their food is always available to them.
“No, no, no, no,” [Carlos replies] “This is absurd don Juan. What you’re saying is something monstrous. It simply can’t be true, for sorcerers or for average men, or for anyone. “Why not?” don Juan asked calmly. “Why not? Because it infuriates you? …You haven’t heard all the claims yet. I want to appeal to your analytical mind. Think for a moment, and tell me how you would explain the contradictions between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior. Sorcerers believe that the predators have given us our systems of belief, our ideas of good and evil, our social mores. They are the ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success of failure. They have give us covetousness, greed, and cowardice. It is the predators who make us complacent, routinary, and egomaniacal.
“‘But how can they do this, don Juan?’ I asked, somehow angered further by what he was saying. ‘Do they whisper all that in our ears while we are asleep?’
“‘No, they don’t do it that way. That’s idiotic!’ don Juan said, smiling. ‘They are infinitely more efficient and organized than that. In order to keep us obedient and meek and weak, the predators engaged themselves in a stupendous maneuver – stupendous, of course, from the point of view of a fighting strategist. A horrendous maneuver from the point of view of those who suffer it. They gave us their mind! Do you hear me? The predators give us their mind, which becomes our mind. The predators’ mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now.
Don Juan continues: “‘I know that even though you have never suffered hunger… you have food anxiety, which is none other than the anxiety of the predator who fears that any moment now its maneuver is going to be uncovered and food is going to be denied. Through the mind, which, after all, is their mind, the predators inject into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them. And they ensure, in this manner, a degree of security to act as a buffer against their fear.
“The sorcerers of ancient Mexico were quite ill at ease with the idea of when [the predator] made its appearance on earth. They reasoned that man must have been a complete being at one point, with stupendous insights, feats of awareness that are mythological legends nowadays. And then, everything seems to disappear, and we have now a sedated man. “What I’m saying is that what we have against us is not a simple predator. It is very smart, and organized. It follows a methodical system to render us useless. Man, the magical being that he is destined to be, is no longer magical. He’s an average piece of meat. There are no more dreams for man but the dreams of an animal who is being raised to become a piece of meat: trite, conventional, imbecilic.”[Castaneda, 1998]
Q: (L) So the [government imitated this animal mutilation activity] to throw off investigations. Did they do this as an act to protect the alleged aliens who were doing animal mutilations for their own purposes?
Q: (L) Were they doing it to protect themselves from the public knowing that they were engaged in supposed alien interactions?
A: They do it to protect the public from knowing that which would explode society if discovered.
Q: (L) What is this item that they were protecting so that society or the public wouldn’t know about it. What activity is this?
A: Humans eat cattle, aliens eat you. […]
Q: (L) Many people hint about some sort of “ultimate secret” that drives men mad when they discover it. What is… the “ultimate secret” being protected by the Consortium?
A: You are not in control of yourselves, you are an experiment.
Q: (T) When you say this is the ultimate secret, that we’re being “protected” from by the government, are we talking about the ultimate secret of humans only here?
Q: (T) The ultimate secret of the human race is that we are an experiment that other humans are conducting on the rest of us?
Q: (T) Okay, does the other part have to do with the Lizards?
Q: (L) Other aliens also?
Q: (T) Okay, so, are the humans who are running the experiment on the 3rd density level know that they, too, are part of the experiment?
Q: (T) And they’re doing this willingly?
A: They have no choice.
Q: (L) Why do they have no choice?
A: Already in progress.
Q: (T) Okay, is this part of, is this about the Lizzies dominating us and sucking us dry?
A: Yes, but there’s much more than that, you will understand at level 4.
Q: (L) How “long”, and I put long in quotes, because we know, as you say, there is no time, but how long, as we measure it, have the Aliens
A: Time travelers, therefore, “Time is ongoing.” Do you understand the gravity of this response?
