FOTCM Logo
Cassiopaea
  • EN
  • FR
  • DE
  • RU
  • TR
  • ES
  • ES

The Fifth Column

The Fifth Column. Emilio Mola Vidal, a Nationalist general during the Spanish Civil War (1936-39), originally coined the term. As four of his army columns moved on Madrid, the general referred to his militant supporters within the capital as his “fifth column,” intent on undermining the loyalist government from within. So the fifth column is a group of secret sympathizers or supporters of an enemy that engage in espionage or sabotage within defense lines or national borders.

Two days ago when a member of the signs team picked up on Gordon Thomas’ piece about David Kelly – and other microbiologists – one item stood out with horrifying clarity:

The 59-year-old British scientist was involved with ultra secret work at Israel’s Institute for Biological Research. Israeli sources claim Kelly met institute scientists several times in London in the past two years. […]

There have been persistent reports that the institute is also engaged in DNA sequencing research. One former member of the Knesset, Dedi Zucker, caused a storm in the Israeli Parliament when he claimed that the institute was “trying to create an ethnic specific weapon” in which Arabs could be targeted by Israeli weapons.

This little remark stood out like a thread dangling from a sweater that you just know if you pull on it, the whole garment will unravel.

All day long, in the heat of the Signs Bull-pen, (it has been fluctuating between 107 and 109 F here in the South of France), the staff pulled on this thread. The result was yesterday’s collection of articles – undoubtedly only the tip of the ice-berg – about the history of “Ethnic Specific Weapons.”

We thought, of course, that we had pretty much plumbed the depth of human depravity in our scouring the world for the Signs of the Times.

But we were wrong.

Ethnic Specific Weapons.

Just think about that term for a moment.

Then think about the horrifying statement published in the London Times in 1998:

A scientist there said the task was hugely complicated because both Arabs and Jews are of Semitic origin. But he added: “They have, however, succeeded in pinpointing a particular characteristic in the genetic profile of certain Arab communities, particularly the Iraqi people.”

The collection of articles continues, exposing with dreadful clarity that the Nazi dream of “Global Ethnic Cleansing” is STILL the goal of the Global Elitists.

I have mentioned on a few occasions that we have been digging deep into the origins of Judaism and its reprise as Zionism, and have found very strong links between the Jewish priestly tribe, the Levites, and the Aryan Luvites, the priestly tribe of the Hittites. What the evidence seems to show is that the rank and file of Jews are virtually identical to the rank and file Arab population.

What could this mean to us today, if anything?

Many scholars have promoted the idea that Jews and Europeans are on opposite ends of scales of ethnocentrism. This seems to be most aggressively promoted by Jews themselves:

[In] Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (Shahak & Mezvinsky 1999), Shahak and Mezvinsky argue that present-day fundamentalists attempt to recreate the life of Jewish communities before the Enlightenment (i.e., prior to about 1750). During this period the great majority of Jews believed in Cabbala Jewish mysticism. Influential Jewish scholars like Gershom Scholem ignored the obvious racialist, exclusivist material in the Cabbala by using words like ‘men’, ‘human beings’, and ‘cosmic’ to suggest the Cabbala has a universalist message.

The actual text says salvation is only for Jews, while non-Jews have ‘Satanic souls’ (p. 58).

The ethnocentrism apparent in such statements was not only the norm in traditional Jewish society. It remains a powerful current of contemporary Jewish fundamentalism, with important implications for Israeli politics. For example, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, describing the difference between Jews and non-Jews:

We do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of …a totally different species…. The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world […]

The difference of the inner quality [of the body] […] is so great that the bodies would be considered as completely different species.

This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews [as opposed to the bodies of Jews] ‘their bodies are in vain’.[…]

An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness. (In Shahak & Mezvinsky 1999, 59,60)

This claim of Jewish uniqueness echoes Holocaust activist Elie Wiesel’s (1985, 153) claim that ‘everything about us is different.’ Jews are ‘ontologically’ exceptional.

But where did this idea really come from?

