In between the MUFON “Demo” session in March of 1995, and the visit of Dr. Santilli in May of the same year, there was another strange concept that the Cassiopaeans introduced to us that relates, it seems, to The Wave. I did not insert it in the chronological sequence because I felt it would have distracted from the series of events that resulted from our interactions with MUFON, but in a certain way, it connects them — though the connection was only apparent in retrospect.
In this session again, in an unusual way, the Cassiopaeans brought up a matter, which led us step by step into the idea they wanted us to grasp; and this time T was the catalyst. I think it would be better for you, the reader, to read it exactly as it happened without any prior commentary, saving all that for afterward. I have put a couple of remarks in italics just so you might keep them in mind.
April 29, 1995
Q: (L) Well, we were a little late getting started tonight…
A: T, was it October 1964?
Q: (L) To what does this question refer?
A: Ask T! Lake, yellow brick and brown brick buildings, cool day, fences, large cobalt colored cylinder, oscillating…
Q: (T) I would have been fourteen. I was a freshman… my father’s cousin had a place at Keuka Lake and we used to go there and visit all the time… fences? I don’t remember anything. I’m sorry. I’m drawing a blank.
A: Images we see… Now we see Victorian houses, green gabled roof… field… brown brick buildings…
Q: (T) October?
A: We asked you.
Q: (T) Dark blue? (J) Cobalt blue. (T) Dark blue, almost a black color? (J) Cobalt is a bright blue.
A: Cobalt is metallic navy blue.
Q: (T) Well, my brother wasn’t home… I know what you are talking about! Yes, I did see something. I don’t know if it was in October of 1964, but I remember seeing it!
A: Okay, now we are getting somewhere… what do you think happened to you that day?
Q: (T) I don’t remember anything happening other than that I saw the object; it came floating over the house and then floated off in the other direction. I don’t remember anything else happening. I stood outside, watched it come, watched it go; and I stood outside and watched it for quite some time.
A: Neighborhood, what appearance?
Q: (T) It looked just like the neighborhood. It didn’t seem any different. I don’t remember…
Q: (T) There was a Fifties development out on the edge of the city limits of Rochester, surrounded by most of Kodak — out in that area — most of Rochester; across the street was a field with a schoolyard surrounded by a fence. A large, two-story brown school building, brown, or red brick… that I went to grammar school in. I don’t know about yellow brick buildings, but our house was green at the time and the next door neighbor’s house was yellow at the time with white fancy little trim stuff across the roof. It wasn’t gabled, but it looked gabled. There were little gables over the front doors of most of the houses. The doors came out to the front and there was a little peak. There was a stadium on the other side of the schoolyard, a ways back for Aquinas football games and their stadium. Some fields and one of the last remaining wooded areas that was in the city limits that wasn’t a park down the street… a set of railroad tracks about five blocks to the East. The lake, Lake Ontario, Rochester is right up against it, we were about seven miles, eight miles from there, maybe ten. I used to ride up there on my bike and back… The neighborhood itself didn’t look any different because I watched the thing come in over the field. I remember my mother, I don’t know if my brother was there, but I remember my mother and my neighbor. The neighbor woman was standing out on the front walk talking and they called me because I was in the house watching TV. I don’t know if it was October though because it was still warm, sunny. It came in from high over the West, over a field, by the stadium, came down toward us, and came right toward us. I thought it was moving right at us. It didn’t start moving right at us until we were looking at it…
Q: (T) Yes. Was moving toward us. It seemed to change direction when I came out and started looking at it. It went right over and…
A: Objective was you.
Q: (T) The objective was me? I don’t think I was picked up at that time.
A: Oh yeah?
Q: (T) Well there were people standing there…
A: Time “freezes” during abduction.
Q: (T) The object had the distinctive falling leaf motion to it, which I thought was an extremely odd thing for it to do. It came right over the edge of the house on the side of the house, where, sometime in later years, I had something happen to me when I was in the basement. It was right over where I would have been sleeping…
Q: (T) I thought it sure looked metallic and I wished I had a little pellet gun and could pop a pellet at it; it wasn’t more than about fifty feet up in the air. It was maybe ten to fifteen feet long and maybe about three or four feet around. It looked like a wiener rounded on both ends but not as fat; it was longer and thinner. (F) It looked like a hotdog? (T) It looked metallic to me. It was smooth, perfectly smooth. (L) What are we getting to here? This was obviously brought up for a reason. If T was abducted…
Q: (L) It was a crossroads in T’s life?