Q: (L) They are time travelers, they can move forward and backward in time, they can play games with our heads… (T) They can set up the past to create a future they want. (D) They can organize things so that they can create the energy that they need… (L) They can also make things look good, make them feel good, make them seem good, they can make you have an idea one minute, and then the next minute, create some sort of situation that confirms that idea…
A: When you asked how long, of course it is totally unlimited, is it not?
Q: (L) That’s not good. If they were to move back through space time and alter an event in our past, would that alteration in the past instantaneously alter our present as well?
A: Has over and over and over.
Q: (D) So they do it over and over and over, constantly?
A: You just are not yet aware, and have no idea of the ramifications!!!
Q: (L) We’re getting a little glimmer! Yeah, I do, a little! (T) The ramifications of being able to move in and out of time and manipulate it the way you want (Jan/Laura) And the ramifications of what they’re doing to us; what they are doing to us and what they will do to us, over and over. (L) So, in other words, our only real prayer in this whole damn situation is to get out of this density level.
Q: (L) Because, otherwise, we’re just literally, as in that book, stuck in the replay over and over and over, and the Holocaust could happen over and over, and we could just, you know… Ghengis Khan, Atilla the Hun… over and over and over again. (T) We’re stuck in a time loop; they’re putting us in a time loop.
Q: (L) In other words, we’re in bad shape! And these guys are playing games with us, so to speak…
Q: (T) Subjective to whether we’re in bad shape or not.
Q: (T) I was going to say that doesn’t necessarily mean we’re in bad shape… (L) Well, the situation we find ourselves in, is the only way of getting out of this time loop, so to speak, to move into another density, or is there a loop in the other density as well?
A: Yogis can do it. How they control their own physicality.
In the same vein, Don Juan tells Carlos:
“The only alternative left for mankind is discipline. Discipline is the only deterrent. But by discipline I don’t mean harsh routines. I don’t mean waking up every morning at five-thirty and throwing cold water on yourself until you’re blue. Sorcerers understand discipline as the capacity to face with serenity odds that are not included in our expectations. For them, discipline is an art: the art of facing infinity without flinching, not because they are strong and tough but because they are filled with awe. Sorcerers say that discipline makes the glowing coat of awareness unpalatable to the predator. The result is that the predators become bewildered. An inedible glowing coat of awareness is not part of their cognition. If the predators don’t eat our glowing coat of awareness for a while, it’ll keep on growing. Simplifying this matter to the extreme, I can say that sorcerers, by means of their discipline, push the predators away long enough to allow their glowing coat of awareness to grow beyond the level of the toes. Once it goes beyond the level of the toes, it grows back to its natural size. The sorcerers of ancient Mexico used to say that the glowing coat of awareness is like a tree. If it is not pruned, it grows to its natural size and volume. As awareness reaches levels higher than the toes, tremendous maneuvers of perception become a matter of course.” [Castaneda, 1998]
“What are we really doing when we say we are DOing, in the Gurdjieff/don Juan sense of doing? What really happens?
“I would see it this way: there are these simultaneous, infinite numbers of universes. They are, I would say, virtual universes. They exist in a “soft” sense. Then, when we DO something, we follow a certain path, we “solidify” this virtual future. It was soft, and if we do something, it becomes, so to speak, solidified. When it begins to rain, at some point the clouds are being formed from a little condensation, it grows by itself into clouds. So, the point is, if we choose something, maybe there is a kind of condensation around what we choose. When we do something, other people start doing something, and this may condense into something bigger. Something that condenses in us may cause thunder, and then something may change on a big scale.
“Time seems to be subjective. Subjective means: related to our perception but Cassiopaeans say that it is related to DNA and DNA is objective. But, it is our DNA. Kozyrev says that time is material: the flow of time is something that is real and that we can influence this flow of time. We have to reconcile these two viewpoints: that time is subjective, or that time is objectively real.” [Arkadiusz Jadczyk, ad hoc speculations on time, 1999]
Q: (L) At one point we were told that time was an illusion that came into being at the “time” of the “Fall” in Eden, and this was said in such a way that I inferred that there were other illusions put into place at that time…
A: Time is an illusion that works for you because of your altered DNA state.
