The Wave Chapter 68: As Above, So Below

I have spent a number of evenings debating with myself the planned content of this next chapter. On the one hand, the information is crucial; and on the other hand, there are some parts that are so extremely disturbing that when I examine them I have difficulty dealing with the images they conjure. So, the question became: how much do I really need to tell to make the point? Ought I just record the results of research and leave out how these results were obtained? Or does the reader have a right to know precisely how various researchers come to their conclusions?

As I was pondering this issue, something the Cassiopaeans once said came to my mind:

July 14, 1996

A: 3rd density STS orientation includes the thought of “dominion” over 2nd density, and this is merely a continuation of the energy buildup of the approach of the wave … some of the lessons are interesting indeed. When you assume that capture and imprisonment of those of lesser capacity than you is for “the good,” why should not you expect those of greater capacity than you to assume the same regarding you?!

This then led me to think about the Hermetic maxim, As above, so below; and certain implications that had never dawned on me began to shape themselves into a framework of understanding. I would like to share this with you.

In our world, we have many classes of people; many segments of the population that are engaged in many different pursuits, occupations, and fields of endeavor. All of these are more or less compartmentalized so that, very often, what one group is aware of and what they do is unavailable to other groups. There is a large, broad based group of your average Mr. and Mrs. Citizen, who are for the most part unaware of almost everything. They are born, live their lives in a normal way with all the normal accoutrements of an average life, including their normal allotment of momentous events such as school, graduations, the first job, marriages, births, deaths, football games, vacations to the seashore or mountains, friends, movies, and on and on. For the most part, it is all struggle to keep in step with the times and expectations of society.

In recent years, many polls have been conducted that ask the question: Are you happy with your life? A surprisingly high percentage of citizens respond: Yes. Why is this surprising? Because statistics show that mood disorders such as depression and anxiety are on the increase, becoming more widespread all the time. Depression related suicides are also on the rise. So, we have to ask the question: if everyone is so happy, why is depression at near epidemic proportions in our society?

It is clear that a huge segment our society is in denial. People cling to what they believe is the cultural norm, what is socially expected, and then pronounce themselves happy if they can come anywhere close to meeting it.

Twenty or more years ago, the individual who was on anti-depressant drugs was a rarity. Sure, they took an occasional Valium or Librium during times of crisis, but those are relatively harmless relaxants. Nowadays, practically every other person you talk to is either taking, or has a family member who is taking, Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Serzone, Tofranil, or any combination thereof. This is the ubiquitous medical solution to the epidemic of depression.

The psychosomatic network operates through a series of delicately balanced chemical interactions and feedback loops. The question of how drugs – legal or illegal – enter the network and affect the natural homeostatic balance is seldom addressed.

Drugs go to work at the level where brain cells are communicating with each other across synapses. Natural chemicals are squirted out by one or another cell and taken up by another. If there is too much of the chemical, the body has a mop up operation called a “re-uptake mechanism” by which the cell reabsorbs the excess. Many anti-depressants are used to block the re-uptake mechanism, allowing excess chemicals to flood the body. It is suggested that this corrects the imbalance.

The problem is, this Band-Aid approach does not measure what else may be going on in the body at the many other sites where these chemicals are also taken up by cells. One example is Prozac. Prozac works because it allows the body to be flooded with serotonin. It is now known that the intestines are loaded with serotonin receptors and that people on anti-depressants very often have gastrointestinal problems. The epidemic of digestive disorders is evidenced by the amazing number of television commercials advertising antacids.

I’m sure you’ve all seen the nice little drama of the young family at the circus with their excited children, only the family fun is about to be spoiled because the parents are suffering from – dare we say it – acid indigestion! And, of course, the fatherly pharmaceutical company in their infinite wisdom and mercy have just the solution.

Now, this is not to say that everyone who has acid indigestion is on anti-depressants, but the point is that such commercials normalize this. Just what are they trying to cover up? I wonder.

Nonetheless, it seems that for the most part even the medical professionals who are prescribing these drugs are not even asking questions. It’s easy to say that there is a conspiracy of doctors to drug the populace; but as most of us know, our physicians and nurses are mostly interested in healing, and they work with the system that is promoted by our culture as being the right method. They learn what they practice in medical schools, taught by professors who learned it from their teachers. The research that leads to the different concepts of healing is funded by – well, here we hit a curious thing – pharmaceutical companies. And, of course, pharmaceutical companies have a vested interest in making money from selling pharmaceuticals.

So, shall we blame the drug companies? Is it merely greed?

When we begin to examine this issue, we find that most of those doing this research are truly convinced that the approach they are taught is the proper methodology. They are convinced, in their own minds, that it is for the good of humankind.

If we think for a moment about the knowledge available to any given scholar or scientist in the many fields of study, and compare that to what the average citizen may know about any of this, we come to the idea that there are many things known by these scholars to which most people are oblivious. When we think about the meetings that may take place between leaders of nations or diplomats; or operations that may be undertaken by any intelligence organization, we are again confronted with the ignorance of the majority of people. We may read books by people claiming to be in the know, and we may hear stories and watch movies, and come to some idea of the many areas of our world in which we can only participate vicariously, fictitiously, or not at all; but can only suspect. And even at those rarefied levels, we find that each and every one of them, with few exceptions, believe that what they are doing – even if it entails secrecy – is for the good of humanity.

And, of course, each and every different group has its own idea of what is good for humanity, and some of these opinions are diametrically opposed to one another. When we step back from the picture, we see that something crucial is being missed. And this crucial thing seems to be the ability to observe the world objectively – empirically, if you will – and to use the mind to assess the fruits of the ideas in an objective manner.

I once was told that in China, (and I can’t verify that this is true), at a certain time in its history, doctors were required to post above their doorways a list of all their patients who had died. Not only that, the custom was that the patient did not pay the doctor until he was cured. This had the effect of motivating doctors to figure out what really worked in terms of healing therapies.

In Western medicine, it seems that this motivation to find a real cure or solution, on an individual basis, is lacking. Not only that, but this motivation factor is missing from all other areas of our lives.

For but one example: our governments are composed of individuals who seek office not to serve the people ­– even if they give lip service to that idea – but for money and power. If the payoff of money and power were removed from the sphere of government, if our elected officials were required to post the number of patients who had died above their doors, and were only paid if they were successful in solving the problems of the public sector, you can be sure that there would be a mad rush by many to get out of government, and the field would be left to those who were really capable of solving our problems.

In 1974, my grandfather died because he was killed by the medical profession. His diagnosed problem was high blood pressure. He was treated by administering the standard medications indicated by the medical profession at the time, and died when his potassium levels plunged and his heart stopped. Ten years later, I watched an expose on a news magazine TV show. The show exposed the fact that this standard treatment had killed so many people and doctors were finally questioning the selection of drugs they were using to treat high blood pressure. It was a scandal of national proportions. And it wasn’t the first one.

I grew up next door to a child who was a Thalidomide baby. We were best friends for many years, until I moved away. Sammy had no arms and one leg was a vestigial flipper. The other leg was normal. Sammy was a genius with a delightful personality and an assertive, no-nonsense, ambitious nature. There was no question that he was in charge of our relationship and I spent a lot of time executing his wishes: building things, setting things up, fetching, carrying, and just generally being his arms and legs. I’ll never forget the year he decided that Christmas trees ought to have a use after Christmas, and we were going to create a “magic forest.” It was my job to go up and down the streets of our neighborhood and retrieve all the trees set out for the trash collectors. I had to drag them back – many of them bigger than I was – and set them up according to Sammy’s specifications. In the end, we had about 50 of them.

I never thought much about the fact that Sammy was different when we were growing up. I was four and he was two when we were first plopped into a sandbox together, and all of his development took place before my eyes and seemed natural. He could do just about everything with his feet that I could do with my hands, including using scissors and playing the organ. When he came over to my house to play, and we had a snack, a special stool was available for him to sit on at the table that was the same height as the table so he could use his feet to eat. Once he was situated, my grandmother would wash his feet for him. When I would go out with him and his family on a trip to a store or a movie, I was aware that other people stared and moved away from him, and so I knew that he was different, but I never gave much thought until I grew up. It was then that I learned that Sammy was the way he was because a doctor gave his mother some pills for morning sickness.

I never, ever forgot that a doctor ­– acting in good faith – had done this.

Now, if our own third-density world has so many layers and compartments and secrets and agendas, do we think that it is possible that the same could be true for the fourth-density STS reality?

As above, so below.

In the present time, there are all sorts of communications with higher beings and sources of all kinds taking place. When we look at this, we find that there is the same problem apparent as we find in our own world. Can it be that there are fourth-density beings – or higher – who communicate with humans by various means, who are simply as ignorant of the doings in their realities as we are in our own? Or, that their agendas – even if framed to seem for the good of humanity – could be less than positive?

And if our own scientists will experiment on our little second-density companions in ways that you will soon discover, do we for one minute think that scientists at fourth density would not feel justified doing the same with us?

I don’t know about you, but the very thought of it produces in me a sensation that I prefer not to extend for any period of time, and my mind hastily closes the door on such a thought. But, at the same time, I understand clearly that I must be knowledgeable about these things, just as I must educate myself about health care in order to prevent myself or those close to me from being used as guinea pigs by the medical profession.

Yet, it is a thought that we must consider. And consider well.

Not only do we have to consider people we come into direct contact with who, even with the best of intentions, can destroy our lives through ignorance, we also have to consider those who are exploiting this. In our own recent times there was such activity, rooted in the idea that it was “for the good of mankind.” And those who closed their eyes to it became victims in spirit if not in fact. I am reminded of an account by Elie Wiesel where he tells how his father refused to believe that the Nazis would ever do anything uncivilized, and constantly put off taking his family to safety. Of course, it was too late. He was warned, he was urged, he was entreated – but he steadfastly refused to believe any evil of anyone.

In the present time, we have many who are taking this stand; believing that love is the answer and the open heart is the way. Over and over again in history we see this approach leading to massacre and bloodbath. Darkness falls upon the land and it’s a long time before balance is reestablished.

Such individuals claim that their knowledge comes from higher sources and that they are sure it is truth because it feels good. They are sure that love can only beget love, and if they have an open heart that is full of love, that nothing that is not of that frequency can ever pass such a barrier.

The problem here is much the same as the problems we find within our own world. As the Cassiopaeans noted, “When you assume that capture and imprisonment of those of lesser capacity than you is for ‘the good,’ why should not you expect those of greater capacity than you to assume the same regarding you?!”

We learn from Michael Topper, in simplified form here:

We well know the law of 3rd density: No two objects can occupy the same space at the same time. It should be obvious that this is a function of perception. … Perception determines the outline of what’s to stand as an object. In 3rd density, objects are mutually exclusive and define one another by contrast – by their differences. … Perception of unity … is a function of higher density cognition. It requires the use of faculties that are presently recessed in our being, and only occasionally accessed.

When, through spiritual practice or discipline performed on this plane, we perceive the luminous wholeness of separate objects, we are experiencing a momentary coordination with energies belonging to other densities and drawn into our frame of reference.

… 3rd density is the level where consciousness awakens to itself by a process of modeled approximations of things out there. That is to say that the internal dialogue of the soul is verbalized by the symbols of the world – the reality in which we live and move and have our being.

… The potential of 3rd density is pure awareness of consciousness itself without the need for descriptions or models out there. This is why the 3rd density level of consciousness is a critical threshold. Its potential clarity about its own existence is what aligns it with higher density consciousness. If it can correctly read the symbols of reality and align itself with them, even though they are a mask, the currents of being become stronger.

Thus we see that this is a very decisive stage in soul-realization. And we understand that the soul development is in the hands of the consciousness unit itself; dependent upon its accuracy in reading the symbols and aligning properly. This is the process of polarization.

The problem is: the soul is conditioned by inbuilt patterns of survival, ritual, reproduction and power-acquisition developed on the basis of lower density influences, i.e. the material world, i.e. the Predator’s mind. These are enforced through the basal-brain lobes of the Reptilian complex and the correlating abdominal centers of the autonomic currents in the mind/body.