A: And now… connection completed.
Q: (T) I’m not following this…
A: Access your recent dreams.
Q: (T) Recent dreams… I dreamed something about moving into a building and I had something that had a power cord or something that went outside… a connection of some kind… I don’t remember them… they are just very vivid. Could something have happened to me just recently that started with that experience?
Q: (T) It has to do with what we are doing here, but this isn’t the completed connection we are talking about?
A: Not exactly.
Q: (T) The connection that was completed was all about something else?
Q: (T) Does it have to do with my job?
A: In part.
Q: (T) Does it have to do with the fact that I am saying certain things to people at work, or wherever I can, when I talk about events that are happening these days and trying to raise their level of thinking on these things?
A: Yes, now, let’s explore your friends and relationships and experiences in the years immediately following the event to see if we can “dig up” something of startling significance!!!
Q: (T) Are we sure this is 1964 and not 1974?
A: T, you know better!
Q: (T) I’m just asking because that event and the event that happened in winter with the voices outside the window and all the weirdness that happened that night seemed to be a lot closer together and that other event happened in the 70s, sometime. That was somewhere close to my trip out to Arizona and the weirdness out there with the car and all that.
A: Oh, there is sooooo much, isn’t there T! It is time to divulge.
Q: (T) After high school. But, in those days I was mainly hanging out with some people I met over at Edison. Tom ****, a lot of people named Tom. I used to go to the lake and take drives around it at night. We just used up gas. I felt comfortable because I did a lot of things but most of the people I knew didn’t get along with each other. I still do this today; I have learned from hard experience that I can’t mix my friends. I learned at that time that every person in any group had a counterpart in any other group. Groups may be different, but they all have the same make-up, and I was always “my” person in each of a number of groups. There was nobody in any of the groups I hung out with that was like me; I was that individual for several groups. Does it have to do with when I got my driver’s license and we all used to drive around a lot out in the country? We drove all through the lakes area…
Q: (T) We used to drive all through the hills out there at night… long drives. (L) Did something happen on one of these drives?
Q: (T) Does this have something to do with that bizarre town I came across one night and never was able to find again? Is that tied in here somehow?
Q: (T) Strangest town I have ever seen. Talk about David Lynch! I was driving down through southwest New York one night. I was out of high school. I used to get stoned then too, so a lot of my experiences aren’t dependable because I got stoned. I went through a town one night down there in the Southern Tier, in the Finger Lakes area, and it was the strangest thing. I have been through all these little towns, and there’s usually people and stuff. Not a lot, but at least somebody around. It was about nine or ten o’clock, and I went through this town; it was two story buildings built right up to this two lane main street, with a little narrow sidewalk, and it was like driving into a canyon, and the buildings went straight up into the air. There was a streetlight every so far, but they were those little yellowish bulbs that don’t cast much light on the street. There was absolutely nobody out there. There was nobody in any of the buildings, they were all boarded up and shut down. It looked like a town but it didn’t look like a town. It went about four blocks. I came back out of it, turned around and drove through it again because I didn’t believe it. I could never find it again, and I didn’t know the name of it.
Q: (S) It was the Twilight Zone… (T) Was this town…?
Q: (L) You drove into another reality. (T) It wasn’t really a town, was it?
Q: (T) It gave me the willies. And, I turned around and drove through it a second time because I didn’t believe it was there. (S) Were you by yourself? (T) Yes, I was all alone. There was nobody with me. One signal light that looked like it was out of the 1920s. Old street lamps… like a ghost town, literally. (L) What are you guys trying to tell us here about T or through T? Was the recent, connected event you mentioned private to T and happened in his life only?
Q: (T) Each of my relationships then was with an individual who thought for themselves, they understood things; they had their own experiences that were different from most people, and knew that most people could not relate or understand. It doesn’t have to be abduction experiences, but they have had life experiences…
A: Yes, but that is the sign of something more significant.
Q: (T) Is it the fact that I am able to form relationships with vastly different types of individuals?
A: All originate from same “plane.”
Q: (L) In other words, he formed relationships with others like himself? And, did they all originate from the same plane, as in somewhere else?
Q: (L) Did the ship we started off with have a lot to do with interacting with all of these other people that T formed friendships and relationships with subsequent to this time?