Q: (L) Regarding the “Fall” in Eden and the loss of the Edenic state, how long ago did that happen?
A: 309000 years ago approx.
Q: (L) What was the situation… what happened… what was the state of mankind?
A: Loss of faith caused knowledge and physical restrictions by outside forces.
Q: (L) What is it that causes us to only be able to perceive time in a sequential way?
A: DNA restructuring, as in the handiwork of our friends, STS 4th density.
Q: (L) Is there any possibility of regaining or restructuring this DNA?
A: Was there, will be again.
Q: (L) We know that you have said that time is an illusion in 3rd density reality – that it is the 3rd density illusion – and it is involved with our DNA, which determines how we perceive it. So, it is an illusion. Yet, somehow, this illusion converts at some point into a solid reality via some mode or operation. I would like to know, at what point it converts and how?
A: You are off base. Who said it converts?
Q: (L) Well, we perceive a damn solid reality! There is STUFF that if you kick it, it hurts!
A: That perception is part of the illusion.
Q: (L) But, that is obviously not the TOTAL illusion. What else is a part of this illusion? If our perception is part, then there must also be something there to be perceived, correct?
Q: (L) Okay, what is it that we are perceiving?
A: That which you are programmed to perceive.
Q: (L) Is not this perception, these things we perceive as outside ourselves, are they not substance of some sort? Are they not there in some form, even if we perceive them the way we do?
A: Of course, but what does this have to do with “time?”
Q: (L) I am getting to that! We perceive a world “out there.” Trees, cars, trucks, houses, bricks, boards, blocks, people, dogs etc etc etc.
A: You left out backyard barbecues!
Q: [laughter] (L) Very funny! We perceive things out there. Of what are they composed?
Q: (L) Of what is matter composed?
A: Atomic structure.
Q: (L) Of what are atoms composed?
Q: (L) Whose thoughts?
Q: (L) Everything?
Q: (L) If I perceive something, and everything I perceive is composed of my thoughts, and V_ is perceiving, is everything her thoughts?
Q: (L) What is the difference between her thoughts and my thoughts?
A: Thoughts are what binds you. You see, it is merely a program that you perceive a difference.
Q: (L) Where does the program come from?
A: Where do your programs come from? We are asking about the programs in your computer.
Q: (L) In my computer? Different places. I get them and load them in. Are programs made – do they exist like ‘thought centers’ – and do we just load them in ourselves?
A: Why have you forgotten? 309,000…
Q: (L) Oh. You are talking about the “takeover” by 4th density STS. But, still, the point I am trying to get to is – yes we have DNA – but you can’t reprogram DNA if there is not DNA there to begin with. If there is not something to load the program into. What is the substance of this reality that we exist in?
A: You just answered. You can’t load it into something if there isn’t something there to begin with. Your previous DNA structure.
Q: (L) Where did the previous DNA structure come from?
A: The previous program.
Q: (L) Okay, the STO program of human beings in the Edenic state before the takeover by the Lizzies. What I want to know is: what is this process whereby thought becomes manifest as matter?
Q: (L) What do you mean by “bilaterally?”
A: Dual emergence.
Q: (L) Emergence into what and what?
A: Not “into what and what,” but rather, “from what and to what.” The beginning emerges from the end, and vice versa.
Q: (L) And what is the beginning and what is the end?
A: Union with the One. 7th density, i.e.: all that is, and is not.
Q: (L) I think you know where I am trying to go with this and I wish you would help me out just a little…
A: We are.
Q: . (A) What is the function of DNA, other than coding protein production?
A: Conductor of electricity.
Q: (L) Is that the only other function?
A: Well, as you know, electrical energy can have nearly endless applications. Examples… radio waves, neurotransceiver for thought pattern programs facilitated through electromagnetic wave transmission, etc. Method used for creation and maintenance of program illusions, such as the perception of linear time as reality.