In his book, The Search for The Perfect Language, Umberto Eco documents the fact that Judaism was dying among the Jews that had refugeed to Europe after the destruction of Palestine by the Romans. Hebrew was, in fact, a dead language and had to be “reinvented.” However, there was a very strange “covenant” between the priests of Judaism and the Frankish Church of the time which mandated the revivification of Judaism and the validation of the Hebrew Bible as being “delivered” from God to Adam to the Jews to Christianity. In other words, it was necessary to validate Judaism in order to then “validate” Christianity as the “one true religion.”

Why were the Levites and the Franks so friendly with each other?

In the 11th century, Isaac ibn Yashush, a Jewish court physician in Muslim Spain, mentioned the distressing fact that a list of Edomite kings that appears in Genesis 36 named a few kings who lived long after Moses was already dead. Ibn Yashush suggested the obvious, that the list was written by someone who lived after Moses. He became known as “Isaac the Blunderer.”

The guy who memorialized clever Isaac this way was a fellow named Abraham ibn Ezra, a 12th century rabbi in Spain. But Ibn Ezra presents us with a paradox because he also wrote about problems in the text of the Torah. He alluded to several passages that appeared not to be from Moses’ own hand because they referred to Moses in the third person, used terms Moses would not have known, described places that Moses had never been, and used language that belonged to an altogether different time and place than the milieu of Moses. He wrote, very mysteriously, “And if you understand, then you will recognize the truth. And he who understands will keep silent.”

Keep in mind, the entire Christian mythos was predicated upon the validity of Judaism, (being its “New Covenant”), and even if there was apparent conflict between Jews and Christians, the Christians most desperately needed to validate Judaism and its claim to be the revelation to the “chosen people” of the One True God. It was on that basis that Jesus was the Son of God, after all.

The great Jewish scholar, Rashi de Troyes, (1040-1105), made the astonishingly frank statement that the Genesis narrative, going back to the creation of the world, was written to justify what we might now call genocide. The God of Israel, who gave his people the Promised Land, had to be unequivocally supreme so that neither the dispossessed Canaanites nor anyone else could ever appeal against his decrees. Rashi’s precise words were that God told us the creation story and included it in the Torah “to tell his people that they can answer those who claim that the Jews stole the land from its original inhabitants. The reply should be; God made it and gave it to them but then took it and gave it to us. As he made it and it’s his, he can give it to whoever he chooses “.

Tracking the ethnic groups by various means, as they moved back and forth in the past, has been difficult, if almost impossible at present, due to the many “revisions” of history by the “conquerors” of any given period. But the science of genetics has given us some assistance, and we have used many “Sherlock Holmes” type clues extracted from ancient documents as well.

This led to the discovery that the Franks were formerly known, in the most ancient documentary evidence, as the Chatti. Those of you who are up on your ancient history will immediately recognize the fact that “Chatti” was another name for Hittites. (For the full implications of this fact, read Who Wrote the Bible?)

The ongoing dispute between the “Aaronic Jews” and the “Mosaic Jews” that is revealed in my series: “Who Wrote the Bible” leads us to consider the fact that the many peoples occupying Palestine at a certain period of history (known as a “dark age”) were basically “assimilated” to a “new religion” imposed upon them by a specific, small group of men. This small group of men had, as it happens, a specific genetic marker – a “Cohen gene.” It distinguishes this particular “tribe” from all other Jews and is remarkably consistent for the past 4,000 years. Geneticists have, in fact, tracked its “origin” back to about 1600 BC, right about the time of the fall of the Bronze Age and the eruption of the Volcano Thera on the Island of Santorini.

This leads us to ask the obvious question: could it be possible that the only Jews that would be spared from the deployment of an Ethnic Specific Weapon would be those with the Cohen genes? That is to say, a relatively small percentage of Jews as a whole?

And if there is a link between the Cohen tribe and the Hittites, would that not suggest that Hitler’s dream could be a reality in a very short time: all Semites would be wiped from the face of the planet?

Done, of course, in the most fiendish way of all: a fifth column invasion and take-over from within – a veritable Trojan Horse of Judaism with Aryan Levites hiding inside.