A: Yes, but not central issue.
Q: (T) Do we all share a common experience?
Q: (L) Do they all share a common origin?
Q: (L) And what is that origin?
Q: (L) Neormm?
A: Closest English equivalent.
Q: (L) Is that a place?
Q: (L) Where is it?
A: Check star guides.
Q: (T) Is this a star? All of us are from another star that I’ve formed relationships like that with — the special ones that I would consider lasting?
A: In perpendicular reality.
Q: (L) All right! Where are we now? We have discovered that T has a thing called a “Perpendicular Reality” that has been running through his life and probably is an ongoing thing, is this correct?
Q: (T) What is a perpendicular reality?
A: Intersection is at realm border.
Q: (L) So, in other words, you could follow along in your mind to the realm border because you have an intersecting reality with it. Is that correct?
A: No. They merge.
Q: (L) Okay, we have discovered the significance of the fact that T is part alien with a perpendicular alien reality that causes him to interact with other people who also have these perpendicular realities. What’s the point? [Laughter] (S) Something to do! (J) It’s a hobby.
A: “Point” is third density concept, and you need “refresher” course!
Q: (T) “Remedial Cassiopaean 101.” (L) Well, I am just trying to understand what this whole thing is all about. What are we getting at here?
A: Then learn from what we communicate to you and what you already have “locked up” inside of you, i.e. time to get the key!
Q: (L) What I think is, maybe everybody does this, right now on the planet; there are always different groups that are forming connections with other people with whom they share an alternate reality. (J) In other words, we are all being attracted to each other? (F) Right. That makes sense. (L) In which case, what alternate reality do we share or do we share no alternate reality and is each person a representative of an alternate reality different from each other and are a connection point?
A: Latter concept is exactly correct!
Q: (T) We are what is common to each other in our group?
A: What did we say about increasing power?
Q: (L) Regarding “keys,” I have heard the concept, written or talked about, that certain people, or perhaps everybody, have locked up inside themselves “pockets of energy,” for lack of a better term, or knowledge as in electromagnetic patterning in their fields… and forming groups in this way would be…
A: Like putting together the pieces of the puzzle.
Q: (L) We are the pieces of the puzzle?
A: Draw on a piece of paper one perpendicular intersection.
Q: [We get paper and draw figure.] (L) Like that?
A: No, make it like an upside down “T”
Q: [T tries again.] (L) Why don’t you just draw it on the board for us? [Clamps pencil next to planchette on piece of paper.] Okay guys, draw! [The planchette draws an inner circle surrounded by an outer circle, connected by seven spokes — rather like a wagon wheel.]
Q: (J) Is this like a crop circle?
A: Has been done, yes. Designates union of perpendicular realities.
Q: (L) Was the town that T went through one of the perpendicular reality towns?
A: Close. You need seven spokes.
Q: (L) There’s that number seven again! Each person in the group is a spoke?
Q: (L) Is there more to this concept that we are going to discover as we go along?
A: Of course!
Q: (L) Once the seven spokes are in place in terms of persons, is that going to increase our power/knowledge exponentially?
Q: (T) Okay, we have the image on the paper with seven spokes. What do we do with it next?
A: Open. Will fall into place, now you must ponder the significance and we must say goodnight!
When reading back over this session with hindsight, it seems to me that the “completed connection” the Cassiopaeans referred to might have been the fact that T brought our little group together with the MUFON group, which then led to the “Demo” session at the second MUFON group, and subsequently, to the “Santilli Session” which had significant repercussions later that were unforeseen by us at the time. But, actually, I think that the hints in this session really deserve deeper analysis, particularly regarding the strange stellar location designated as “Neormm” by the Cassiopaeans. This session is still a puzzle to me, and if anyone has any insights, I will appreciate hearing them.
We did come back to the issue of “Perpendicular Realities” a little later, and the subject was expanded in a very interesting way:
June 17, 1995
Q: (T) Several sessions back when we were discussing “Perpendicular Realities” you were talking about something that happened to me and that I had to look back over my life and analyze my relationships with other people from a certain point up until now and you said that this was a perpendicular reality. What is the definition of a perpendicular reality?