Q: (A) Which part of a human extends into 4th density?
A: That which is effected by pituitary gland.
Q: (L) And what is that?
Q: (A) Are there some particular DNA sequences that facilitate transmission between densities?
A: Addition of strands.
Q: (L) How do you get added strands?
A: You don’t get, you receive.
Q: (L) Where are they received from?
A: Interaction with upcoming wave, if vibration is aligned.
Q: (L) How do you know if this is happening?
A: Psychophysiological changes manifest.
Q: (A) Is DNA acting as a superconductor?
A: Yes!!! Variably.
Q: (A) When you speak of an upcoming wave, it is a wave of what?
A: Think of it as a wave of reflection from the beginning and end point.
Q: (A) But what vibrates? Energy? Aether?
A: Energy and aether are directly symbiotic.
Q: (A) And when it vibrates, then in which dimension?
A: The density 3 and 4 at transition junction.
Q: (A) If not in linear time, then in what?
A: Cyclical “time.”
Q: (A) What measures the distance between one crest and another?
A: Ending/beginning of cycle.
Q: (L) Okay. Time is an illusion. Wonderful! Let’s work with this allusion. Let us say that the ground is 7th density. How would we picture time in relation to this ground?
A: As the soil.
Q: (L) How do created beings get painted into this picture?
A: Time is your illusion.
Q: (L) Yet, on one other occasion, you said that time does exist at other densities, only that it is “selective,” you can pick the time. Is that correct?
A: If you want to call it time, but it would not be the same, would it?
Q: (A) Is time multidimensional? If so, is it three-dimensional?
A: Not correct concept. Time is not a dimension. This is very complex from your standpoint, but let us just say that time is “selective,” or “variable.”
Q: (L) You said that time was ‘selective and variable.’ What, exactly, does this mean?
A: By “Selective”, we mean simply to think of time as if it were like your jukebox. There are many selections there, you may play them as you choose. But you need not play them sequentially, unless that is all you know. The selections are always there, are they not?
Q: (L) Well, that is crazy! You can’t just go around having things happening in random order?!
A: Random is in the eyes of the perceiver. All is eternal, time is selective. We can see the entire jukebox menu selection at all “times.”
Q: (L) Alright, then. I think that from a previous session we were told that the number of universes was not countable. Is that correct?
A: Infinite, maybe, but more to the point: variable and selective.
Q: (T)Explain variable and selective, please?
A: For those who know how, universes can be created at will in order to transmodify reality merge.
Q: (L) What is a reality merge?
A: What does it sound like?
Q: (T) Merging of realities from one universe into another? A creating of a new reality which is then merged with the old to create a new universe.
Q: (L) Next question: if there were a sufficient number of people who were working on learning how to create an alternate reality or universe, would it seem to them that there was no real “shift” between the former one and the new one, except an internal shift of thought?
A: That is one possibility.
Q: (L) If we decided that we wanted a different world, could we, as even a small group, create that kind of world and have it seem that we hadn’t…
A: We have told you thus.
How accurate is any of what Gurdjieff, Castaneda and the Cassiopaeans have said in relation to what we know about Time?
Ark: “What do we know? We know that we have linear time. If we are in a 4 dimensional Minkowski space as we know from Einstein, in this space there is, indeed, one time that can be perceived differently by different observers. There are factors which can change the flow of time. One of these factors is speed. If you approach the speed of light, time is experienced slower and slower. If you travel at the speed of light, time stops. This was the starting point of all Einstein’s thinking. This is one factor, speed.
“Another factor is, as we know, gravity. If you can engineer a very strong gravitational field, time also slows down, so to speak.
“That is one point of view if we think in terms of 4 dimensional space and time.
“But this type of analysis is based upon the belief that the space time structure is not too dramatically influenced by anything. If space time so to speak, undergoes “earthquakes,” if there are dramatic changes in space time, we may have other strange effects because we may have timeless zones – we can have regions where time would not flow at all, and this is what Sakharov was speculating about. But, we don’t really know what could be the cause of such changes in space time structure.