What beckons the 3rd density consciousness is the intimations of the higher densities of intelligence and life. These intimations can be received in varying strengths and levels based upon the level of congruence or alignment of the individual with the symbols of their life which are there to inform them of what is really being said at the higher levels of their being.

So, we see that the lessons of 4th density are these simple understandings relating to correctly reading the symbols of our reality and aligning ourselves with them by application of our knowledge and awareness. This involves constant work in adjusting, shifting, and realigning ourselves in experimental feedback maneuvers, which generate an ongoing adventure in God seeking.

… We may understand the business of the densities by analogy with Rubik’s Cube. The minimal threshold level of 3rd density consciousness is like being at the center of the Cube, which represents our self-reflection in the outer world, which is given to us in a maximum state of disorder. This means that everything we perceive is received through distorted patterns of a maze.

We must keep in mind that this distorted pattern of our reality is for purposes of catalyst, or forced choices. Being in a maze generates the necessity of choice. Since Unity is not perceived in this reality, the consciousness unit, or soul, is confronted with the requirement of assessing the implications of all interaction with other beings and situations, and of choosing an orientation on the basis of that personal assessment.

… Given a full complement of rational and intuitive faculties (which self-aware consciousness develops by trial and error in the beginning), the soul may learn to function in alignment with an underlying principle of unity; it sees difference as many aspects of one; and each is valued. This learning is accomplished by either experimental reflection and analysis of consequences, or it may reject the evidence of the objective reality and choose instead to cling to its own version of truth, seeking ever to impose this on the reality, choosing to see that unity can only be by elimination of difference, the arbiter of what is the right way, being, of course, the subjective view of such a consciousness. [As the Cassiopaeans describe it, “wishful thinking.”]

… The work of crystallizing these two extremes of polarization is the real and underlying business of 3rd density. We live our myriad rounds of incarnation through this density, preserved between incarnations as a memory record of these identification patterns coded in the soul matrix, in order to produce this polarization to one side of the self equation or the other.

The inference is, of course, that the balancing mechanism of karma does not merely serve the rectification process of our many spiritual teachings, but actually serve to harmonize the soul in objective understanding of unity of all, or to consolidate a contractile soul that refuses repeatedly to see difference as many aspects of the One, and chooses instead to seek to make all One by eliminating differences.

The level of the soul’s ability to align in one way or the other via will, is the measure of it’s harvestability to 4th density at the end of each master cycle which, according to many sources, is the period in which we live at present.

Harvestability is the ripeness of the soul to proceed by virtue of the intensity with which it holds its view of reality. This means that subjective, one-pointed devotion to Love of Self – manifested as preference of the self’s view of reality over and above whatever the objective reality may actually manifest – is capable of achieving a dedicated integration. It is as though such a soul makes absolutely no attempt to sort and work with the confused faces of Rubik’s Cube; it makes no effort to learn how to work with the symbols, but steadfastly recoils in the center of the cube, believing that the faces of the cube are aligned and that it’s belief makes it an objective fact.

[This is the essence of Love of Self. And such a consciousness backs its choice by godly justifications. It seeks to be saved, i.e. have the cube aligned for it by an outside agency that will come rushing to its aid if it manifests enough love and faith with its open and bleeding heart. And this is where we come back to the remark made above by the Cassiopaeans: “When you assume that capture and imprisonment of those of lesser capacity than you is for ‘the good,’ why should not you expect those of greater capacity than you to assume the same regarding you?!”]

Such a soul, persisting in its love and faith against the clues and hints of the symbol system of reality, is wide open for subsumation into a hierarchy of beings who are firmly convinced that what they are doing is “for the good of humanity.” (“Will, Being and Well Being”)

And it is in this context that such beings have created and disseminated such spiritual and religious beliefs such as “suffering will earn you a place in heaven,” or “turn the other cheek,” or “give until it hurts,” or “your faith will make you whole,” and on and on.

Now, notice that I did not include such things as “love your enemy, bless those that persecute you,” because, in the larger sense, the soul that chooses to serve others, that chooses to see unity in difference will naturally love the enemy and bless persecutors. He will just see them as one face of the cube, part of the whole, and not necessarily the face that he wishes to align with or give energy to.

So, once the orientation is chosen – ipso facto by repeated actions through many incarnations – the soul is then graduated to fourth density where the lessons have to do with love and understanding. It is there that this is distilled and purified according to orientation. At fourth density, the nature of the density is love of the creator in terms of either one’s subjective view, or the objective reality. The general rule of loving God reaches all densities. It is at third density that everything is masked so that the soul must choose based on how it develops – and how it develops is based on how it chooses. As these choices add up, the soul becomes ripe in loving God as Self, or loving others as both God and Self.

At fourth density, the purpose of both polarities is the same: to seek a degree of intensification and alignment with their chosen version of love. The difference is, the STS polarity seeks to absorb or eat love energy. The very atmosphere of fourth density is that of love. And when any third-density being establishes contact with the higher densities by intensification of subjective faith, the natural inflow of energies will be perceived as overwhelming love.

They seek to promote the “open heart and love” approach because this is what feeds them. Their own choice of Love of Self and imposition of this subjective view is a form of projection that requires massive amounts of energy to maintain.

This idea will be disturbing to those individuals who believe that their challenges to spiritual or higher-density beings, or their open hearts are a kind of talisman or a universal sign of the cross that will automatically repel negativity and send it fleeing. But if the evidence shows that higher-density beings are not so constrained. The STS beings of fourth density rely on this to confuse the issue, to fool the bedeviled mind into taking psychological refuge in such a premise that will actually serve to further encourage the acceptance of the idea that they have the “good of humanity” at heart. What is felt in the presence of any fourth-density being, whether it is Serving Self or Others, is the informing quality of the density through which they function. This love and feeling of unity is the pervasive property of that density, not the personal expression of the beings.

We then come to the problem of why otherwise STO [Service To Others] sources will say that nothing negative can graduate to the higher levels of being and development. Are they lying?

This conforms to a certain belief pattern prevalent in New Age circles. It is also used and supplemented by many channeled sources which take the “see no evil” approach. This doctrine posits that where there is no knowledge of negativity, negativity does not exist. This in turn links to the corollary that “you create your own reality” by what you admit to exist.

We quickly see that this takes us back to the recoiled soul in the middle of the Rubik’s Cube of awareness, willfully refusing to see the jumble of patterns, and demanding that the universe, or God, or whoever, come and fix the blasted thing according to his belief that it ought to be all nicely arranged so that all the colors are together on each side. Never mind that the universe or God doesn’t actually do this, the soul deliberately works to grow his belief so strong that he will see it as fixed, and by doing this will have crystallized his will to the point of being harvested to fourth-density STS.

As mentioned above, it is unlikely that any of us would ever be fooled again by another Hitler. But, curiously, we are blind to such things in spiritual terms. When it comes to negativity of a spiritual nature, or what we might call evil, many people assume that things of the spirit and principles of the material world have different roots and are, therefore, not comparable as we have been told in the Hermetic maxim, As above, so below.

The idea that higher-density beings can be as compartmentalized and varied in their perspectives and objectives ­– only to a degree of greater intensity and ability – is positively not part of the perspective of many people who simply refuse to admit such a possibility.

The very idea of this makes many people experience such a hollow and heavy sensation in the pit of their stomach that they’re sure their gut feelings are showing it to be a lie. It’s bad enough to be transparent to the eyes of a benevolent being at higher levels; it is quite another kettle of fish to have to confront the idea of an incredibly concentrated malevolent intelligence possessing a predatory wisdom that is more than a match for any third-density mentality. And worse yet, such beings can move through our reality, unseen and unfelt, to whisper hemlock sweet words into our defenseless ears while at the same time manipulating with subliminal ease our complex chemistry and thinking, so that they can effectively breach the barriers of our crude subjective focus without so much as registering a blink in our warning systems. (Cf. Topper)

So unacceptable is this prospect to the third-density ego, ruled by anxiety, that it panics and pushes the veto button, foaming at the mouth in denial, reaching in frenzy for every holy word of whatever denomination was inculcated in childhood that clearly states “only the good” pass on to the higher worlds.

When faced with such an idea, even if we have given up Churchianity, we will flee to the sources that tell us negative values and thoughts of warfare can’t be brought along to the higher realms. Such sources would have us believe that the common denominator of higher levels compels conscious conformance to the value of unity.

For some, the very fact that a higher being would even speak about anything negative in any context, is proof that they are a negative being or a Satanically deluded lower astral spirit. Because, of course, all higher beings are so purified that such words cannot pass their ephemeral lips without choking them. Yeah, right!

Such a doctrine has no idea of what to do with an evil that isn’t simply relative to cultural context or evil by comparative definition, or is evil due to ignorance, but is, on the contrary, very conscious, very intentional, very malevolent and cunning to a level that cannot be plumbed by third-density awareness.

Does that scare you? It ought to. But not so that you will run and hide or live in terror, or dive into denial. It ought to galvanize you to do what is appropriate to the situation: learn all you can so that you are better equipped to utilize reason and analysis and observation in order to make your choices more congruent with your internal alignment.

Does it scare you to think that the medical system in the Western world may be approaching healing in the wrong way; that your doctor, despite his best intentions, may have been educated and brainwashed into a system that does not promote health? If you are ill and need treatment, and you know that your doctor might kill you or do irreparable harm to you, do you just go into denial about your sickness and sit there and die? Or do you begin to learn all you can about your illness, the many varied treatment methods that might be available in other forms of healing, and possibly take responsibility for your own wellness by making some decisions as to what treatments you will implement in your own life? And, if you are stymied or blocked in this endeavor, will you just give up and take the only medicine available and possibly die?

Now, in our works, we have never asked anybody to believe anything. We simply have the idea that human beings worldwide have a right to know what may be going on, and a possible interpretation of things that have puzzled human beings for a very long time.

We also wish to observe that the greatest minds of history have sought to work through and explain these issues for millennia with little success. And, for the most part, they have taken the route of “faith in the goodness of higher beings who will take care of us if we pray and are long-suffering.” While we think that such efforts are laudable, we also think that they are bound by their own self-defined limitations and that they are thereby prevented from disseminating information that can make a real difference. Their track records speak for themselves if the individual will take the time to stop listening to the propaganda and look at the “fruits.”

When we began to share this information, very few people took it seriously. Now it seems that many others are jumping on the bandwagon and approaching it with the idea of generating fear for its own sake. That has never been the objective of the Cassiopaeans. They say knowledge protects. And it is in this present work that it will become clear, in the most exact terms, how this is true to a level hardly imagined by the reader up to this point.

Here at Cassiopaea we have accumulated information that suggests the human population on this planet has been subjected for many thousands of years to intense manipulation by “alien” forces through human agents, if not directly. The Cassiopaeans do not take the view that these aliens are of the third-density type; i.e. that they are necessarily travelers from different star systems who are more or less as physical as we are and with whom we can engage on any kind of equal footing in our terms. However, they have been teaching us that we can generate our own protection in higher-level terms, and that this protection is a kind of awareness that is generated as knowledge and is applied. How and why this works is going to become evident to the reader as we examine the inner workings and hidden mechanisms of the Matrix Control System.

The ancient Sumerians claimed that the human race was created to be a slave race, a food source, and a genetic pool for higher beings, the Annunaki. The Cassiopaeans confirm that we were altered for this purpose, having been created or embodied for altogether different reasons that did not include being food.

October 7, 1994

Q: (L) The Sumerian story of the creation of human beings involves a story where they say they killed a god and mixed his blood and parts to mix with mud and then planted it in these female gestation goddesses and that this is where the human race came from. Now, this sounds an awful lot like what the Grays are doing at the present time. Did someone actually kill a God, break his soul in pieces, and thereby make the human race?
A: Symbolism and not correct event sequence. Lizard beings genetically altering the human race after battle for their own feeding purposes.
Q: (L) When did these events that these Sumerian stories are talking about take place?
A: 309000 years ago, approx.
Q: (L) So, it happened so long ago that these stories have lost the truth?
A: Reflection passed down through psychic memory channel.

However, the Cassiopaeans have made it clear that this is not total control:

October 22, 1994

Q: (L) At one point in a previous transmission it was stated that the Lizard beings altered the human race after a battle for their own feeding purposes. Could you clarify this?
A: It would not be possible for these beings to completely control your existence. If it were, you would not be able to do the things your race has done. There has been interference by the Lizard beings in the physical structure of the human beings for their own benefit. Remember what we told you before. They have been interfering with the time cycle experienced on this plane, for quite some time as you measure it. For 74 thousand years they have been interfering in a backwards and forwards time reference manner in order to set up circumstances that they perceive to be beneficial for them in the measure of time that you would consider to be forward, that is, in the future. They have been going backwards and forwards in time to do this. They are suspended in the time cycle as they do this. So what they perceive as being your equivalent of one hour could be as long as 74 thousand years.
Q: (L) So they haven’t been here for 300 thousand years?
A: They originally set up circumstances for their benefit 309 thousand years ago, however, they have been using the particular bracketed period of the 74 thousand year period alter things in all the various ways mentioned earlier.

The idea of a battle having been fought over the human race is a very ancient idea expressed in many religious parables:

Q: (L) What was the true event behind the story of the mark of Cain?
A: Advent of jealousy.
Q: (L) What occurred to allow jealousy to enter into human interaction?
A: Lizard takeover.
Q: (L) Wasn’t the Lizard takeover an event that occurred at the time of the fall of Eden?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was this story of Cain and Abel part of that takeover?
A: Symbolism of story.
Q: (L) This was symbolic of the Lizzie takeover, the advent of jealousy, and the attitude of brother against brother, is that correct?
A: Partly. The mark of Cain means the “jealousy factor” of change facilitated by Lizard takeover of Earth’s vibrational frequency. Knot on spine is physical residue of DNA restriction deliberately added by Lizards. See?
Q: (L) Okay, Jan is going to move her hand up my back and you tell her when to stop at the knot.
A: Okay.
Q: (L) You mean the [area of the] occipital ridge?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What was the configuration of the spine and skull prior to this addition?
A: Spine had no ridge there. Jealousy emanates from there, you can even feel it.
Q: (L) Do any of these emotions that we have talked about that were generated by DNA breakdown, were any of these related to what Carl Sagan discusses when he talks about the Reptilian brain?
A: In a roundabout way.
Q: (L) Okay, at the time this mark of Cain came about, were there other humans on the planet that did not have this configuration?
A: It was added to all simultaneously.
Q: (L) How did they physically go about performing this act? What was the mechanism of this event, the nuts and bolts of it?
A: Are you ready? DNA core is as yet undiscovered enzyme relating to carbon. Light waves were used to cancel the first ten factors of DNA by burning them off. At that point, a number of physical changes took place including knot at top of spine. Each of these is equally reflected in the ethereal.
Q: (L) Well, the question I do have is, how many people were there on the planet and did they have to take each one and do this individually? … There were [however] many people on the planet, how did they effect this change on all of them?
A: Light wave alteration.
Q: (L) And light waves, actual light waves, affect DNA?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) What was the origin of the light waves?
A: Our center. … Our realm. STO.
Q: (L) So, how did the Lizzies use the light from the Service to Others realm …
A: They used sophisticated technology to interrupt light frequency waves.
Q: (L) Well, what I am getting out of this that you are saying from what you are not saying is that it was almost like, well, was there a battle and you guys lost?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: (T) Now, another force in what we term as the past, defeated you and used the power of the light in order to alter us in different ways, is this correct?
A: Yes. Now understand this: It is all part of natural grand cycle.
Q: (L) If this is all a part of a natural grand cycle, and correct me if I am wrong here, it almost seems as if you guys, the good guys, and the other bad guys, that you just really kind of go at it just for fun, is that true?
A: No.
Q: (L) But you say it is a natural thing or part of a natural grand cycle. Is this natural grand cycle just part of the interaction between light and darkness which just simply must be?
A: Yes. We are at “front line” of universe’s natural system of balance. That is where one rises to before reaching total union of “The One”. 6th level.
[…]
Q : (T) Now, the battle you had with the other side …
A: Are having.
Q: (T) This battle goes on … do you have the light power back?
A: [We] Never lost it, you did.
Q: (T) Okay, I guess that for us the Lizzies are the main force even though they have others on their side …
A: Yes.
Q: (T) They took our light, not yours?
A: Not against you. Currently in union with you.
Q: (T) So we are but one battle in the universe in an overall, ongoing struggle?
A: Yes. Balance is natural. Remember, it’s all just lessons in the grand cycle.
Q: (L) I am really curious … when you guys and the Lizzies go to it, what do you do? I mean, you obviously don’t shoot guns at each other and you don’t have tanks …
A: Too complicated for you to possibly understand because you are not at 4th level yet.
Q: (J) When you are fighting, is it any way at all possible for us to detect the battle?
A: First: We don’t “fight.” Second, yes; it’s nature as in meteorology and earth changes.
Q: (T) Your form of confrontation takes the form of physical changes in the atmosphere and environment of the planet?
A: And in space.
Q: (T) But that is how we detect it? The more activity, the more conflict is going on?
A: Remember, we are the light. They are the dark. We are both high level thought forms reflected at all levels of reality.
Q: (T) So, what we perceive, then, is what comes through to third density, which is not what we would perceive if we were looking at it from fourth or fifth or sixth.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Isn’t it a little unfair for you guys, at sixth level, to take on the Lizzies at only fourth level?
A: The “Lizzies” are the 4th level representatives of the forces of the darkness not the 6th level, and you are 3rd level representatives.
Q: (L) Is there a sixth-level representative of the forces of darkness?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And what is this sixth-level representative known as, or called, or look like or whatever?
A: Orion in your “neighborhood.”
Q: (L) The Orions are sixth-level STS beings?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Are they like you, thought forms?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Do they ever appear in physical matter?
A: Can.
Q: (L) And they are the driving force that controls the Lizzies?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Is there some intermediary between the sixth level Orions and the fourth-level Lizzies, such as a fifth-level force or being?
A: 5th level is contemplation zone for both “sides”.
Q: (L) Does that mean that at the contemplation level that there is no activity? (J) Is it like a “time out?”
A: Close. Balancer.
Q: (L) Is there a third-level representative of the forces of the light?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Who or what are they?
A: Don’t exist on your planet.
Q: (L) Do they have a planet of their own?
A: Have quadrillions of them.
Q: (L) Well, this is beginning to sound like we are in pretty bad shape here. This is like the Siberia of the universe as Gurdjieff said.
A: The Universe is infinitely huge.
Q: (L) If there are planets with STO beings …
A: Some look like you.

So we see that thinking about the takeover and manipulation of humanity in third-density terms of a battle is not quite the issue in the cosmic terms of warfare. And it is in these terms that we need to begin to think. It is in fourth-density terms that we will come to understand how truly knowledge protects.

March 11, 1995

Q: (L) At one point we were told that time was an illusion that came into being at the time of the fall in Eden, and this was said in such a way that I inferred that there were other illusions put into place at that time …
A: Time is an illusion that works for you because of your altered DNA state.
Q: (L) Okay, what other illusions?
A: Monotheism, the belief in one separate, all powerful entity.
Q: (T) Is “separate” the key word in regard to monotheism?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is another one of the illusions?
A: The need for physical aggrandizement.
Q: (L) What is another of the illusions?
A: Linear focus.
Q: (L) Anything else at this time?
A: Unidimensionality.
Q: (L) The veil … (J) The perception of only one dimension … (L) Were these illusions programmed into us genetically through our DNA?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Can you tell us a little bit about how these illusions are enforced on us, how they are perceived by us?
A: If someone opens a door, and behind it you see a pot of gold, do you worry whether there is a poisonous snake behind the door hidden from view, before you reach for the pot of gold?
Q: (L) What does the gold represent?
A: Temptation to limitation.
[…]
Q: (L) So what you are saying to us is that the story of the temptation in Eden was the story of humankind being led into this reality as a result of being tempted. So, the eating of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was …
A: Giving into temptation.
Q: (L) And this was a trick …
A: No! Tricks don’t exist!
Q: (T) Okay, no trick, a trap?
A: No! Traps don’t exist either. Free will could not be abridged if you had not obliged.
Q: (T) What were we before the “fall?”
A: 3rd density STO.
Q: (T) We are STS at this point because of what happened then?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: (T) We were third-density STO at that time. Was this after the battle that had transpired? In other words, were we, as a third-density race, literally on our own at that point, as opposed to before?
A: Was battle.
Q: (L) The battle was in us?
A: Through you.
Q: (T) The battle was through us as to whether we would walk through this doorway … (L) The battle was fought through us, we were literally the battleground. (T) Was the battle over whether or not we walked through that door?
A: Close.
Q: (T) Okay, we were STO at that point. You have said before that on this density we have the choice of being STS or STO.
A: Oh Terry, the battle is always there, it’s “when” you choose that counts!
[…]
Q: (T) This must tie into why the Lizards and other aliens keep telling people that they have given their consent for abduction and so forth. We were STO and now we are STS.
A: Yes, … “when” you went for the gold, you said “hello” to the Lizards and all that that implies.
Q: (T) … By going for the gold, we became STS beings because going for the gold was STS.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And, in doing so, we ended up aligning ourselves with the fourth-density Lizard Beings …
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Because they are fourth-density beings and they have a lot more abilities than we at third density …
A: You used to be aligned with 4th density STO.
Q: (T) And we were third-density STO. But, by going for the gold we aligned ourselves with fourth-density STS.
A: Yes.
Q: (T) And by doing so we gave fourth-density STS permission to do whatever they wish with us?
A: Close.
Q: (T) So, when they tell us that we gave them permission to abduct us, it is this they are referring to?
A: Close.
Q: (J) Go back to what they said before: “Free will could not be abridged if you had not obliged.”

(T) We, as the human race, used our free will to switch from STO to STS.

(L) So, at some level we have chosen the mess we are in and that is the super ancient legend of the fallen angel, Lucifer. That is us. We fell by falling into that door, so to speak, going after the pot of gold, and when we fell through the door, the serpent bit us!
A: But this is a repeating syndrome.
Q: (L) Is it a repeating syndrome just for the human race or is it a repeating syndrome throughout all of creation?
A: It is the latter.
Q: (L) Is this a repeating syndrome throughout all of creation simply because it is the cyclic nature of things? Or is it as the Indians call it, Maya?
A: Either or.

So, we find that there is a huge element of free will involved in making the choice to “fall.” The only problem is, the consequences of this choice were not understood due to a lack of knowledge. Another thing that is generally misunderstood is the possibilities of living in a state of third-density STO. It is clearly not the same as living in third-density STS in a lot of ways! The problem seems to have been that the effects of the material universe – entering into a third-density physical body for purposes of learning and more rapid development ­– is the pot of gold that humanity reached for.

October 22, 1994

Q: (L) Can a spiritual being become entrapped in physical matter?
A: It’s possible but very unlikely.
Q: (L) Are human beings entrapped in physical matter?
A: By choice.
Q: (L) Why did they make this choice?
A: To experience physical sensations. It was a group mind decision.
Q: (L) Who was in charge of the group?
A: The group. […] Everything that exists in all realms of the universe can experience existence in one of only two ways. That would be defined as a long wave cycle and a short wave cycle. Going back to your previous question about why humans are “entrapped” in physical existence, which, of course, is voluntary and chosen, this was due to the desire to change from the long wave cycle experience of completely – what you would call – ethereal or spiritual existence, to the short wave cycle of what you call physical existence. The difference is that a long wave cycle involves only very gradual change in evolution in a cyclical manner. Whereas a short wave cycle involves a duality. And this is the case with souls in physical bodies as is experienced on this earth plane because the soul experiences an ethereal state for half the cycle and a physical state for the other half of the cycle. While these halves are not measured in time the way you measure time, the totality of experience is equal in each half. The necessity to form the short wave cycle was brought about through nature through the natural bounds of the universe when the group mind of souls chose to experience physicality as opposed to a completely ethereal existence.

The key term in the above remarks is “desire.” The group desired to change to a cycle that includes physical existence. Now, the question becomes: why would this be seen as desirable? The Cassiopaeans have said that this was because the physical life experience of duality was seen to provide:

An increase in relative energy which speeds up the learning process of the soul and all of its one dimensional and two dimensional interactive partners. In other words, flora and fauna, minerals, etc. All experience growth and movement towards reunion at a faster rate on the cycle through this short wave cycle physical/ethereal transfer.

So, we see that this desire for the gold was also a desire to change the rate of movement towards reunion with the One. Of course, it was thought that this could be done in a safe and moderated manner. The dangers of physical existence were not fully appreciated:

October 23, 1994

Q: (L) Did, at any time, the human race live for a long time in an Edenic state, where they were able to use bodies and still have a spiritual connection?
A: Yes. But not long. No addiction takes long to close the circle.
Q: (L) So, mankind was addicted to pleasuring the self?
A: Became quickly.

But that this was a progression over aeons is made clear in the following:

June 24, 2000

Q: (L) A reader writes: “I can’t reconcile the idea of our being trapped or lured – by sensuality – into a physical state with the idea that we have progressed through the vegetative and animal states.” This is a good question. It seems that the energy of creation has progressed through the vegetative and animal states, that animals can graduate to third density and become human, just as humans can graduate to fourth density. How do we reconcile this with the idea that human souls were entrapped into third-density bodies from fourth density, by the Lizards? Are we talking about two different functions? Two different groups?
A: Humans were not entrapped by the “Lizards.”
Q: (B) We volunteered!

(L) Well, they did say that the Lizards were waiting for the right soul matrix to “step in.” So, we were the right soul matrix and we stepped into these engineered bodies that the Lizards created. That’s what you said. So, how do we reconcile us stepping into these engineered third-density bodies with soul evolution through the vegetative and animal states?
A: If you look more closely at the material, it was not stated that the consciousness levels currently represented by humans and many others “stepped into” anything in particular but PHYSICALITY. Individual consciousness units stepped into different physical forms. Some “stepped” in as humans right off the bat, and some chose otherwise. It is simply that the “choice” to experience physicality in many forms, was simultaneous, though different “units” have participated in different ways at different stages, rather than in a linear progression.

This same idea has been expressed by the Cassiopaeans in terms of the Big Bang as being this emergence of consciousness into physicality rather than the beginning of the physical universe in Darwinian terms.

October 18, 1994

Q: (L) Is there only one ultimate creator of the universe?
A: All is one. And one is all.
Q: (L) From the one what was the first division?
A: Mass division and disbursement.
Q: (L) Was this simultaneous?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Was this what we refer to as the Big Bang?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Is there any reference to this event in terms of time?
A: Always.
Q: (L) Can we say that all that exists in the material universe is, say, “x” number of years old?
A: No. It is the eternal now. Not only did happen, is happening and going to happen. The expanded presence.

We can also think of this process of stepping into matter in terms of the story of the Prodigal Son. In this story, the young man took his inheritance and went to a distant country where he wasted his fortune in reckless and loose living. And, it just so happened that at the same time that he ran out of money, a terrible famine came upon the land and he was unable to make his way by working. He then attached himself to a citizen of that country who set him to work tending the pigs, and he ended up eating with the pigs. Then, he came to himself and realized that even his father’s servants were better off than he, and he decided to go home and beg his father’s forgiveness and offer to be a servant.

So, he went home. But, while he was a far way off, his father saw him and ran to meet him, and embraced him with pity and tenderness, made the feast, and so forth. You know the story: the fatted calf and all that.

Well, what we are learning here is that the human race is a fragmented soul unit and this story is about us. We are the Prodigal Son, we are Lucifer, the fallen angel, we are Toto and Dorothy carried to Oz by the tornado because we desired to speed things up. And, the image of the son wasting all his wealth is the description of the fragmenting of the being of which each of us is a part.

But Oz, the distant country, the realms of physical reality – they exist as part of the cyclical nature of the Cosmos and is represented in the many ancient depictions of God as a two-faced being. The word matter is related to mother, and the physical universe is the great womb of the cosmos, or Prime Creator. Into which the sperm or creative consciousness of the Prime Creator is disbursed, and from which can be born the sons of God. Matter is not evil, though from our perspective we may view our experiences here as evil.

These ideas are not new; in the past, many have suggested them in one form or another. The outline of these stories is that during the times before humankind on Earth, there was much experimentation with forms that could be used for the development of consciousness. As this activity proceeded, many souls became fascinated by their own thought creations. They wished to better understand the three dimensions they had manifested and there was a rush to inhabit these physical expressions.

Many souls entered into plants and animals for the sheer joy of experience. As they did so, they found that their force was drawn within and concentrated in the periphery of the inhabited body. This created a uniquely intense experience so that it was sought and repeated over and over again. As this was repeated, it caused a reaction in the spiritual energies of the souls that crystallized in three dimensions. This crystallization became a sort of veil between consciousness and soul energy. As these souls forgot their source, they created energy imbalances by acting in ways that completely disregarded the free will and choice of others.

This was Earth prior to modern man. And here is where the story gets interesting. The result of the imbalance created by separation of consciousness and soul energy was the cycle of reincarnation. It is revealed by certain esoteric sources that a group of beings not engaged in this activity of physical existence sought to create a means to heighten the energies and perceptions of those who were entrapped in this cycle.¹ A physical form was directly manifested to accommodate this purpose, and this physical form was modern man. And here, of course, is where it gets tricky as well due to all the inversions and distortion of the events by those with less than our best interests at heart. Apparently, this directly manifested creation is the one that was taken over and altered. This resulted in the legends of the Fall.

October 23, 1994

Q: (L) Well, then how did mankind come to be here?
A: Combination of factors. Numerous souls desired physical existence then was altered by three forces including principally Lizards through Grays, Nephalim and Orion union.
[…]
Q: (L) You said numerous souls desired physical existence. When the numerous souls did this, how did physical existence come to be?
A: First was apelike.
Q: (L) And then what happened? Did these apelike beings just pop into the air? What did the souls do with these apelike beings?
A: Souls altered them by transfer.
Q: (L) Transfer of what?
A: Souls into seeded bodies. Orion Union was first [to put souls] into Neanderthal. … Put humans there for incubation process.
Q: (L) Were altered ape embryos put back into ape females for gestation?
A: No. Souls only.
Q: (L) They put the souls into the ape bodies?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Did the soul’s presence in the ape body cause its genetics and DNA to change?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) They entered into living creatures on this planet to experience 3D reality and by entering in caused mutation?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: (L) Where did the souls come from that entered into the bodies on the planet Earth? Were they in bodies on other planets before they came here?
A: Not this group.
Q: (L) Were they just floating around in the universe somewhere?
A: In union with the One. Have you heard the super ancient legend of Lucifer, the fallen angel?
Q: (L) Who is Lucifer?
A: You. The human race.
Q: (L) Are the souls of individual humans the parts of a larger soul?
A: Yes. Close. The One. All who have fallen must learn “the hard way.”
Q: (L) Are you saying that the act of wanting to experience physical reality is the act of falling?
A: You are members of a fragmented soul unit.
Q: (L) What is it about wanting to be physical is a fall?
A: Pleasure for the self.

At a later time, we came back to this in more detail:

August 28, 1999

Q: Well, this is one of the problems I am … trying to … understand is, prior to the Fall in Eden, mankind lived in a fourth-density state. Is that correct?
A: Semi/sort of.
Q: Please be more specific.
A: 4th density in another realm, such as time/space continuum, etc.
Q: Okay, so this realm changed, as a part of the cycle, various choices were made: the human race went through the door after the gold, so to speak, and became aligned with the Lizzies … This resulted in a number of effects: the breaking up of the DNA, the burning off of the first ten factors of DNA, the separation of the hemispheres of the brain …
A: Only reason for this: you play in the dirt, you’re gonna get dirty.
Q: What was the motivating factor for playing in the dirt? What essential thing occurred? You said once that it was “desire based imbalance.” What was it a desire for?
A: Increased physicality.
Q: What was the objective sought for in this desire for increased physicality?
A: Sensate.
Q: How was sensate experienced so that these beings had an idea that they could get more if they increased their physicality?
A: Not experienced, demonstrated.
Q: Demonstrated how, by who?
A: Do you not know?
Q: It was demonstrated by the Lizzies?
A: Basically.
Q: Demonstrated in what way? Did they say: “Here, try this!” Or did they demonstrate by showing or doing?
A: Closer to the latter.
Q: They were doing, experimenting, playing, and saying: “Look, we are doing this, it’s so great, come here and try it.”
A: Not really. More like: “You could have this.”
Q: What seemed to be so desirable about this increased physicality when they said “You can have this?”
A: Use your imagination!
Q: Was there any understanding or realization of any kind that increased physicality could be like Osiris lured into his own coffin by Set? That they would then slam the lid shut and nail him in?
A: Obviously, such understanding was lacking.
Q: Sounds like a pretty naive bunch! Does the lack of this understanding reflect a lack of knowledge?
A: Of course. But more, it is desire getting in the way of …
[…]
Q: Okay. The Fall occurred. It seems like, and some of the archaeological studies indicate, that for many thousands of years there was a peaceful existence and a nice agrarian society where the goddess or female creative forces were worshipped. At least, this is what a lot of present-day books are proposing …
A: No. These events took place 309000 years ago, as you measure it. This is when the first prototype of what you call “modern man” was created. The controllers had the bodies ready, they just needed the right soul matrix to agree to “jump in.”
[…]
Q: So, was there any kind of worship of God, or religious activity in this pre-Fall state; this Edenic, semi-fourth-density state?
A: No need when one has a clue.
Q: … Okay, we had these guys, they fell from Eden, but they were still fairly close to the original concepts, in some terms. Once they jumped into the physical bodies, as you put it, what was their level of conceptualization regarding the universe? Did they still retain some understanding at that point?
A: Kind of like the understanding one has after severe head trauma, vis a vis your normal understanding in your current state.
Q: So, they were traumatized; they may have had bits and pieces of ideas and memories, but they may also have lost a great deal altogether. There may have even been a sort of coma state of mankind for many millennia. But, after they woke up, with the bits and pieces floating around in their heads, they may have begun to attempt to piece it all together. So, they started putting it all back together. What was the first thing they put together regarding the cosmos around them?
A: Sex.
Q: What did they decide about sex? I mean, sex was there. They were having sex. Is that it? Or, did they understand the cosmos as sex?
A: More like the former. After all, that is what got you guys in this mess in the first place! Just imagine the sales job if you can: “Look how much fun this is! Want to try it?!? Oops, sorry, we forgot to tell you, you cannot go back!”
Q: I really fail to understand – and I know it is a big issue that has been hinted at and alluded to, and outright claims have been made regarding sex in all religions and mythologies – but I fail to understand the mechanics of how this can be the engineering of a fall. What precisely are the mechanics of it? What energy is generated? How is it generated? What is the conceptualization of the misuse of this energy, or the use of the energy?
A: It is simply the introduction of the concept of self-gratification of a physical sort.
Q: On many occasions you have said that the ideal thing is to have perfect balance of physicality and ethereality. This has been said on a number of occasions. Now, I don’t understand how it can be that gratification of a physical body can be the mechanics by which one is entrapped? Is it not gratifying to look at something beautiful? Is it wrong, sinful, or a form of a fall, to look at beauty, to hear something beautiful such as music, or to touch something that is sensually delightful such as a piece of silk or the skin of a loved one? These various things that the human being derives pleasure from very often elevate them to a spiritual state.
A: Possession is the key. In STS, you possess. … If you move through the beautiful flowers, the silk, the skin of another, but do not seek to possess …
Q: It seems to me that it is possible to experience all of these things, including sex, without the need or desire to possess; only to give. In which case, I still don’t understand how it can be a mechanism for a fall.
A: If it is desired, then the mechanism is not to give. Do you eat a piece of chocolate cake because it is good to give to the stomach?
Q: Well, you could!
A: No, in STS, which is your realm do not forget, one gives because of the pleasant sensation which results.
Q: Could it not be said that, if everything that exists is part of God, including the flesh, that if one gives to the flesh, without being attached to the giving, that it could be considered a giving to the all?
A: Explain the process.
Q: For example: there are some people who like to suffer, because they believe that the flesh is sinful. That is a big thing that the Lizzies have instituted. For centuries they have wanted people to suffer, and they have made this big deal about sex and anything that might be considered pleasant or desirable should be denied, and that a person should suffer, and revel in their suffering. And, actually, making a person …
A: If one seeks to suffer, they do so in expectation of future reward. They desire to possess something in the end.
Q: What I am saying is: if a person can simply be, in the doing and being of who and what they are, in simplicity; to become involved in doing everything as a meditation, or as a consecration, whether they are walking down the street and being at one with the air, the sunshine, the birds and trees and other people; in this state of oneness, doesn’t that constitute a giving to the universe as giving oneself up as a channel for the universe to experience all these things?
A: Not if one is “feeling this oneness.”
Q: We are what we are. Nature is nature. Progression is progression. And if people would just relax and be who and what they are in honesty, and do what is according to their nature without violating the free will of others, that this is a more pure form of being than doing things out of any feeling of expectation, or desire. To just be, not want … just be?
A: Yes, but STS does not do that.
Q: (A) From which I draw conclusions: if there’s STS around us, we cannot just …
A: You are all STS. If you were not, you would not be where you are.
Q: (A) There are those who are happy in the STS mode; and there are those who are trying to get out of the STS mode …
A: STO candidate.
Q: (A) These STO candidates cannot just simply be, even theoretically, because then, STS would eat them.
A: No.
Q: Why not?
A: STS does not eat according to protocol. … STS “eats” whatever it wants to, if it is able.
Q: That’s what we said. If you are STO in an STS world, you are basically defenseless and they eat you.
A: No.
Q: Why? What makes STO unavailable or inedible?
A: Frequency resonance not in sync.
Q: (A) But then, that would mean that all these people who are saying that we need just to love everything and everybody, are right. They just be, and love, don’t do anything, just give everything to the Lizzies … they are right!
A: No, because motivation is STS.
Q: How is the motivation to love everything and everybody, and to just give, STS?
A: Feels good.
Q: So, they want to do it because it feels good?
A: Want is an STS concept.
Q: So, you seem to be suggesting that the real trick is to just become non-attached to anything and anybody, do nothing, and just dissolve into nothing? No thought, no want, no do, no be, no anything!
A: If you are STS, that does not fit, but, if you did exactly that, you would reincarnate in an STO realm, where such energy does fit.
Q: But, if you have become nothing, how do you reincarnate? And, when you say reincarnate, that implies being in a body!
A: You do not become nothingness.
Q: But, being incarnated means being in a body?
A: No.
Q: You mean moving into a realm that does not necessarily mean being in a body?
A: Close. But 4th density STO is partially physical. Does not consume nor possess.
[…]
Q: So, prior to this time, this prior Edenic state …
A: Was more like 4th density.
Q: But that implies that there was some level of physicality. Was there physicality in the sense of bodies that look like present-day humans?
A: Not quite.
Q: What did these pre-fall …
A: Cannot answer because it is too complex for you to understand.
Q: Does this mean that the bodies we possibly would move into, or morph into, as fourth-density beings, assuming that one does, would also be too complex for us to understand? You are saying that this sort of fourth-density pre-Fall state, in terms of the physical bodies, is too complex to understand. If going back to fourth density is anything like coming from fourth density, does that mean that what we would go back to is something that is too complex to understand? This variability of physicality that you have described?
A: Yes.

Now, I hope that you noted all the references to “feeling” that were put in italics. These are all clues that I am setting in the background for the reader to keep in mind as we move along. But, there is one more thing I want to bring in before we get down to business.

We note that the Cassiopaeans have said the first prototype of modern man was created or engineered 309,000 years ago by genetic mixing with Neanderthal types. The right soul matrix was found, jumped into, thereby altering the DNA with its presence. The reader may enjoy having a look at The Neanderthal Enigma (by James Shreeve 1995), which investigates the strange mystery of the Neanderthals, of whom suddenly disappeared during the appearance of modern man. What happened to them and why is a very great mystery and the terms of understanding this enigma change almost daily. This event is generally dated, by various dating processes, to have occurred 35,000 years ago. However, in the above referenced work there are mysterious appearances of modern type man in several places and times long before this date that are yet to be explained. As soon as you have finished The Neanderthal Enigma, you might want to then read Shattering the Myths of Darwinism by Richard Milton for a better perspective on the issues, though I am not saying that either of them have the answer.

We need to note that there is a difference between what the Cassiopaeans are talking about in terms of a modern type man on Earth, and their story about the appearance of the survivors of the destruction of the planet Kantek (the so-called Aryan-Nordic types).

It is clear, from what the Cassiopaeans have indicated, that the “out of Africa” hypothesis is correct, as far as it goes. Earth may have been populated from the South, but it was “enlightened” from the North ­– at least in the most recent cycle, of which we are a part.

Everyone agrees that we evolved from more primitive ancestors represented by fossils and traditionally called Homo erectus. The disagreement erupts over where, when, and how. From the critical time period, roughly 400,000 to 100,000 years ago, there is an ambiguous clutter of bones that people have reluctantly agreed to group together and call archaic Homo sapiens, because they don’t know what else to call them. Some scientists also keep a separate bin for the more us-like fossils in the group, producing the exquisite oxymoron “archaic moderns.”

Then Allan Wilson and another Berkely scientist Vincent Sarich got it into their heads to look for clues to the human past not out on the African savanna but among the proteins of living people and primates. … [They claim] that the mutations occur across the millennia at a steady rate, like the ticks of a molecular clock. If this is true, the difference in a given protein in any two species would indicate not only how related they were, but also how much time had elapsed since they shared a common ancestor. …

… The first efforts to create such a genetic history of humanity focused on blood chemistry. Every person alive bears a gene that determines whether his or her blood will be type A, B, O, or AB. Human blood also contains an antigen to destroy invading toxins, which comes in two forms, Rh-positive and Rh-negative. …

… American Indians are virtually all type O. Rh negative blood is found almost exclusively among Europeans and is most prevalent in the Basque people of the Western Pyrenees. Since blood groups are determined by specific, known genes and do not seem to be related much to environmental pressures, they are far more useful in judging the relationships of populations than superficial anatomical characteristics like skin color. If you were to judge by skin color, Africans and Australians would appear to be closely related. When you look at their blood chemistry, however, they turn out to be about as far apart as two human populations can be; their dark skins are merely a shared adaptation to living under a tropical sun. …

… Caucasians and Negroids are more closely related to each other than either is to the third major population grouping, the Mongoloids … [which contains] Australians and American Indians as well as Asians …

… Mitochondrial genes … are inherited only from your mother, who received them from her mother, who got them from her mother, and so on back through a chain of mothers. … If you are male, your mitochondrial lineage will die out no matter how many children you have, unless you have a sister who gives birth to a daughter and continues the line into the future. Unperturbed by the genetic reshuffling going on inside the nucleus with every generation, mitochondrial DNA [lodged in the cellular structures outside the nucleus] serves as a sort of genetic tracer bullet, lighting up the route to the past.

… The only reason one person’s mitochondrial DNA differs from another’s is simply the passage of time [since they had a common ancestor.]

… There [is] very little difference between any two people’s mtDNA, suggesting that everyone’s common ancestor had lived surprisingly recently. … the pattern of variation in mtDNA among the five populations often corresponded to geographic and ethnic origin. … the Old World populations sorted out into two distinct groups: African and non-African, with the African mtDNA types showing much more variation than the non-African ones.

Taken together, [these] results suggested that there had been a recent, single point of origin for the modern human race. There were two ways of determining where that origin had been, and these came in conflict. If the mutations in human mitochondria occur steadily through time, and if more mutations have accumulated in Africa than anywhere else, then Africa should be the homeland whence all populations have spring. [It was] found, however, that the type of human mitochondria most closely related to that of other primates popped up in Asians more frequently than in other populations, suggesting instead that the point of origin was somewhere in Asia. … (Shreve 1995, 57, 58, 59–60, 63, 65)

More research was done and it was shown that:

… A European woman’s mtDNA might resemble an African’s more closely than that of another European. … Humans all over the world are amazingly similar, genetically more alike … than two subspecies of gorilla in Africa that are separated by only a few hundred miles.

… The simplest explanation is that all human races had originated in Africa … The ultimate point of convergence was the same for everyone: a single African woman whose mitochondria gave rise to all existing human types. …

… [I]t would have taken between 140,000 and 290,000 [estimated] years of steadily accumulating mutations to account for the number of variations they found among living Mitochondrial types. …

When Eve was supposed to have lived … the Homo erectus migration out of Africa was already very ancient history … The common ancestor of all non-African people [e.g. white] would be younger still. [This genetically isolated population] remained there [in Africa] for thousands of years … Later, perhaps as recently as 50,000 years ago, this one group must have left Africa, pushing north and east.

On this point the latent conflict between the geneticists and the anthropologists erupted into open war. Unlike the earlier erectus migrants, Eve’s descendants would not have arrived in a humanless landscape. By one estimate, some 1.3 million members of our genus were living on earth 50,000 years ago, a good many of them spread throughout Eurasia. These ancient Eurasians were not demi-apes living in trees; they were our trusted European familiars, the Neandertals, along with other large-brained folk in Asia … And, of course, these older Europeans and Asians were passing Mitochondrial genes down through the generations, spinning on through their daughters and their daughters’ daughters. Then suddenly, all of the lines stopped. … there is no trace of them in modern people. They have simply vanished from the genetic legacy of the human species. …

“If populations representing the earlier inhabitants of Eurasia had contributed to the living human gene pool, we’d expect to find Mitochondrial types around today that are five times more variable,” Stoneking told me. “They just don’t seem to be there.”

…

“The best explanation for why you don’t see these ancient non-African mitochondria is that they are not part of the modern human lineage in the first place,” Stoneking concluded. “In other words, the African people replaced the residents without interbreeding with them.” (Shreeve 1995, 66, 67–68, 69)

Allan Wilson wrote in Science magazine, “Some people don’t like our conclusions.” As Shreve observed, in this case, some people “happened to include the majority of anthropologists alive (p. 70).²

At about the same time the above book was being written, the Cassiopaeans had this to say about the subject:

September 24, 1995

A: Who, or what made you?
Q: (RC) The Creator. (L) Prime Creator.
A: How? And who is Prime Creator?
Q: (L) Everything, I guess.
A: You are “Prime Creator.” Prime Creator manifests in you. But … who was secondary?
Q: (RC) The Sons of God? The Elohim?
A: Who is that? Remember, your various legends are “seen through a veil.”
Q: (L) … Are the Orions these secondary creators?
A: Here comes a shocker for you … one day, in 4th density, it will be your descendants mission to carry on the tradition and assignment of seeding the 3rd density universe, once you have the adequate knowledge!!!
Q: (L) If the Orion STS brought the Celts here, were the Celts, while they lived on Kantek, in the form they are in now?
A: They were lighter in appearance.
Q: (RC) Well, I read that it was the Pleiadians. And the Hebrews were originally the Hoovids who came from Sirius … (L) You have told us on other occasions that the Semitic peoples were remnants of the Atlanteans, and yet they are quite unlike …
A: Whoa!! Wait a minute, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. First things first. What RC said was not entirely factual. Remember, there is much disinformation to weed through.
Q: (RC) What did I say that was not factual?
A: In this part of your 3rd and 4th density universe, specifically your “galaxy” it is the region known as Orion that is the one and only indigenous home of human type beings … reflect on this! Indigenous home base, not sole locator. What you are most in need of review of is the accurate profile of “alien” data.
Q: (RC) I thought that humans originated in Lyra and then a war broke out there and they ended up in Orion.
A: Lyra is not inhabited. There have been homes in all places, but some were/are transitory, and some are not. Pay attention to Orion! This is your ancestral home, and your eventual destination. Here is the absolutely accurately accurate profile of Orion to follow: This is the most heavily populated region of your Milky Way galaxy! This is a region that extends across 3rd and 4th density space for a distance as vast as the distance between your locator and it. There are 3,444 inhabited “worlds” in this region. Some are planets as you know them. Some are artificially constructed planetoids. Some are floating space barges. And some are “satellites.” There are primary homes, traveling stations and incubator laboratories all in 2nd, 3rd and 4th densities. There are overseer zones in 5th and 6th densities. Approximately one half is STO and one half is STS. Together, along with many other colonies, located elsewhere, this is called, in translation, Orion Federation. Orions created grays in 5 varieties, as cybergenetic beings, and installed them on Zeta Reticuli 1, 2, 3, and 4, as well as on 2 planets orbiting Barnard’s Star. The Reptilians also inhabit 6 planets in the Orion region in 4th density, and are owned by the Orion STS as slaves, and, in some cases, pets!!! The name “Orion” is the actual native name, and was brought to Earth directly. Study the legend of the “god” of Orion for parallels.
Q: (L) Are the Orion STS the infamous redheaded Nordic aliens?
A: Yes, and all other humanoid combinations.
Q: (L) Okay, if it started with the Nordic types, and that is where the other humanoid combinations came from, what genetic combinations were used for human beings? Black people, for instance, since they are so unlike Nordics?
A: The Nordic genes were mixed with the gene pool already available on Earth, known as Neanderthal.
Q: (L) What was the genetic combination used to obtain the Oriental races?
A: Orientals come from a region known in your legends as “Lemuria,” and are a previous hybridization from 7 genetic code structures from within Orion Union, designed to best fit the earth climate and cosmic ray environment then existent on Earth.
Q: (L) Okay, what about the Semitic and Mediterranean peoples?
A: Each time a new flock was “planted,” it was engineered to be best suited to the environment where it was planted. Aryans are the only exception, as they had to be moved to Earth in an emergency.
Q: (L) If races are engineered on earth to be “best suited,” what factors are being drawn from or considered regarding the Semitic race?
A: They are not engineered on Earth, but in Orion lab as all others. They were “planted” in the Middle East.

Now, notice this last phrase: “Human types are genetically engineered in Orion labs.” This means that they must use the same mitochondria as the basis, changing and recombining only the nuclear DNA. If this is so, then it would explain why all humans have the same mother. It would also explain why this mother is so recent. But, of course, without admitting to the interference possibility from a quasi-physical higher density – fourth density ­– these problems may never be understood. The Cassiopaeans did have something to say about the Neanderthal enigma.

February 11, 1995

Q: (L) What happened to Neanderthal man?
A: Removed by Lizzies to other planets.
Q: (L) Is that removed as in taken off the planet physically?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What planet were they taken to?
A: Others.
[…]
Q: You said that Neanderthal man had been taken by the Lizzies to another planet, now, I don’t want to know what other planet, but I would like to know what state, evolutionary speaking, is Neanderthal man in at present, as we measure time?
A: No progress, still the same.
[…]
Q: When did the Aryans invade India?
A: 8243 years ago.
Q: Who was there before that?
A: Asian tribes and number 3 prototype.
Q: What is a number 3 prototype?
A: Known as Neanderthal man.
Q: And what are we?
A: Number 4 types c and d. Translation into English comprehension.
[…]
Q: (L) Now, you said that the Nephilim were seeded on a planet called D’Ankhiar, as were human beings. When you said we were seeded there, what did you mean?
A: Was proper environment for molecularization.
Q: (L) Are you saying that the physical bodies on planet Earth, the various types of mankind such as Neanderthal, Cro-Magnon, Australopithicus etc., were generated on that other planet and then brought here?
A: Yes.
[…]
Q: (L) Okay, I had a question I wanted to get in: you said that Neanderthal man was taken off the Earth, and Cro-Magnon man suddenly appeared. Is this Cro-Magnon man really Kantekkian man?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Well, they supposedly existed side by side on the Earth for some time. Did they intermix or intermarry?
A: Marriage?!
Q: (L) Well, you know what I mean! Genetic intermixing.
A: Can you picture a Neanderthal marriage?
Q: (L) Yeah! The old club ‘em and drag ‘em off by the hair ceremony! (T) It was a ritual … handed down father to son along with the club …

And, of course, the arrival of Cro-Magnon – and his amazing cave art and the sudden impetus to civilization will never be understood either without this perspective though obviously, from the above remark, there is something even more strange about Cro-Magnon.

Clearly, the issue of what kind of man was man before the Fall comes to mind. We already have an idea that he was not precisely fully physical in third-density terms, but was yet somewhat physical. Apparently, being a third-density STO being in alignment with fourth-density STO is an altogether different experience than being a third-density STS being with the concomitant compartmentalization and contraction of being that results in separation and conflict. But, at one point, when discussing these matters with the Cassiopaeans, some clues were given:

April 8, 2000

Q: Now, I have this book entitled Arktos. He [Joscelyn Godwin] says something here that echoes a remark you once made. He writes: “It is a very remarkable thing that enlightenment seems to have come from the north against the common prejudice that the Earth was enlightened as it was populated from south to north. The Scythians are one of the most ancient nations; the Chinese descend from them. The Atlanteans themselves, more ancient than the Egyptians, descend from them.” You said that the civilizing influence came from the north to the south. Of course, all the standard texts claim that civilization came from south to north, starting in Mesopotamia. Now, getting …
A: Okay, just a minute here. Thinking Mesopotamia is the beginning is like thinking that the beginning starts at the 12th chapter.
Q: I know that! The problem is: finding artifacts. I’ve been searching and digging, and I find a little bit here and there, but my God! Either nothing survived …
A: Artifacts have a limited shelf life!

This remark could be taken a couple of ways, though I didn’t notice it at the time. On the one hand, it could refer to the fact that few organic artifacts survive the ravages of time; on the other hand, it could refer to the fact that, even if such artifacts are found, they disappear rather quickly, as has been noted time and again, due to academic denial that they can exist. And, in some cases, it seems that direct action has been taken by the academic community to remove from the shelf what does not fit their theories.

Q: Exactly! The problem is that they’ve got specimens of humanoid types from 100 to 200 thousand years ago, and even further, but no specimens of modern man that are that old. Why is this so? Are they just looking in the wrong places?
A: Specimens survive by sheer luck.
Q: So, they are lucky that they have any specimens at all. Who knows, when they find a very ancient specimen of a modern type human, they won’t believe it – it will be called an anomaly! There are artifacts that are extremely ancient, which give evidence of the presence of modern type man, and they just simply argue themselves to death over them.
A: Yes.
Q: But, during the time Neanderthal man was on the Earth, did he live alongside modern man?

A: Yes. Except modern type man was different then.
Q: In what ways?
A: DNA and psycho/electrical frequencies.
Q: Does this mean that their physical appearance was different from what we consider to be modern man?
A: Radiance.
Q: What do you mean “radiance?”
A: You find out!
Q: Oh, that’s interesting. Well, there are legends that the Northern people had light in their veins. Very ancient belief. Is this what you are referring to?
A: Maybe.
Q: Was this light related to the hemoglobin level, the iron level in the blood?
A: Maybe.
Q: Did they have a much higher iron level in their blood?
A: Possibly … .
Q: Okay, part of the ancient legend of Arktos was that, in very ancient times the Earth was different because it had a vertical axial orientation. This contributed to the Golden Age or the Edenic condition. Is this, in fact, one of the conditions that existed in the Golden Age?
A; Well, yes, but still some puzzle pieces needed.
Q: I noticed also that there are several ballpark type figures given for the precessional cycles. Apparently there is not a whole lot of agreement as to how long this cycle is, exactly. I notice that, if you divide 309,882 years by 12, you come out right in the ballpark of 12 precessional cycles. Is this the reason that the zodiac was set up with twelve signs or houses?
A: Related, yes.
Q: Now, since all the recent conjecture about the precessional cycle has really gone all over the place, it is my thought that the real reason for the ancient clues about this cycle are to inform us that the length of 12 of these cycles is a grand cycle, and that this is the big clue.
A: Needs some study by you.
Q: One of the interesting things about this Northern civilizational factor is that one of the hallmarks of the Aryan attitude is the male dominated religion. When did the masculine religion take over? Was this always the tendency or leaning of the Aryan group?
A: Involves more than religion. Religion is the facilitator.
Q: Facilitator of what?
A: Customary psycho/social habitué.
Q: Customary to whom?

A: Those whom you refer to as Aryans.

Q: Where did they acquire the habit of a masculine oriented religion? Everybody else was worshipping the goddess in one form or another. But this male dominated theology was the distinguishing characteristic of the Northern peoples. Where did they come up with this?
A: Originated on home planet.
Q: Kantek?
A: For all intents and purposes.
Q: Okay, when they were on their home planet, why did they develop a masculine religion as opposed to a feminine one, considering the fact that women are the source of life, in certain terms?
A: In your density, masculinism/feminism is essentially a roll of “the dice.” Remember, at higher levels gender is nonexistent.
Q: Well, the problem I am having here is this: the masculine religion is monotheistic, essentially.
A: In your references.
Q: The Aryans always thought they were better than everybody else …
A: They were more advanced than the company they found themselves amongst.
Q: But then, as far as I can tell, the Hebrew monotheism is also derived from the Aryan, monotheistic, male dominated religion. It then fathered Christianity, and that has been the whole patriarchal, kill-’em-all-and-let-God-sort-’em-out war mongering thing under which we have lived for over 2,000 years. This is the Western, European mind … it came from the Aryans, from the North; it was the so-called civilizing influence in nearly every respect that you can track. The cohesiveness and dominance of this type of thinking was able to civilize, but then civilization involves dominance, killing, war, territory, the Hitler scene, the whole nine yards. All of this is antithetical to all that you promote as far as being desirable. Yet, you have said that you were in contact with the Northern peoples for millennia. Yes, Cassiopeia is a northern constellation, and probably figured in the early myths of these peoples in ways we cannot know, but the whole thing is that they represent all that is STS.
A: But so do you, so then why did we contact you?
Q: Well. I don’t buy into that whole monotheistic, dominator, warmongering, make everybody conform to one way of thinking head-trip!
A: So, you think all individuals conformed then, or is it the soul that counts in the final analysis?
Q: Okay, obviously all individuals are different, and some did not conform then, either.
A: And neither do you.
Q: Point taken. I am just having a hard time with this. I wish you would just tell me! Who interacted with these Aryans to give them this male dominated monotheistic idea that they then sought to impose on every other human being on the planet – and are still trying!
A: Interactions were transdensity.

So, having gone through this brief history of mankind, and why we are here in the first place, we come back again to that most interesting remark: desire based imbalance led to material existence. It seems that it was an okay desire, because it was based on wanting to accelerate the process of reunion with the One. But we see that this wanting to grow up so fast was like the Prodigal Son who wanted to take his inheritance and travel to a far country.

Things in the far country were not quite what the Son thought they were. Everything had a price, and he soon spent all his inheritance ­– lost his original status – and found himself enslaved to live with and care for the pigs.

This reference to living and eating with pigs has a deep esoteric significance. The pig is the animal of Set. It is said to represent the darker side of mankind that does not strive toward the light. These are those “soul units” who choose to remain as matter and never seek to wake up (see the discussion of psychopathy in volume 7). More than this, the pig represents what was desired in a very deep way, as we will soon discover. You see, the pig is one of the few animals that sweats. This characteristic of the pig ­– that it exudes water through its skin as humans do – represents an esoteric symbol that is an amazing disjecta membra of long vanished scientific knowledge. And this knowledge relates to the very thing we are going to be discussing: feelings.

Remember, it was the desire to feel, in a very specific sense, that led to the Fall. And it is this that we are going to carefully examine to determine if such an idea can be true.

Read again the following, carefully:

Q: (L) Did, at any time, the human race live for a long time in an Edenic state, where they were able to use bodies and still have a spiritual connection?
A: Yes. But not long. No addiction takes long to close the circle.
Q: (L) So, mankind was addicted to pleasuring the self?
A: Became quickly.

In the previous section I made the remark that we are made addicts inside our own skins. This might have sounded like hyperbole to some readers, and a mere analogy to others. I would like to make it clear that it is neither. It is a cold, hard fact. We are addicts to the molecules of our emotions and, by extension, to those things and people who provide our fix by stimulating the chemicals to be released.

Terry Burnham and Jay Phelan write in Mean Genes:

Most of us would feel cheated if we bought a car or a microwave and it came without instructions. But our most important possessions – body and mind – come with no such guide, leaving us searching haphazardly for satisfaction: a dollop of exercise, thirteen minutes of sex, a Happy Meal, a cocktail, and a sport-utility vehicle. …

When we drive a car or operate a microwave, our orders are carried out exactly as we command. The machine doesn’t talk back or have an agenda of its own – at least not yet. On the other hand, if we tell our brain, as part of a New Year’s resolution, to cut down on fatty foods, it most likely will let out a hearty laugh and continue to set off bells and whistles of approval when the dessert cart rolls around.

Our brain, for better or worse, is not an obedient servant. It has a mind of its own. Imagine that you are two things: a personality who has likes, dislikes, desires, and dreams. But inside your body there is also a “machine,” your brain, that processes commands and acts on those likes, dislikes, desires, and dreams. It fights you all the time. And it usually wins.

… Why do we have battles over controlling our own behavior? And why are these battles so hard to win? Are cats and dogs obsessed with fighting addictions, controlling their weight, and remaining faithful to their mates? Do chimpanzees regularly resolve to be less selfish?

In a creepy campfire legend, a baby-sitter alone in a house receives increasingly menacing phone calls. Terrified, she contacts the police, who put a tap on her phone. After the boogieman calls again, the cops frantically phone her, screaming, “We’ve traced the call. It’s coming from inside the house! Get out!”

Similarly, the source of our self-control problems lies within us … but we can’t get out or leave them behind. Manipulative media, greedy businesses, and even our friends and family play roles in nurturing our demons. Still, most of our self-control problems stem from our impulses to do things that are bad for us or for those whom we love.

A visit to any bookstore reveals the nature of our struggles. Glancing at the bestsellers, we can see what’s on people’s minds. There are dozens of books on finding love, losing weight, and creating wealth. Conspicuously absent are a host of other topics. Where are the books entitled How to Build a Bigger Beer Gut, Ten Steps to Frivolous Spending, or Nurturing the Infidel Within? (Burnham & Phelan 2000, 1–2)

Even though they are writing in a lighthearted way, these guys aren’t kidding. And it’s even worse than they let on. If the reader will recall the movie The Matrix, they will surely remember the scene of the vast warehouse of human beings suspended in pods filled with a gelatinous fluid, connected to a vast energy storage system by many feeder lines embedded deep in their flesh. These were the humans in the Matrix. Their reality was totally illusory, created and maintained by a giant computer that coordinated all the individual realities so that their dreams were, in a sense, as One. And through the experiences that were being fed to them, they generated in their bodies various amounts of power that fed the system itself.

Though this was an allegory – and where the writers came up with the inspiration we don’t know – it is very close to the truth based on what the Cassiopaeans have told us, and supported by corroboration from many sources.

Can we prove it? Nope. But the fact is, no other view of the reality of cosmic connections can be proven either. And this has one thing that the subjective views do not have: empirical evidence. If the reader will take the time to study the matter deeply, to not be afraid to look at the patterns of Rubik’s Cubes and see how chaotic they are, and to work with trying to align the colors into coherent patterns, the evidence will gradually lead to a perspective that is objective, not based on faith and feelings.

We see some of the more terrible things the Cassiopaeans have told us, and which we have read about in various reports and exposés of underground bases and truly revolting mind control experiments, in Michael Topper’s (admittedly dense) work:

In the conscious domain of the higher densities, light indeed becomes the overt mediating term, the common coinage and efficient aim – and that both for positive and negative realms. Yet whereas in the positive realms the [mode] is to draw the developing soul toward deep degrees of expansion into light, in the corresponding negative realms the object is, rather, a … development of appropriate mind/body mechanical means of devouring more light, stuffing the light-energy into the voracious hole or constitutional void of emotional lack comprising the negative state of the ego-soul altogether.

The work of the negative being is to determine the formulae, extort and coax the technical keys of force-opening the internal mind/body centers and corresponding energy fields. The negative’s business is to plunder the rich beds of energy-nutriment – the various treasure-troves of the vast creative domains where “loosh” or psychic energy-food is manufactured in abundance.

… Light isn’t inimical to the negative orientation, as is portrayed in our superstitions and folklore; like its positive counterpart, the negative recognizes and overtly values light as sustenance; food for producing integral reactions toward progressively higher alignments. Just as all matter – the food of this dimension – is intellectually understandable as a kind of packaged “light-value” woven in phosphates of the ATP molecule, so light is overtly valued as the energy-essence/lunchbox of the higher densities.

So, whereas higher-density positive entities might be considered light beings, higher density negatives are more like … light eaters.

They are the light eaters, the devourers of light. That’s why they’re associated with darkness, because the light is lapped up into the cavernous black hole of their congenital emptiness, their persistent lack. Light is sucked into the abyss where their heart should be, in order to try to compensate or fill in for the love that isn’t there.

All the massive operations they undertake [throughout the universe] are just a means of “cornering the market” on energy, monopolizing all the known fields of light or light potential. The expanding order they attempt to impose, the totalitarian control over increasingly large numbers of people, is the fantastical and internally self-contradictory project of coercing everything in creation to work for them, to cultivate and keep the fields of their energy reserves and to furnish self-replenishing herds of emotional source-nutriment which can be converted into useful energy or light-capital. Since the negative beings can’t generate an important light-energy source themselves, i.e. the emotional range of energy-values belonging to the heart, they steal the manipulated and artificially regulated emotional reserves of the beings harnessed in thrall to them …

This [relates to] the rumors circulating around about the underground Dulce facilities where aliens have been reported to take infernal baths in vats of liquid stewed with human and animal parts, a kind of diabolic broth of enzymes and hormones they’re supposed to absorb for nutriment through their skin.

… Hormones of the human ductless systems and various kinds of human and animal enzymes, neurotransmitters, lymphocytes and extract of digestive chyle furnishes variable measures of a radiant energy-value; especially the human reproductive system – the specific cells of reproduction are just saturated with subtle energy-charge …

There are in fact multiple uses to which these natural resources of the human system may be put. As grim as it might seem, the aliens perceived to indulge that hormonal baptism are generally biobot replicants, hybrid forms created from genetic tissue of humans, animals and even plants; they have vestigial digestive systems, virtually inoperative because these types of biobot-form follow the general template of the higher dimensional negative beings only in more grounded and stabilized, physical terms.

The higher-dimensional beings in their own context have subtle, vertical filamental axes attached to the subtle nerve-networks of [both the biobots and human beings]. [In humans], these filamental, ethereal straws are drawn into the body through the etheric chakras that connect the body to the higher-density systems. These chakra systems correspond to the clusters of neuropeptide receptors, and it is the objective of the STS forces to stimulate the production of vast amounts of high light energy values contained in these peptides so that they can feed on the energy rich extracts of the human reproductive and glandular structures …

Tremendous concentrations of desirable energy-values, laced with the emotional juices that generate them, are involved in neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine, and in epinephrine/norepinephrine, and other hormones of the sympathetic systems. Chemicals of psychic stress are very charged [whether they are of a blissful nature, or pure unmitigated terror.]

The 4th density consciousness, connected to [the physiology of numerous human beings] by these astro-etheric threads and plexiform webs of control, can send signals to its 3rd density marionettes, generating emotions that force choices that result in any number of activities resulting in enriched feeding. (“Précis on the Good, The Bad, and What Curls Up Under a Rock”)

Now, this idea is most definitely “out there.” Certainly none of us would wish to contemplate such a control system as is allegorized in The Matrix. It’s good Hollywood, but we can leave the theater and go home and be secure in the belief that it is only movie magic. Or can we?

Well, it seems that this is not even a new idea. There are numerous sculptures in medieval churches that are said to represent sinners being punished in Hell or Purgatory. It is thought that they are “visual exhortations to renounce sin.” However, we find that there’s another explanation for these images, given by the teacher of Mark Hedsel in Zelator, which I shall include here with following remarks.

 

From the west front of Saint-Pierre, Moissac. 14th century, after Witkowski.Left:Wood engraving of demon grasping a woman.Right: Wood engraving of demons riding on the back of a beggar and a miser.

‘The first thing we must realize is that the sculptors were not, as we might imagine, portraying a future state in Hell or Purgatory. The images are portrayals of ordinary human beings ­– of ordinary sinners in life. The woman attacked by reptiles, is a libertine. This is why her private parts and breasts are receiving such attention from the monster-toads, and why the demon who grasps her is being so sexually explicit with the snake.

‘The pair carrying demons piggyback are intended to reveal the sin of Avarice: the seated figure, clutching his moneybags, is a miser, refusing to give alms to the beggar.

‘However, these people are not in Hell: they are portrayals of Etheric and Astral forms. They reveal people as they would be seen by someone with developed clairvoyant vision, able to perceive on the spiritual planes. … A true clairvoyant would be able to see the hideous reptiles and possessing demons.

‘ … The truth is that, as a consequence of the libertine woman’s predisposition to sin in a particular way, her soul is constantly being devoured by monstrous forms. No matter how beautiful or alluring her physical body may be, her Etheric body is – as an immediate consequence of sin – darkened by demonic forms that devour her. I repeat – this is not a picture of punishment in Hell, but of an unhealthy Etheric body, in life. …

‘ … The nakedness of her body is intended as in indication that it is her etheric body only – what the Moissac artists would have described as the ens venenei, or the vegetabilis. This explains why she is lifting her arms, grasping at her hair. This is the gesture of the Etheric soul. The same gesture is found in the Christian images painted and scratched on the walls of the catacombs in Rome, and has been called the “orans”, or praying gesture. In fact, such images are derived from the Egyptian hieroglyphic for the ka.

‘These hints leave us in no doubt that the woman is alive, and that we are being privileged to look into the state of her Etheric body. … This … is an example of the use of an occult blind.

‘Now, turn your attention to the second engraving … The person gifted with clairvoyant vision will see the beggar approaching the miser on the Astral plane. He will see the demons directing this transaction: the demons are, so to speak, bypassing the Ego of the men. This is no human transaction, but a demonic one. The demons sit above the heads of the men to show that they are gripping on to their Egos. Do not forget that our word possession is derived from a Latin word meaning literally “sitting on.” …

‘Now, in contrast to the nakedness of the woman, the miser and the beggar are clothed. This may be explained in terms of the need to indicate their ranks ­– the beggar is in torn clothing with only one trouser leg. We may judge from the clothing of the seated man that he is a person of some substance. However, there is another reason why the pair are clothed: this covering indicates that they are being depicted on the next level up from the Etheric – that is, on the Astral plane – on what in the days when this sculpture was made would have been called the animalis, or the ens astrale.

‘We may have little doubt that the clothing is meant as a kind of Astral mask, for neither man wears shoes. This is an arcane technique for showing that neither is standing on the physical Earth. The most “Earthy” element in this portrayal is the heavy moneybag: this appears to be tied around his neck, as a punishment, weighing down his soul. …

‘The demons who possess the couple are Astral beings: the wings of the one on the left indicate that it can “fly” on the Astral planes. The horns of the other, crescent in form, remind us that the demons are linked with the Moon. However, just as the woman does not know that her Etheric body is being devoured by monstrous forms, so the miser does not know that his Astral body is being weighed down by his riches, and by the demon which grips its legs around his neck. This is not so much symbolism as a direct portrayal of what can be perceived on the spiritual plane, by those with eyes to see.’ (Hedsel 2000, 62–63)

We note right away that there is a sort of righteous flavor to this interpretation. It is given in archaic terms of sin and demons and possession. We already have the idea that the ancient stories of demons and lesser gods were actual descriptions of encounters with fourth-density denizens; beings we now refer to in the modern day as aliens. Descriptions of these things were given in languages that are not technical, much like modern English, which constantly reinvents itself, creating and adding new terms as science progresses in its understanding.

Later, occultists, or those seeking for answers in these representations created by those who had received this information, were not privy to the inside information and did not understand the literal nature of these images, nor the true reality they portrayed. They began to interpret them in terms of astral and etheric entities, rather than what they really were: energy symbols of the interaction with fourth-density STS beings.

Having the understanding of fourth-density reality, we can see that the woman described as a sinner and a libertine, may not be either of those at all – merely an ordinary human who is asleep in the Matrix and whose sexual energies are providing nutriment to those levels. That the creatures are attached to her indicates the fibrous network of the energy conduits, and it is clear that the monster-man holding the snake as though it were a phallus while at the same time gripping the arm of the woman, is meant to show us that there is a being at another level who is behind this activity. And, in addition to the upraised arms being a symbol of the ka, the hair is also a symbol of virility or virtue and the woman is hanging onto it for dear life, battling the loss of her life force.

In the second image, I don’t think that we are being shown a beggar approaching a miser. I have a slightly different take on this for a couple of reasons. The rolled up pants leg is one of the accoutrements of the Masonic initiation, and other than that I do not perceive that the man is dressed in rags. The seated figure has crossed legs – a Rosicrucian symbol – and the bag of unknown contents is suspended around his neck by a cord – yet another occult symbol. The position of his hands as well as the hands of the demon on the left figure are also symbols.

My immediate reaction to these figures is that they represent a body of occultists in high positions. The man on the left may represent the social and educational aspects of control, as he is a traveler seeking wisdom, hampered or directed by the being on his shoulder. The man on the right seems to be a ruling figure, representing governments controlled by the creature on his shoulders. That these two creatures are in cahoots is clear by their communication with each other, but it is also clear that they are of two different types, and that the men are not having any interaction between them (their respective creatures) of a human nature. That they are barefoot has an even deeper significance: they have given away the ruby slippers. They are sold out; co-opted; part of the STS hierarchy.

So, in effect, we are seeing a graphic portrayal of ancient knowledge, clinched by the reference to the Moon – a base of fourth-density activities. And in the present time there are many individuals who are seeing the shape-shifting or “overshadowing of humans by Reptilian creatures. The mind produces symbols for what the eyes, and even the clairvoyant eyes, see. These events of shape shifting, or overshadowing that many are taking to be an astral demonic possession in archaic terms, are more likely a development of trans-density awareness that is still being interpreted in the mind in a symbolic way. It is very likely not a spirit possession but a clairvoyant seeing of the Control System, imaged in ways the mind is set up to operate.

Returning now to Topper’s suggestion that there is a substance produced by the human sensorium that is an addictive drug for fourth-density STS, this was a subject mentioned by the Cassiopaeans at one of the very earliest contacts. According to Topper, this substance can only be generated through the psychic pattern of terror, and can only be catalytically effective when obtained from a still living though on-the-verge-of-death-from-terror subject. I will admit that I was so horrified by this information, so much so that my project very nearly ended right then and there.

Like everyone else, I had the idea that only the good things (by human – or my – definition) could exist at higher levels. It was only later when I read the comment of Ra: “The All blinks neither at the darkness nor at the light,” that I realized there was a very deep truth being presented in such a comment. And to truly understand this remark in the most important way, is to understand that this “not blinking” at anything is the true measure of the level of contact. Truth is the only value at the highest levels, and human judgments of what is nice or not nice does not even figure in to the equations. So, a communicating entity that makes a judgment as to whether this or that information is useful or not, is blinking and gives away his level in that act. And, I suppose it could also be inferred from this that the individual who filters is also blinking, and thereby judging.

But, getting to what the Cassiopaeans had to say:

July 16, 1994

Q: (L) Bob Lazar referred to the fact that aliens supposedly refer to humans as containers. What does this mean?
A: Storage for later use.
Q: (L) Used for what?
A: 94 per cent of all population. All are containers; 94 per cent will be used.
Q: (L) Used for what?
A: Consumption.
Q: (L) You mean eaten?
A: Total consumption.
Q: (L) What do you mean by consumption? Ingested?
A: Consumed for ingredients.
Q: (L) Ingredients for what?
A: New race. Important. 13 years approximately when project will be finished.
Q: (L) Why are humans consumed?
A: They are used for parts.
Q: (L) We don’t understand. How can humans be used for parts?
A: Reprototype. The vats exist. Missing persons often go there and especially missing children.
Q: (L) Do we have any protection?
A: Some.
Q: (L) How can we protect ourselves and our children?
A: Inform them. Don’t hide the truth from children.
Q: (L) How does truth protect us?
A: Awareness protects. Ignorance endangers.
Q: (L) Why tell children such horrible things?
A: They need to know.
Q: (L) What is the purpose of this project?
A: New life here.
Q: (L) Are the aliens using our emotions and energies?
A: Correct; and bodies too. Each Earth year 10 percent more children are taken.
Q: (L) Do they suffer?
A: Some. Bits of children’s organs removed while they are wide awake. Kidneys first; then next feet; next jaw examined on table; tongues cut off; bones stress tested; pressure placed on heart muscle until it bursts.
Q: (L) Why are you telling us this awful stuff?
A: You must know what the Consortium is doing. This is done mostly to Indian children.
Q: (L) Why are things like this being done?
A: There is a big effort on behalf of Orions and their human brethren to create a new race and control it as well as the rest of humanity.
Q: (L) What happens to the souls? Is this project physical only?
A: Physical; and souls recycled.
Q: (L) Where do the souls go?
A: Back here for the most part.
Q: (L) Do some go elsewhere?
A: Some go to other planets.
Q: (L) Who is responsible for this project?
A: Consortium.
Q: (L) This is sick!
A: Sick is subjective.
Q: (L) But this whole thing is so awful.
A: We understand your feelings, but all does not conform to your perspective.
Q: (L) Why is this happening to Earth?
A: Karma.
Q: (L) What kind of karma could bring this?
A: Atlantis.
Q: (L) What can protect us?
A: Knowledge.
Q: (L) How do we get this knowledge?
A: You are being given it through this source now.
Q: (L) How does the knowledge of what you have told us help us?
A: Gives great defense. … Just knowing about it gives psychic defense.
[…]
Q: (L) Is there any way we can prevent Orion abductions?
A: No.
Q: (L) Why?
A: It would interfere with universal law of free will and service to self.
Q: (L) But we don’t want to be abducted. Can’t we stop it?
A: Not likely. They have more power than you.
Q: (L) Well then, why can’t you help us?
A: Would interfere in natural progression of your race and theirs. The Jews called upon us to save them and we could not. And, natives of your land called upon us and we could not save them from your race; we could not stop that either. It is natural progression, see?
Q: (L) Are we going to be wiped out by aliens as part of this natural progression?
A: Maybe. What makes you think you are special?
Q: (L) Jesus told us God loves us. Is this true?
A: Yes. But it is the soul that matters, not the body. The body dies not the soul.
Q: (L) Well, this whole thing just gives us the creeps.
A: You are energy. There is an energy that comes from the soul and body connection; later the body is used for parts.
Q: (L) What are they using our energy and bodies for?
A: To create a new race. Theirs is fading out.
Q: (L) Well, do they just take people and kill them and do what with them?
A: They slice them up.
Q: (L) Do they die?
A: Maximum matter and energy transfer occurs during this type of transition.
Q: (L) In other words, you are saying that a slow painful death gives them the most of what they want? This is totally sick.
A: You asked for truth. You say it is sick but it is merely the ultimate form of service to self.

(At this point A___ described reading a passage in a book which stated that Native Americans believed a slow torturous death of an enemy gave them more power.)
A: What about your lab animals? Is that not service to self as well? What about unwanted insects et cetera?
Q: (L) We were here first!
A: So were the insects. Grays now want your planet.
Q: (L) That is sick.
A: Is natural progression sick?
Q: (L) Is what is happening something like what Jesus described in the parable of the wheat where the workers come in to take out the weeds first?
A: Close.
Q: (L) What kind of people is this being done to?
A: Low level humans.
Q: (L) What happens to the high-level humans?
A: Some will survive.

And, as Topper so delicately puts it: “I leave the rest to your imagination.”

It also seems to be very probable that much of the more horrific stuff that is being reported by various escapees from various mind control programs, or from underground bases where they have witnessed unparalleled scenes of horror, may have been deliberately exposed to projected and controlled thought forms. These individuals have been selected to escape from their captors or programmers, to be returned to the regular world so as to begin circulating their fearful and depressing stories. This is calculated to induce an atmosphere of terror, the cumulative energies of which will, of course, serve admirably as food for fourth-density STS. Another aim, suggests Topper, is to instill an overall atmosphere of depression, despair and ultimate defeatism before they even surface on any large scale to the daylight of general mass perception. In this way, they can devitalize any potential resistance or anger before the fact.

There is an observable tendency of fourth-density STS beings to continuously move in relentless stages of materialization that begin with the playful nightmare of the dream state, into waking reality. And this brings us back again to the idea that knowledge protects.

We can pretty well surmise that there are experiments taking place with human beings similar to those that will be described in the next section. And every other range of experimentation that humans undertake in the various compartments of our world likely have a counterpart in fourth-density reality. It’s not much different from the image of the newborn baby being plugged into the Matrix in the movie to become a source of energy for the system.

It seems to be that the nature of the far country of the Prodigal Son, the reality on which we have spent our inheritance or energy, is the Matrix.

The aforementioned session was a watershed experience for me. I had the option of jumping back into safe and cozy denial, or I could look at the information that was being given and evaluate it based on whether or not there was any corroboration, i.e. was it true?

And then, of course, even if it was true, what could be the possible motivation behind the Cassiopaeans even telling me this? I can guarantee you that if you had been present, you would have realized that every question I asked was framed from a state of near hysteria.

But, what has been the result of knowing these things? What is the fruit of facing the truth? For me, the result has been to ignite a drive for information in order to discover first of all, whether such things could be true, and second of all to acquire the knowledge and awareness that can protect. And, what is more, being exposed to what is has a tendency to condition the mind to not blink at anything.

Am I telling you this to scare you? Are the Cassiopaeans pulling back the curtain to reveal the machinations behind the curtain to terrify you into a state of paralysis?

Well, that’s up to you.

If you are paralyzed by it, you are welcome to go back to the center of your Rubik’s Cube and believe with all your heart and soul that the chaotic colors are arranged as you would like them to be. You are welcome to open your heart to any being that will come along and support you in your delusion, soothing your terror with honeyed words that it’ll be alright. “Just have faith and that nasty real world out there will fade away”, which you can cling to, thereby attaching you to such a consciousness for its own feeding purposes.

If, on the other hand, you begin to understand that knowledge can be applied to moving the colors on the cube into real alignment so that your polarization toward freedom and truth is amplified, thus leveling the playing field; then let us proceed.

Knowledge protects.