A: The perpendicular reality primarily, though not exclusively, refers to one’s life path and how one’s life path fits together in the cycle or in a wheel when connected with those of a similar life path. If you can picture an inlaid wheel formed by a circle within a circle, and adjoining partitions in a perfect balance, that would be the best representation of perpendicular reality for it does not completely involve one individual’s experience, but rather a group of individuals’ experience for the progression of a greater purpose, if you understand what we mean. This is what we mean when we say: “perpendicular reality.” Picture again, a circle within a circle adjoined by equally spaced partitions in a perfect cycle. That is perpendicular reality.
Q: (T) You had us draw this symbol and put seven spokes or partitions between the two circles.
Q: (T) Is seven the optimal number?
A: Seven is always the optimal number. There are seven levels of density. This reflects through all phases of reality.
Q: (T) The people that I interacted with during this time, they also have gone on to do other things that they were supposed to be doing because of their interaction with me in this perpendicular reality that we all existed in?
A: That’s correct.
Q: (T) You also said that each of us in this group came from a different perpendicular reality.
A: That is correct.
Q: (T) Is it at this point where we merge our different perpendicular realities in order to learn from each other’s experiences?
A: That could be described as correct.
Q: (L) It was said at the time that the inner circle was the connection with this reality and that the outer circle and connecting segments were where the perpendicular reality is “joined with the wave.” Is it implied in that statement that the forming of this conduit through these perpendicular realities is instrumental in bringing forth this wave, bringing forth this change, this dimensional shift, or density shift, and is that something that is being done in other places?
A: We wish to congratulate you for asking six questions in one. [(T) One more question and you would have a perfect perpendicular question!] Mirth!
Q: (L) Are we connected in some way with the Wave, individually and as a group?
A: Well, of course. Everything is connected to the wave.
Q: (L) Are we, by connecting into this wheel, so to speak, activating the Wave in some way?
A: We are not clear about your interesting interpretation there, but it is true that you have an interactive relationship with the wave… However, as stated before, you are in an interactive relationship with the wave in a sense, in that the wave is a part of your reality, always has been and always will be. And, of course, it does involve your progress through the Grand Cycle. And the perpendicular reality is again, of course, advancement from the core outward, which is yet another reflection of all reality and all that exists. Now, we wish to return to the visual representation as mentioned previously. If you notice the core circle connects with all seven sections to the outer circle. Now, picture that outer circle as being an ever expanding circle, and each one of the seven segments as being an ever-expanding line. Of course, now, this will expand outward in a circular or cyclical pattern. Please picture visually an expanding outer circle and a non-expanding inner circle. Contemplate that and then please give us your feelings as to what that represents.
Q: (L) Does it represent an expansion of our knowledge and consciousness?
A: That’s part of it.
Q: (L) Does it represent also expanding influence of what and who we are on that which is around us?
A: That is correct. Contemplate if you will, the ever-expanding outer circle and the non-expanding inner circle, and of course the seven partitions also moving outwardly. What type of shape does that form in your mind’s eye?
Q: (L) A wheel?
A: Is that all?
Q: (T) A pie?
A: Keep going.
Q: (L) An eye.
A: Now we are starting to turn it into a sphere! Why would it turn into a sphere?
Q: (L) How can it turn into a sphere?
A: How can it not!
Q: (SV) It is going in all directions, not just flat…
A: Is a straight line a straight line or a…
Q: (L) Oh, you’re not talking about a circle?
A: We are talking about a circle. What becomes of a circle if you expand it outward forever?
Q: (J) It disappears.
A: It disappears? How can it disappear? Where does it disappear to? We ask you that, J? J?
Q: (J) Visually, as the outer circle expands, the inner circle becomes smaller and smaller until it disappears. As you continue to expand out with the outer circle, the inner circle disappears.
A: But where does it disappear to?
Q: (J) A black hole?
A: A black hole. Well, that’s a possibility. But, we really didn’t want you to concentrate so heavily on the smaller circle, now did we? It’s the outer circle.
Q: (T) The outer circle is used to encompass more and more.
A: And what shape does it begin to take on? We want you to look at this outer circle expanding outward!
Q: (J) Are we to assume that the seven spokes remain the same size in relation to the circle?
A: Well, answer that question for yourself.
Q: (L) Okay, we are looking at it as a plane representation. As a flat surface.
A: Well, what happens to a flat surface if you extend it outward forever?
Q: (L) Well, we don’t know. That, that… (SV) It keeps on going.
A: It keeps on going?
Q: (L) Yeah, bigger and flatter!
A: It does? What happens to a line if you extend it forever and ever?