“And then, we can go beyond that to Kaluza-Klein theories in which we are adding other physical dimensions, and these other dimensions may be of space character, but they may also be of time character. And this was something that Ouspensky was contemplating. He believed that time is really three-dimensional; that there is our ordinary time, and that there is another time he called “eternity,” and still another time…. So, if we look at it this way, we would have three space and three time dimensions, totaling 6, which fits into a geometric structure of a hexagon.
“What is the character of these extra dimensions. Cassiopaean’s answered that the extra dimension is “time-like.” Now, the point is, if this is so, then for soul or consciousness or being that lives and experiences all these dimensions, time is not linear; it is not a line; it is like a plane. On a line, you have an order. On a plane, there is no order. There is no way to determine what succeeds what. There is no linear order on a plane. So, from this point of view, our consciousness somehow collapses from the plane to the line and chooses something in a selective way from the plane and becomes only one dimensional, a line of some kind or another, and then there is an order, and still this line can be a loop or can be different lines that intersect.
“Moreover, if we have this multi-dimensional universe, it need not have a rigid structure like three dimensions for space and three for time. There may be regions where these dimensions divide in a different way. There may be regions where it is even hard to distinguish between what is space and what is time. And this structure, perhaps, is influenced by consciousness. And, that may be related to the concept of densities. So, different densities could mean different ways of structuring multi-dimensional space into space and time and whatever. Thus, the Ouspensky structuring – 3 + 3 – would correspond to our third density.
“Now, what else do we know from physics? Time, like space, is directly related to gravity. Gravity is a geometry of space and time. There is no time without gravity.
“One thing more about time: Time loops. First, physicists were very unhappy about time loops; they didn’t want them. They made a rule that there should be no time loops. If you had time loops in your theory, your theory was “sick.” But then, there was Godel who produced a solution of Einstein Field Equations which involved time loops, and so to say, the source of this looping was a rotating motion. So, if something rotates in a certain way, the thing being the universe itself, then time loops become possible. We can replace the term rotate with spin. The spinning motion can produce strange time effects.
“What happens when we have time loops? Well, if all the universe goes along just one time loop, this is one thing. But if different molecules of our body would choose to go through different time loops, things become chaotic. And physics does not know how to deal with it. So, what if these pictures of different molecules following different time loops have a Mandelbrot type structure? Time loops then means going through a repeating cycle. This may be related to a concept of rejuvenation. If you can cycle your molecules through time loops in a coherent way, maybe your body will not age.
“Back to Gurdjieff: according to his view, with which I tend to agree, and just using this as an analogy, in the beginning, or at 7th density, “God” created the universe which was closed; that is, a perfect universe. But, somehow, this perfect universe proved to be a dying universe. And then, the only way to produce something that would not die, was to produce a universe that is open: a universe in which the future is open and can be shaped; in which even the creator, Himself, could not, so to say, see what would be the final result; a universe that became an experiment with an unknown results. We are part of this experiment. A final result does not imply an “end” of the universe. Also, this open universe means a universe in which knowledge can be created. According to Gurdjieff, knowledge is a material thing and, at any given point of time, there is a finite amount of knowledge, and this knowledge is distributed to those who seek this knowledge. But Gurdjieff didn’t look into the problem of how knowledge is created, so to say.
“I am now speculating about that. We, third density beings, can seek knowledge and use this knowledge, but we can’t really create knowledge. To create knowledge, perhaps you must have a different kind of consciousness; you must be a higher density being. So, a higher density being can create knowledge, but cannot use it because using it involves time.
