Contrails or Chemtrails?

I have found your Web Site last week & I found it extremely interesting. Also very Frightening.

Seems like the Humans here don’t have much of a chance. You & the Cass’s covered many topics but what I’de like to know is what they say about these Contrails or Chemtrails that thousands of people have been spotting all over the world.

Also about Sheldon Nidle’s readings.Are they really on the level or false information? Hope you can answer these questions. Your sight is out of sight.Keep it up!! Sid

Dear Sid,

Thank you for your interest, but put away your fear. Fear is only useful to teach us something and once we have the knowledge about that which is fearful, it becomes less so wouldn’t you say? Yes, a poisonous serpent is a very frightening thing, but we can learn about them and thereby lessen our chances of being bitten. We can learn to wear protective clothing and boots, and also to avoid their habitat. This is equivalent to gaining knowledge about the true nature of the reality in which we live.

As to your questions: The Cassiopaeans, in their repeated urgings for us to use our most valuable commodity, our brains, would suggest that you research all sides of the question before deciding what YOU think about the contrails/chemtrails. This would include writing letters or calling various authorities who might be able to provide information to you and others if only asked. Yes, they could be lying to cover up some nefarious activity, but it may not be what is thought by the various rumor-mongers who so actively seek to keep us all confused and off-balance.

We did recently ask a question about it:

Q: (L) There are a lot of rumors flying around about contrails being a dumping of chemicals or bacterial agents or something otherwise detrimental into the atmosphere, and that this is what is making everybody sick. Is there any truth to this rumor?
A: Not much, but in isolated instances, yes.

Now, this answer doesn’t make the rumor-mongers happy. BUT, when you consider it logically, it makes sense. For example: I know of a number of people in the private sector who are chemists and have access to laboratory facilities in their jobs. It would be a simple matter of collecting air samples and submitting them to chemical or other analysis, the results of which could be broadcast with definite sources, and which would either indict the perpetrators of such activity, or clear them from blame. But, have you found anything of this nature? I haven’t. I have searched and written inquiries, and there does not seem to be anything but anecdotal evidence, for the most part.

Now, there do seem to be some rare instances, as the Cassiopaeans note above, where illness is directly related to some sort of atmospheric dump and even deliberate “poisoning” of the atmosphere, but I think that it is going too far to attribute the many contrails around the world to this type of activity as a general declaration. To do so is absolutely irresponsible! There are other possible scenarios. And, yes, I have witnessed this activity – particularly in the spring of 1998 – and noted seeming weather anomalies that followed as well as hearing a lot of people relating their flu or other respiratory problems to these. The only thing is: the spread of flu or other respiratory problems is not statistically any more significant in relation to contrails than it has been at other times.

Your other question relates to this question of “rumor mongering” in a significant way: Sheldon Nidle and his well publicized information which could be said to have been enormously contributory to the Heaven’s Gate Suicides.

Let me paste in some remarks by the Cassiopaeans that relate specifically to this type of thing, though neither I nor the Cassiopaeans would pass a judgment or opinion of Mr. Nidle himself:

Session date: January 26, 1996:
Q: (L) Sheldon Nidle has written a book called “Becoming a Galactic Human.” He has said that the Earth is going to go into a photon belt sometime this summer, that there is going to be 3 days of darkness, and the poo is going to hit the fan, so to speak, the aliens are going to land in the late summer or the fall, and they are all coming here to help us. Could you comment on these predictions? Is a fleet of aliens going to land on Earth and be announced by the media in 1996?
A: No.
Q: (P) In 1997?
A: No.
Q: (L) Could you comment on the source of this book: “Three days of Darkness,” by Divine Mercy which also says there is going to be 3 days of darkness in 1998?
A: Why does this continue to be such a popular notion? And, why is everyone so obsessed with, are you ready for this, trivia…? Does it matter if there is three days of darkness?!? Do you think that is the “be all and end all?” What about the reasons for such a thing?… at all levels, the ramifications? It’s like describing an atomic war in prophecy by saying: “Oh my, oh my, there is going to be three hours of a lot of big bangs, oh my!!”
Q: (L) Well, you didn’t say it wasn’t going to happen in the fall of 1998. Is it?
A: First of all, as we have warned you repeatedly, it is literally impossible to attach artificially conceived calendar dates to any sort of prophecy or prediction for the many reasons that we have detailed for you numerous times. [Note: the ‘fluid’ nature of the future. Probability, etc.] And we have not said that this was going to happen.
Q: (L) I know that you are saying that this 3 days of darkness is trivial considering the stupendous things that are involved in realm crossings and the transition to 4th density. But, a lot of these people are interpreting this as just 3 days of darkness.. then wake up in paradise. I would like to have some sort of response to this question.
A: You should already know that to attempt apply 3rd density study and interpretations to 4th density events and realities is useless in the extreme… This is why UFO researchers keep getting 3 new questions for every 1 answer they seek with their “research.”
Q: (P) What about the apparitions of the Virgin Mary at Conyers, GA, as well as this book “Mary’s Message to the World” and all the other messages about the End Times that are coming out all over?
A: The forces at work here are far too clever to be accurately anticipated so easily. You never know what twists and turns will follow, and they are aware of prophetic and philosophcval patternings and usually shift course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed futures.
Q: (L) The question on my mind is: who is giving information to Sheldon Nidle about the photon belt and the mass landings that are supposed to take place on the 31st of December and the 1st of January?
A: Sheldon Nidle.
Q: (L) There are a lot of people who are convinced by Sheldon Nidle that there is going to be a photon belt and a mass landing of UFOs in the fall of this year. Is this, in fact, going to occur?
A: People are very convinced by Bo and Peep.
Q: (L) So, I don’t really need to go on because all of this is nonsense. Now, this guy here who channels this being called K____ writes an article about the metaphysical Christ. I read this article and really liked it. It says here that the Milky Way galaxy is part of a system of loosely 20 other galaxies. Is this true?
A: Too vague, all systems can be measured thusly if desired. Also a system of every conceivable combination.
Q: (L) In any event, it says that all of these universes expand at the rate of 90% of the speed of light. The ultimate central sun of it all is what we vaguely call God.
A: We have already covered these areas and “God” is “Everything,” not a central sun.
Q: (L) Well, he is talking about this 25 thousand year cycle where the earth passes into a photon belt that circles the Pleiadean system, and, when this photon belt hits us it is going to make all kinds of changes and it one of the small cycles, and the harmonic convergence is…
A: Fragmented channel.
Q: (L) Is there such a thing as the harmonic convergence?
A: If you wish to converge harmonically, you may.
Q: (L) So there is no photon belt circling around the Pleiades that hits us every 25,000 years?
A: If this was true, don’t you think we would have informed you by now?
Q: (L) Well, if it is “fragmented,” that means that it can be partially accurate. Could you talk to us a little bit about the origins of this idea of a purported “Photon Belt?”
A: The key issue remains one of interpretation. The messages are genuine; interpretations are variable in their accuracy. So, when one speaks of the “Photon Belt,” one may really be thinking of a concept and giving it a name.
Q: (L) So, you mean that various persons are seeing something and only describing it within the limits of their knowledge?
A: At one level, yes.
Q: (L) Was there a harmonic convergence as was advertised within the metaphysical community?
A: For those who believed there was a harmonic convergence, indeed there was a harmonic convergence.
Q: (L) Did anything of a material nature happen on or to the planet to enhance or change the energy?
A: Did you notice any changes?
Q: (L) No. Except that it seems that things have gotten worse, if anything.
A: Did you notice any clear, obvious, material changes?
Q: (L) No. But that could just be me. I could just be a stubborn and skeptical person.
A: Did anyone else in the room notice any clear or obvious changes?
Q: (S) What date was it? (L) 8/8/88, I believe. (S) I thought it had something to do with 11/11 ninety- something…
A: Well, obviously if the recollection of the calendar date was difficult, one would suppose that material changes did not take place. For, if they had, would you not remember the calendar date ascribed to them?
Q: (L) Yes. The claim has further been made that, for a month, following the harmonic convergence that no abductions were taking place. Is this true?
A: No. There has been no cessation in what you term to be abduction in quite some time as you measure it.

From session 03-23-96:
A: Now, for the remainder of this session, we wish to address the so called earth changes for your benefit, as you are stuck here. Those present need to be equipped to stop buying into popular deceptions once and for all! Reread Bramley. All such changes are caused by three things and three things only!

1) Human endeavors.

2) Cosmic objects falling upon or too near earth.

3) Planetary orbital aberrations.

Don’t believe any of the nonsense you hear from other sources. It is designed to facilitate mass programming and deception. Just as your bible says; “You will know not the day, nor the hour.” This means there is no warning. None. No clue. No prophecy. And these events are of the “past” as well.
Q: (L) Well, since you put ‘human endeavors” at the top of the list, am I to infer that perhaps some of the activities of the consortium, the secret government, are going to precipitate some of these events?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, you’ve said that there’s a comet cluster that’s coming this way. Is that still correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is this body that has been called Hale-Bopp, is this that comet cluster?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this comet cluster that’s coming, still supposed to arrive anywhere between now and 18 years, something like that, is that correct?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) Now, is this something that can be seen from a great way off?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this something that’s going to impact our particular immediate location, and appear suddenly, as this comet that has flown overhead just did? Nobody saw it until a very short time ago, and all of a sudden everybody sees it?
A: The cluster is a symptom, not the focus.
Q: (V) What is the focus?
A: Wave, remember, is “realm border” crossing… what does this imply? Consult your knowledge base for Latin roots and proceed.
Q: (L) So, the Latin root of realm is regimen, which means a domain or rulership or a system for the improvement of health. Does this mean that, and as I assume we are now moving into the STO realm, now, out of the STS realm?
A: Partly.
Q: (L) And also, can I infer from this, that the comet cluster exists in the other realm?
A: Partly.
Q: (L)Well, previously, you had said that the comet cluster would come before the realm border. Which indicated that the comet…
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, the comet cluster. That comet cluster, is, I am assuming, a real body, in third density experience, right? A part of a real cluster of bodies in third density experience. Is that correct?
A: Cluster can approach from all directions.
Q: (L) So, can I infer from what has been said, that we are going to move into this comet cluster, as into a realm?
A: Border changes rules.
Q: (L) But if we run into the comet cluster before we cross the border, then, I mean, I would understand if we were going into the realm border first…
A: Part in part out.
Q: (L) OK, is this so-called HAARP project instrumental in any of these realm border changes, these realm changes?
A: All is interconnected, as usual.

From session 11-26-1994:
A: Now would be a good “time” for you folks to begin to reexamine some of the extremely popular “Earth Changes” prophecies. Why, you ask. Because, remember, you are third density beings, so real prophecies are being presented to you in terms you will understand, I.E. physical realm, I.E. Earth changes. This “may” be symbolism. Would most students of the subject understand if prophecies were told directly in fourth density terms?
Q: (L) Is this comparable to my idea about dream symbolism. For example, the dream I had about the curling cloud which I saw in a distance and knew it was death dealing and I interpreted it to be a tornado, but it was, in fact, a dream of the Challenger disaster. I understood it to be a tornado, but in fact, what I saw was what I got, a death dealing force in the sky, a vortex, in the distance. I guess my dream was a fourth density representation but I tried to interpret it in terms I was familiar with. Is this what you mean?
A: Close. But it is easy for most to get bogged down by interpreting prophecies in literal terms.
Q: (L) In terms of these Earth Changes, Edgar Cayce is one of the most famous prognosticators of recent note, a large number of the prophecies he made seemingly were erroneous in terms of their fulfillment. For example, he prophesied that Atlantis would rise in 1969, but it did not though certain structures were discovered off the coast of Bimini which are thought by many to be remnants of Atlantis. These did, apparently, emerge from the sand at that time.
A: Example of one form of symbolism.
Q: (L) Well, in terms of this symbolism, is it that you were read the event from 3rd density into sixth density terms and then transmit it back into 3rd, and while the ideation is deeply and symbolically correct, the exact specifics, in 3rd density terms, can be askew depending upon the “spin” given to it by the receiver? . Is that what we are dealing with here?
A: 99.9 per cent would not understand that concept. Most are always looking for literal translations of data. Analogy is novice who attends art gallery, looks at abstract painting and says “I don’t get it.”
Q: (L) Well, let’s not denigrate literal translations or at least attempts to get things into literal terms. I like realistic art work. I am a realist in my art preferences. I want trees to look like trees and people to have only two arms and legs. Therefore, I also like some literalness in my prognostications.
A: Some is okay, but, beware or else “California falls into the ocean” will always be interpreted as California falling into the ocean.
Q: [General uproar] (F) Wait a minute, what was the question? (L) I just said I liked literalness in my prophecies. (F) Oh, I know what they are saying. People believe that California is just going to go splat and that Phoenix is going to be on the seacoast, never mind that it’s at 1800 feet elevation, it’s just going to drop down to sea level, or the sea level is going to rise, but it’s not going to affect Virginia Beach even though that’s at sea level. I mean… somehow Phoenix is just going to drop down and none of the buildings are going to be damaged, even though its going to fall 1800 feet… (T) Slowly. It’s going to settle. (F) Slowly?! It would have to be so slowly it’s unbelievable how slowly it would have to be. (T) It’s been settling for the last five million years, we’ve got a ways to go in the next year and a half! (F) Right! That’s my point. (T) In other words, when people like Scallion and Sun Bear and others say California is going to fall into the ocean, they are not saying that the whole state, right along the border is going to fall into the ocean, they are using the term California to indicate that the ocean ledge along the fault line has a probability of breaking off and sinking on the water side, because it is a major fracture. We understand that that is not literal. Are you telling us that there is more involved here as far as the way we are hearing what these predictions say?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) So, when we talk about California falling into the ocean, we are not talking about the whole state literally falling into the ocean?
A: In any case, even if it does, how long will it take to do this?
Q: (LM) It could take three minutes or three hundred years. (T) Yes. That is “open” as you would say.
A: Yes. But most of your prophets think it is not open.
Q: (T) So, when we are talking: “California will fall into the ocean, which is just the analogy we are using, we are talking about, as far as earth changes, is the possibility that several seismic events along the fault line, which no one really knows the extent of…
A: Or it all may be symbolic of something else.
Q: (L) Such as? Symbolic of what?
A: Up to you to examine and learn.
Q: (L) Now, wait a minute here! That’s like sending us out to translate a book in Latin without even giving us a Latin dictionary.
A: No it is not. We asked you to consider a reexamination.
Q: (L) You have told us through this source, that there is a cluster of comets connected in some interactive way with our solar system, and that this cluster of comets comes into the plane of the ecliptic every 3600 years. Is this correct?
A: Yes. But, this time it is riding realm border wave to 4th level, where all realities are different. Q: (L) Okay, so the cluster of comets is riding the realm border wave. Does this mean that when it comes into the solar system, that its effect on the solar system, or the planets within the solar system, (Jan or us), may or may not be mitigated by the fact of this transition? Is this a mitigating factor?
A: Will be mitigated.
Q: (L) Does any of this mean that the earth changes that have been predicted, may not, in fact, occur in physical reality as we understand it?
A: You betcha.
Q: (L) Does this mean that all of this running around and hopping and jumping to go here and go there and do this and do that is…
A: That is strictly 3rd level thinking.
Q: (L) Now, if that is 3rd level thinking, and if a lot of these things are symbolic, I am assuming they are symbolic of movement or changes in energy.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And, if these changes in energy occur does this mean that the population of the planet are, perhaps, in groups or special masses of groups, are they defined as the energies that are changing in these descriptions of events and happenings of great cataclysm. Is it like a cataclysm of the soul on an individual and or collective basis?
A: Close.
Q: (L) When the energy changes to 4th density, and you have already told us that people who are moving to 4th density when the transition occurs, that they will move into 4th density, go through some kind of rejuvenation process, grow new teeth, or whatever, what happens to those people who are not moving to 4th density, and who are totally unaware of it? Are they taken along on the wave by, in other words, piggy-backed by the ones who are aware and already changing in frequency, or are they going to be somewhere else doing something else?
A: Step by step. Q: (T) In other words, we are looking at the fact that what’s coming this time is a wave that’s going to allow the human race to move to 4th density?
A: And the planet and your entire sector of space/time.
Q: (T) Is that what this whole plan is about, then, if I may be so bold as to include all of us here in this. We, of the beings of light who have come here into human form, to anchor the frequency, is this what we are anchoring it for, for this wave, so that when it comes enough of us will be ready, the frequency will be set, so that the change in the planet can take place as it has been planned?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Okay, when the people are talking about the earth changes, when they talk in literal terms about the survivors, and those who are not going to survive, and the destruction and so forth and so on, in 3rd, 4th, 5th level reality we are not talking about the destruction of the planet on 3rd level physical terms, or the loss of 90 per cent of the population on the 3rd level because they died, but because they are going to move to 4th level?
A: Whoa! You are getting “warm.”
Q: (T) Okay. So, we are anchoring this. So, when they talk about 90 per cent of the population not surviving, it is not that they are going to die, but that they are going to transform. We are going to go up a level. This is what the whole light thing is all about?
A: Or another possibility is that the physical cataclysms will occur only for those “left behind” on the remaining 3rd level density earth.
Q: (T) Okay, what you are saying, then, is that we are anchoring the frequency, so that when the wave comes, we move to 4th level density as many people as possible, in order to break the hold the “Lizzies” have got on this planet, those who remain behind will not have enough energy left for the “Lizzies” to bother with the planet any longer. There will be less of them so the planet will be able to refresh and they will be able to move on in their lessons without interference?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Are we anchoring frequency to create a split of realities like cellular replication?
A: One developing conduit.
Q: (L) We are developing a conduit?
A: Yes. One.
Q: (J) How many conduits does the planet need?
A: Open.
Q: (T) What is the conduit for?
A: You and those who will follow you to 4th density.
Q: (L) This conduit. Is this a conduit through which an entire planet will transition?
A: You are one. There are others developing at this point.
Q: (J) So, at this point we are developing a conduit?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) There are other groups on this planet developing their own conduits?
A: Yes. Knowledge is the key to developing a conduit.
Q: (T) We’re developing a conduit to move us from 3rd density to 4th density. Once we have moved through the conduit does that mean we have completed what we came here to do, and that is anchor the frequency?
A: Partly.
Q: (T) Is the conduit kind of like an escape hatch for us?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Let me get this straight. When we move through this conduit, are the other…
A: You will be on the 4th level earth as opposed to 3rd level earth.
Q: (L) What I am trying to get here, once again, old practical Laura, is trying to get a handle on practical terms here. Does this mean that a 4th density earth and a 3rd density earth will coexist side by side…
A: Not side by side, totally different realms.
Q: (L) Do these realms interpenetrate one another but in different dimensions…
A: Close.
Q: (L) So, in other words, a being from say, 6th density, could look at this planet we call the earth and see it spinning through space and see several dimensions of earth, and yet the point of space/time occupation is the same, in other words, simultaneous. (J) They can look down but we can’t look up.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, in other words, while all of this cataclysmic activity is happening on the 3rd dimensional earth, we will be just on our 4th dimensional earth and this sort of thing won’t be there, and we won’t see the 3rd dimensional people and they won’t see us because we will be in different densities which are not “en rapport”, so to speak?
A: You understand concept, now you must decide if it is factual.

And, in the end, we must ALL decide what to believe or accept as “probable.” Any teaching that suggests a “backlash” for NOT doing something, or for not believing, is depriving you of your free will choice.