As long as we are speculating about Ethnic Specific Weapons, let’s look at it from the other direction. If the fundamentalist Jews are so convinced that they belong to an entirely different species than the rest of the world, what’s to stop them from developing an Ethnic Specific Weapon for Europeans????

I’m sure that the intelligence agencies that are assisting in this project have considered such a possibility, even given the numerous occurrences of “failure of intelligence.” What is, of course, so striking is the most mysterious “covenant” between the Jews and their traditional persecutors.

[The theoretical possibility of Ethnic Specific Weapons] was recognized over 25 years ago, if not before. It was originally brought to the attention of potential customers with the publication of an article in the Military Review of November 1970.

This journal for command-level military personnel was published by the US Army Command and General Staff College in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. The feature, entitled “Ethnic Weapons,” authored by Carl A. Larson, outlines the history, desirability, and possibilities of engineered biological pathogens which would affect only those races which historically have no natural defense against certain “enzyme inhibitors.”

Larson is listed as head of the “Department of Human Genetics at the Institute of Genetics, Lund, Sweden” as well as a licensed physician. […]

Larson explains that many of the chemical activities and functions within the human body are caused by the interactions of enzymes. One of the more significant activities enabled by enzyme chemical reactions are the contraction and relaxation of muscle tissue. If the activities of these enzymes are blocked, the victim will be paralyzed, even to the point of death by asphyxiation.

Not coincidentally, the enzyme-blocking action of compounds called organophosphates were discovered in Germany in the 1930s when experimental insecticides killed the people unlucky enough to have used them. This discovery led to the mass production of a substance named “Trilon,” later used to impressive effect in the extermination of groups of people the Nazis considered little more than insects. This substance and others of similar makeup became known as “nerve gas.” […]

According to Charles Piller and Keith Yamamoto in their 1988 book Gene Wars, Larson’s article was the first time that the subject of ethnically targeted CBWs was broached publicly, and that in “the military’s private circles it was old news.”

In short, the work that Kelly – and others – have been engaged in, ostensibly under the sponsorship of Israel, was actually begun in Nazi Germany, and the targets were Jews. The remark that the information given in Larson’s article was “old news” in military circles suggests that it was part of ongoing research by the US Black Ops gang, and was most likely brought to the US after World War II via Operation Paperclip.

Convinced that German scientists could help America’s postwar efforts, President Harry Truman agreed in September 1946 to authorize “Project Paperclip,” a program to bring selected German scientists to work on America’s behalf during the “Cold War.” However, Truman expressly excluded anyone found “to have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazism or militarism.”

Aside from the absurdity of the conditions set by Truman – any functioning German Scientists was obviously engaged in Nazi oriented research – the War Department’s Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA) conducted background investigations of the scientists.

In February 1947, JIOA Director Bosquet Wev submitted the first set of scientists’ dossiers to the State and Justice Departments for review. The Dossiers were damning. Samuel Klaus, the State Departments representative on the JIOA board, claimed that all the scientists in this first batch were “ardent Nazis.” Their visa requests were denied.

What a surprise! But, not to be put off, it was decided that beating up on the Nazis was counterproductive to the “best interests of the U.S.” And few Jews, if any, have ever protested this deliberate slap in their faces, all the while they hunted down any of the Nazis that were not terribly useful to the U.S., and made public spectacles of them.

Wev wrote a memo warning that “the best interests of the United States have been subjugated to the efforts expended in ‘beating a dead Nazi horse.'” He also declared that the return of these scientists to Germany, where they could be exploited by America’s enemies, presented a “far greater security threat to this country than any former Nazi affiliations which they may have had or even any Nazi sympathies that they may still have.”

What was wrong with handing them over to the Nuremberg Tribunal?

Obviously, that didn’t happen. When the JIOA formed to investigate the backgrounds and form dossiers on the Nazis, the Nazi Intelligence leader Reinhard Gehlen met with the CIA director Allen Dulles. Dulles and Gehlen hit it off immediately, Gehlen was a master spy for the Nazis and had infiltrated Russia with his vast Nazi Intelligence network. Dulles promised Gehlen that his Intelligence unit was safe in the CIA.