“We have this concept of macro and micro, and of course, we have no idea of what happens, how time is perceived, if at all, for consciousness at the level of atoms or molecules. So, maybe at that level, things go really crazy and only smoothes out when we view from a macro scale. This may be the case of the relation of 4th density to 3rd density. And thus, we have quantum theory with quantum jumps, and these quantum jumps are caused by this chaotic space-time structure on a micro scale, while the chaotic space-time structure of 3rd density causes quantum jumps in 4th density. But, I am just speculating.
“Think of a water wheel. The water flowing over it looks pretty smooth and it moves with a smooth motion. But, if you try to follow the path of each water molecule, you will find that it is very turbulent. So, somehow all this turbulent motion, when looked at from a distance, when you zoom out, the turbulent motion of many, many different molecules, can appear as a single smooth event. When you see lightning, you see a big bolt of electricity; but, this lightning is composed of billions and billions of electric charges participating in an organized and turbulent motion.
“Roughly speaking, when lightning happens, you cannot reverse it. The little motion of each of these molecules can be reversed and put back. But, when they are organized into something that is orchestrated, and this is irreversible, you have a “tick” of time. I use the term lightening, but think of lightning that happens at a micro scale. Ticks of time, progress of time, is a kind of little lightning on the level of atoms or even below that, which is somehow recorded in some kind of consciousness. So, time has permitted, or induced, or enclosed the “knowledge” of this lightning strike!
“But, the point is, of course, that this knowledge need not be direct, because there are causes of causes of causes of causes etc, and when we become aware of the last link in a chain, the chain becomes “solidified” or materialized just as, at the final moment of condensation, the rain cloud becomes a “rain” cloud and not just a mass of vapors that will dissipate without producing rain.
“From another perspective: Time is, so to speak, a number of events at any given point of space. Time progresses when a number of events progress. What are events? Events are related to quantum jumps. There are big ones and small ones. Big ones we can see with our eyes or record with our instruments. But there are also small ones that occur on a micro scale that we are not aware of with our consciousness, but which may be discerned by another consciousness, which extends to the micro region, which is aware of that region, and by being aware it participates in these events and in this progression of time. From this point of view, the structure of time on a micro scale can be very chaotic because the number of events can vary drastically from place to place. But, again, the very concept of “place,” for a point of space, is not clear. What is space, what are points in space, what are places is yet to be understood.” [Jadczyk, 1999]
Now, let’s go back to Eliade for just a moment:
“In fact, the myths of many peoples allude to a very distant epoch when men knew neither death nor toil nor suffering and had a bountiful supply of food merely for the taking. In ‘illo tempore,‘ the gods descended to earth and mingled with men; for their part, men could easily mount to heaven. As the result of a ritual fault, communications between heaven and earth were interrupted and the gods withdrew to the highest heavens. Since then, men must work for their food and are no longer immortal.” [Eliade, 1954]
What is the nature of this “ritual fault?” The Cassiopaeans refer to it as “DNA restructuring” at the hands of negative 4th density beings known as Reptoids or The Serpent in Eden. Don Juan called it the “predators who gave us their mind,” which seems to be essentially, the same thing. The most ancient source we can find, the tablets of the Sumerians, identifies it as a “flaw” in the king… the king is wounded and must be healed. And this is how it has come down to us in the Grail Stories as well. Can we learn anything more about this event, the mechanics of it, and possibilities of tracking it through history and identifying the illusions it forces upon us even now, in the present “time?”
And, if we can find and see and contemplate these illusions, can we then use this discipline as a yogi does, with help from many sources, to change our very DNA and escape the time loop? I think we can. It is not an easy thing, but if one can do it, then two can… and if two can do it… we can change the world.
Castaneda, Carlos  The Active Side of Infinity
Eliade, Mircea  The Myth of The Eternal Return, or Cosmos and History; New York; Bollingen Foundation
Jadczyk, Arkadiusz  Ad Hoc Speculations on Time
Ouspensky, P.D.  In Search of The Miraculous; New York, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich
Parpola, Simo  The Assyrian Tree of Life: Tracing the Origins of Jewish Monotheism and Greek Philosophy; Journal of Near Eastern Studies: 52