Q: (L and S) It keeps on going.
A: It does? Where does it go to?
Q: (SV) Forever. (J) Back to itself. (L) We don’t know that.
A: Oh, someone said “Back to itself.” And why don’t we know that?
Q: (L) Because we don’t. It is conjectured that space is curved…
A: “Because we don’t know.” Now, why don’t we know?
Q: (L) Because we haven’t been there.
A: Had Columbus been outside of Italy and Spain?
Q: (L) Well, of course Columbus had an idea that there was something but he hadn’t been there, no. But he went and checked it out.
A: Did he have just an idea?
Q: (L) Well, pretty much, I guess.
A: Hmmm. That’s not the way we remember it. The way we remember it is that he had instinct and imagination and when he married his instinct with imagination, it became reality. And, when it became reality, he had created a reality which he was fully confident would be manifest in the physical third density reality. It wasn’t that he was confident. He knew it to be so. He didn’t stop himself by adding prejudice to the equation, which is what you are doing when you say: “Well, we don’t know what happens because we have never been there!” Think logically, please. We have told you so many times that everything is a Grand Cycle. If it’s a Grand Cycle, we have told you about circles within circles. We have told you about cycles. We have told you about short wave cycles and long wave cycles. Now, after all this information that you have asked of us, which we have more than happily given to you, would you expect that a straight line would just go out forever and ever and ever as a straight line? How could it possibly do that? What happens, if you take, on your third density earth, and you draw a straight line to the East or to the West or to the North or to the South…?
Q: (J) It comes all the way back to itself.
Q: (L) Okay, so we’re living in a big globe!
A: Are we?
Q: (L) Well, that is what it sounds like, a big circle?
A: Oh, my, my, my. You need more study and learning, my dear. Need more study. Even your Albert Einstein had a theory about what happened.
Q: (L) Yes, but that was just a theory.
A: Oh, well we guess then it must be dropped. We’ll never know. It’s just a theory. Well, we’ll just forget about it.
Q: (T) I’m still expanding the circle… (SV) Me too.
A: Very good, that was the idea. It keeps going and going and going.
Q: (L) Well, mine does too, but it hasn’t come back and met anything. So, what’s the point?
A: Does there need to be a point?
Q: (L) Of course!
A: Who says? We are trying to help you learn. When do you expect to shut down this process?
Q: (J) Never. (L) Gee, I hope never.
A: Then there never is a point!
Q: (J) Point taken! (L) There is no point. [Laughter.] Well, if you expand the circle outward and continue expanding it in all directions, it pulls the seven spokes with it, which encompasses more and more space in a cross section, and then turns that circle, you have a sphere.
A: Precisely. But Laura says that means we are living in a big globe. And, maybe we are.
Q: (T) Well, it wouldn’t be a big globe, so to speak; it would only be a big globe within the circle. If the circle continues to expand, it would just continue to go outward and outward and the globe would become bigger and bigger and bigger… (L) You’re making me nervous… (T) But it goes outward forever… ’cause there is no end to going out…
A: There isn’t?
Q: (SV) Nope.
A: Well, then maybe there’s no beginning.
Q: (T) Well, there wouldn’t be a beginning, just a big, open void. An infinite void…
A: If there’s no end and no beginning, then what do you have?
Q: (L) No point. (J) The here and now.
A: The here and now which are also the future and the past. Everything that was, is, and will be, all at once. This is why only a very few of your third density persons have been able to understand space travel, because even though traveling into space in your third density is every bit as third density as lying on your bed at night in your comfortable home, the time reference is taken away. Something that you hold very close to your bosom as if it were your mother. And, it is the biggest illusion that you have. We have repeatedly told you over and over that there is no time, and yet, of course, you have been so brainwashed into this concept that you cannot get rid of it no matter what you do, now can you? Imagine going out into space. You’d be lost when confronted with reality that everything is completely all at one? Would you not? Picture yourself floating around in space!
Q: (T) Does the sphere keep expanding… as the circle expands and you turn the circle 180 degrees, you get a sphere. As the sphere continues to expand it, you take a point on the outer edge of the sphere in order to take the sphere about itself; you get a donut, an ever-expanding inner tube. If you take that and twist it, you get an even larger inner tube. It just continues to expand and encompasses more space…
A: And now, when you merge densities, or traverse densities, what you have is the merging of physical reality and ethereal reality, which involves thought form versus physicality. When you can merge those perfectly, what you realize then, is that the reason there is no beginning and no end is merely because there is no need for you to contemplate a beginning or an end after you have completed your development. When you are at union with the One at Seventh density, that is when you have accomplished this and then there is no longer any need for difference between physical and ethereal forms.