Dulles had the scientists dossier’s re-written to eliminate incriminating evidence.

Allen Dulles delivered the Nazi Intelligence unit to the CIA, which later opened many umbrella projects stemming from Nazi “mad-scientist” research. (MK-ULTRA / ARTICHOKE, OPERATION MIDNIGHT CLIMAX) By 1955, more than 760 German scientists had been granted citizenship in the U.S. and given prominent positions in the American scientific community. Many had been longtime members of the Nazi party and the Gestapo, had conducted experiments on humans at concentration camps, had used slave labor, and had committed other war crimes. Some of their sick experiments were carried out as far back as 1951 on Blacks working at the Mechanicsburg, PA Naval Supply Depot.

In a 1985 expose in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Linda Hunt wrote that she had examined more than 130 reports on Project Paperclip subjects–and every one “had been changed to eliminate the security threat classification.”

People tend to forget that Blacks were also targeted by Hitler and Co. This, of course, raises the interesting question about Condoleeza Rice’s recent rant about how great Bush and Co. and the Israelis are – never mind that they are developing Ethnic Specific Weapons that might target Condi-doll herself!

A two-part story in the Washington Post on April 20 and 21 revealed that biological agents developed by the South African government during its apartheid days have fallen into private hands. Written by Post reporters Joby Warrick and John Mintz, the piece noted that unique, race-specific strains of biotoxins were available on the world market – for the right price or the right ideology.

So, we have this strange problem in front of us: Ethnic Specific Weapons being developed by Israel as a continuation of a Nazi project designed to target Jews.

We have George Bush, grandson of a man who financially supported the Nazis, president of a country run by secret agencies that have been working on Rockefeller funded ideas of “Ethnic Cleansing” for the past 100 years, surrounding himself with Jews and Blacks in his cabinet and among his “friends.” This Ethnic Cleansing has traditionally and ALWAYS targeted Jews and Blacks. The traditions of the Bush Family have always been to support the Nazi agenda. In fact, the ideas of ethnic cleansing taken up by the Nazis, began in America.

And yet, it is the Israelis who are working on these projects… And nobody seems to be concerned that if Israel is doing it, might they not develop one just for Europeans?

That this question is NOT being asked suggests an even more covert agenda. If it’s not being asked, it’s because somebody already has the answer:

It was not lost on us that it was Dutch traders who tricked the Native Americans out of Manhattan Island for a few strings of beads. It was Dutch traders who initiated the slave trade with the New World. It was Dutch Traders who were responsible for the invasion and take-over of South Africa and the resulting Apartheid. And we certainly ought not to forget the Dutch trader’s involvement with China and India and the repressive regimes there. Looking at the history of the Dutch as a merchant society, we had to consider openly certain questions about “competitive trade” and Capitalism in general. The reader may wish to refer to our article: Official Culture in America for more details.

The Dutch seem to be a rather pure remnant of the Rhineland Franks – the same Franks that used to be called the Chatti – the same Chatti that were also known as Hittites, whose priestly tribe was known as Luvian – or Luvites.

And so, we wonder if Hitler – supported by such loyal Americans as Prescott Bush – was set up to implement the “dirty work” of exterminating the Jews so that America could be cast in the drama as the “savior of the Jews.” And then, of course, the Jews could be petted and praised and cultivated so that they would use their superior brains to finish the job.

Of course, this job of “containing” the Semitic genes was begun long ago, it is clear. It seems to have been important to someone back then to not allow the rank and file Semitic genetics to corrupt that pure, Aryan/Levite line… And the Jews were told by their leaders to keep their genes to themselves:

We do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of …a totally different species…. The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world […]

The difference of the inner quality [of the body] […] is so great that the bodies would be considered as completely different species.

An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness. (In Shahak & Mezvinsky 1999, 59,60)

This just happens to be exactly what the Aryans think about themselves and have done so from time immemorial. It only became a doctrine of Judaism in Medieval times…

One can only think again of the Fifth Column – a Trojan Horse…

Originally Published 2003_08_11

Related Articles: