The Cassiopaeans and Ra

A reader comments:

You have some fascinating material on your website. I have noticed a remarkable similarity between the material you have channeled from the Cassiopaeans and the Ra Material, which was channeled in the late ’70’s and early 80’s, particularly in regard to the various densities, and service to self and service to others orientations. Are you aware of this, and have the Cassiopaeans ever commented on this?

Laura responds:

Yes, and, as a matter of fact, in one of the early Cassiopaean sessions, (which unfortunately was not recorded as we were not recording at that stage of the experiment, though we were keeping notes) we were told that the “Ra Material” was a sort of “primer” to what was going to be given to us. We all went out and started reading it…

As an aside, as I have pointed out elsewhere, in order to sustain a “higher level” contact, certain conditions must be met, and certain analogies can be drawn from our knowledge of physics, including electronics. I have analyzed the Ra contact to some considerable extent, and compared certain things to our own experiment, and I think that Carla, though the actual “channel,” was really more of a “ground” or “conduit” (speakers make a good analogy) that transduced the signal that was picked up by Don as the “antennae/receiver.” In our own case, this is also true. Frank is the “ground.” He can channel all kinds of stuff just about all day long.

It took a long period of working with Frank to “create the circuit” so that could “receive and transduce” more or less on my own. This was due to the fact that my analytical mind is in a state of constant surveillance and this was the only way to create a “balanced” state between the hemispheres of the brain. You could say that it was a sort of bio-feedback training to be able to receive and assess simultaneously.

The Ra Material was also a “group effort” of amazing import as it blazed a trail into realms beyond the psychic material delivered up to that time. It is unfortunate that the Ra group did no spend more time on dealing with the “attack and obfuscation” issues of the 4th density STS as it might have prevented the death of what I perceive as the “Ra Antennae/receiver,” Don Elkins.

Recently I inquired about this during a dialogue with several others who are interested in the Ra Material:

07-24-99
Q: I have been having a dialogue with a fellow on the net in the last week or so who is very well versed in the Ra Material. He sent me a large chunk of volume 5 of the Ra books, which was material that had not been released earlier. It seems that during the times that Don Elkins was asking some questions about different conspiracies and the nature of the 4th density STS manipulations and some other rather grim subjects, that there was some sort of judgment made by this group, or members of this group, that such subjects were not appropriate lines of questioning for an STO channel. They were, apparently, considered to be a ‘focusing on negative aspects’, therefore they were not of ‘love and light.’ Such questions and directions of questions were, therefore, discouraged or agreed by this group to be not desirable to pursue. Don Elkins DID, however, commit suicide. Can you tell us why?
A: Suicide is a chosen pathway for the purpose of close realization of shutting off the noise.
Q: I would like to understand. Here, these folks had this marvelous contact with Ra…
A: Contact with Ra does not preclude the possibility of attack.
Q: Why did Ra not convey to him the information necessary to understand that he was under attack, and what kind of attack it was, and how to deal with it?
A: The questions were not asked, and it would have been a violation of Free Will, i.e. the choice to focus only on “Love and Light.”
Q: So, because they were so focused on the love and light aspects…
A: There is no positivity without negativity. There is always negativity present, whether acknowledged or not.
Q: So, you are saying that if it is not acknowledged, placed on the table, so to speak, that it sort of ‘bites you’ no matter what? That, in some way it will manifest, and if a person goes to an extreme in terms of love and light, the negativity will come in the back door? That exclusive focus on ‘Love and Light’ effectively becomes darkness?
A: Close.

There were a couple of other mentions that were interesting:

10-23-94
Q: (L) We want to know about the this Ra Material by Elkins, Rueckert and McCarty, which you suggested we have a look at; where is the Ra Material coming from?
A: Us.
Q: (L) Would you say that the Ra Material comes through a clear channel?
A: Yes, in relative terms.

12-05-94
Q: (L) Are the 6th density Orions known as Transient Passengers?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So there are Transient Passengers that are STO as well as STS? A: TP is “wanderer”.
Q: (L) And what is a wanderer?
A: TP.
Q: (L) Well, the idea of the Wanderers, according to the Ra Material, is 4th or 5th density beings that have chosen to come back into 3rd density to help us. Would that be the same kind of Wanderer?
A: 5th or 6th density.

10-07-94
Q: (L) Okay, who created the Cassiopaeans?
A: Your super ancient spiritual ancestors.
Q: (L) Do these beings have a name? What are they called?
A: Transient passengers.

10-22-94
Q: (L) Now you mentioned the creators of your group as the super ancient ancestors called the transient passengers, what is the meaning of this term and who are these beings?
A: Transient passengers are not beings. Transient Passengers are unified thought form.
Q: (L) Why are they called transient passengers?
A: Because they transit all forms of reality. And they spring forth from the Unified form of existence.

11-16-94
Q: (L) You said something the other night when we lost the tape about the expansion of the star being conducive to creation. Could you give us a little bit on that aspect?
A: Transdimensional atomic remolecularization.
Q: (L) What is remolecularization.
A: Being reassembled.
Q: (L) Reassembled from what to what?
A: Complex. Density collision.
Q: (L) Collision of one density with another. Which? Does this mean that this was a point in space time when pure energy could form around a framework of a thought pattern and thus become solid matter?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Is this transitioning of energy from higher densities into third density or solid matter kind of a traumatic event for universal energy?
A: Subjective.
Q: (L) Is it a form of death?
A: Death and birth are the same.
Q: (L) Was it a requirement to be on a planet with a dying star for this remolecularization to take place?
A: If 3rd density remolecularization.
Q: (L) If the mother planet that the human race was seeded on originally, is burned up, or turned into a cinder, I would like to know how it burned up?
A: Star expanded.
Q: (L) Well, if the star expanded, it must have expanded recently, is that correct?
A: Time does not measure that way in that realm.
Q: (L) What realm is that?
A: Time/space warp.
Q: (L) What do you mean by a time/space warp?
A: Too complicated but you already have some understanding of concept.
Q: (L) So, the star expanded and the mother planet was turned into a cinder. If this was the case, it means that it must have turned into a cinder very close to the point, using time loosely, when human beings were created?
A: You can’t even use it loosely.
Q: (L) Would you help me out here. I’m trying to figure out why, if that planet was turned into a cinder, why were human beings seeded there… what was the point in being brought into being on a planet that was very shortly to become a cinder… a crispy critter…
A: Okay. Now: “Shocker” For you. It hasn’t become a cinder yet.
Q: (L) Okay. What is it. You told us it was a cinder… burned up… what is the real story here?
A: It will be at the same “time” that you go to 4th density. The human race is currently being formed on D’Ahnkiar.
Q: (L) What do you mean that the human race is currently being formed on that planet? Is that because that planet is this planet?
A: No. That closes realm grand cycle.
Q: (L) Are you saying that there are human beings being created on that planet at this current time…
A: Yes, you are. Your race is forming there.
Q: (L) How?
A: Realm crossing understand?
Q: (L) Are you saying that there are 4th density bodies being formed there…
A: No. 3rd.
Q: (L) There are 3rd density bodies… are we going to leave the bodies we are in and go into other bodies?
A: You are drifting… Think carefully. Realm is derivative of reality. Cycle.
Q: (L) So the human race is being formed on this other planet at the present time…
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And at the time of the realm border crossing, this other planet will then become cindered… burned up…
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where will the human beings go that are being formed on that planet at the time of the realm border crossing?
A: Ancient earth.
Q: (L) They will go to ancient earth? I don’t understand!
A: There is no time as you know it; its all just lessons for the collective consciousness.
Q: (L) So at the closing of this grand cycle everything will just start all over again?
A: Not exactly; you see, there is no start.
Q: (L) Are a lot of souls on the earth going to recycle into these new bodies coming onto the earth?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) As ancient mankind?
A: Yes. Q: (L) And do the whole thing all over again?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, in other words, a lot of people are going back to square one?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Is this punishment.
A: No. Nature.
Q: (L) Are some of the souls, at that point, going to move into a higher density level?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Could you give us a percentage on this?
A: No. Open at this point.
Q: (L) Now, getting back to the planet, if at some point in the cycle, bodies were generated on this planet and brought to earth, who brought them?
A: Realm crossing.
Q: (L) It was not a who, it was a what, is that correct?
A: All is who and what.
Q: (L) Well, the other night you mentioned something about the Transient Passengers hauling these bodies off that planet and bringing them to earth, is that correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, are these Transient Passengers Realms?
A: Yes. So are you.
Q: (L) Do you guys know what you are doing to the linear mind here?
A: Can of worms.
Q: (L) I guess ‘Worms R Us.’

08-11-96
Q: (L) OK, since the Ra material is considered to be a kind of primer to the Cassiopaean material, could you give us a percentage on the accuracy of this material?
A: 63
Q: (L) 63%, Well, that’s pretty good, considering the Free Will Noise Factor! (J) It’s not bad! (T) A lot of it’s very good stuff… (L) Can you talk to us a little bit about the concept of Wanderers? Is there anything about Wanderers that you can tell us, that would help us to identify them?
A: Specifics, please.
Q: (L) OK, is it a correct point of reference that Wanderers are individuals who feel alienated in the world system?
A: Yes but they can partially adapt.
Q: (L) OK, do they also sometimes have physical…
A: Revulsion to physicality.
Q: (T) Revulsion to physicality? They don’t like physicality? But they’re here! (J) Just because they’re here, they don’t have to like it! (L) OK, is that always a clue?
A: Yes. Q: (L) Anything else about them that… (J) Wait, I have another question. Revulsion to physicality, does that refer to a dislike of the fact that in 3rd density is all physical, and it’s fixed, as opposed to upper densities, where there’s variability?
A: 3rd density is not “all” physical.
Q: (L) Well, there’s spiritual… (J) I understand that, but the physical body itself, is fixed. (L) Well, I don’t think that’s what they’re getting at… (J) That’s what I’m asking. (L) I think that what they’re getting at is like a fine division between somebody who focuses on physical sensation as opposed to spiritual or mental or emotional sensation as being the point of reference.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And this is something that I was reading in this book the other day, that he talks about, the body is animal, and the soul is spirit. He says that animal people just seek animal experiences, and they glorify them, and they stimulate their physical sensations/emotions and starve the spiritual side so that the one grows stronger and stronger and the spirit sort of collapses into a tiny ball…
A: 3rd density natives tend to concentrate and to an extent, revel, in the physical.
Q: (T) And boy, they’re reveling right now! There’s major reveling going on. And it’s intensifying every day. (J) I think the point that I was trying to make was having to stay in 3rd density, would they miss the variability of physicality? (L) Well, Wanderers, remember, are 6th density beings. They are non-physical.
A: The lack.
Q: (T) The lack of spirituality?
A: Yes. Is missed. Not so much “miss,” as much as difficulty of adjustment.
Q: (J) Yes, like if you went blind, you’d miss being able to see, etc… (T) If you had the freedom of non-physicality, being limited, you’d miss the non-physical.

Carla will be including some of the Cassiopaean comments in her upcoming “Handbook for Wanderers.”

And I will be adding a link to their site, which I should have thought of doing long ago! Thanks for the reminder!