Q: (SV) I want to ask one question: If there is no time, there is no past and no future; there are no past lives and no future lives, there is no such thing as reincarnation, then how can you be us…
A: Yes, there is reincarnation. You are getting ahead of yourself there. We never said there is no reincarnation.
Q: (SV) But, if there is no time? (J) It is our perception of it. (L) It is all happening simultaneously. We are having all of these lifetimes at once. (SV) Is there a way that we can connect ourselves with all our other selves?
A: Picture it this way: we will access some of your memory banks and give you another reference which, interestingly enough, fits very closely with the perpendicular reality wheel that we described earlier. You know what a slide projector looks like? To give you some feeling of what this expanded nature of reality really is, picture yourself watching a big slide presentation with a big slide wheel on the projector. At any given point along the way you are watching one particular slide. But, all the rest of the slides are present on the wheel, are they not? And, of course, this fits in with the perpendicular reality, which fits in with the circles within circles and cycles within cycles, which also fits in the Grand Cycle, which also fits in with what we have told you before: All there is is lessons. That’s all there is. And we ask that you enjoy them as you are watching the slide presentation…
Q: (J) In that analogy, the light that shines through the slide, as it projects it upon the screen, is our perception.
A: And, if you look back at the center of the projector, you see the origin and essence of all creation itself, which, is Level Seven where you are in union with the One.
Now, let’s go in another direction for a moment. Let’s look at my presentation of Ouspensky’s discussion of the fourth dimension of time, as drawn from his book, Tertium Organum:
We say that space is infinite — that it is illimitable in both scope and direction. (There may be some who postulate an outer limit to space, but what they propose as being outside that limit is an even greater difficulty than that of infinity.) Space, as we perceive it, has only three dimensions: length, width, and height. We define this condition as three independent directions — that is, each measurement lies at right angles to the others simultaneously.
But, this is a contradiction. For, if space is infinite, then it must possess an infinite number of lines perpendicular and not parallel to one another.
Is infinity then foolishness, and does space necessarily have a limit? If it does have a limit, in what space does our space exist? But, if space does possess an infinite number of lines perpendicular to one another, then we must ask why we can only perceive three. If we exist in a condition of mind that perceives only three dimensions, this must mean that the properties of space are created — or differentiated — by certain attributes within us. For some reason or another, the Whole is inaccessible to us.
Ouspensky wrote in an essay in 1908, entitled “The Fourth Dimension”:
We may have very good reason for saying that we are ourselves beings of four dimensions and we are turned towards the third dimension with only one of our sides, i.e., with only a small part of our being. Only this part of us lives in three dimensions, and we are conscious only of this part as our body. The greater part of our being lives in the fourth dimension, but we are unconscious of this greater part of ourselves. Or it would be still more true to say that we live in a four-dimensional world, but are conscious of ourselves only in a three dimensional world.
The fact is, Ouspensky was greatly influenced in his thinking by Charles Howard Hinton, an English mathematician. But, long before Hinton had a clue about the ideas of the “fourth dimension,” there was Georg Bernhard Riemann.
Michio Kaku tells the story in his book Hyperspace: A Scientific Odyssey Through Parallel Universes, Time Warps, and the 10th Dimension (Oxford University Press, 1994) and I have pretty much followed his outline, though reducing the length and complexity of the story.
On June 10, 1854, at the University of Gottingen, Germany, Riemann gave a lecture entitled On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry, sounding the death knell of the classical, linear view of the universe and introduced the theory of higher dimensions. As I have written elsewhere, the prevailing view of physics eventually filters down to affect all our cultural and social interactions, and it was only thirty or so years after Riemann’s talk that the “mysterious fourth dimension” would begin to profoundly affect art, philosophy and literature.
Sixty years after, Einstein used four-dimensional Riemannian geometry to explain the creation of the Universe and its evolution, and 130 years later, physicists would use ten-dimensional geometry to attempt to unite all the laws of the physical universe.
Euclidean geometry holds that space is three dimensional and “flat.” In flat space, angles in a triangle always add to 180 degrees which omits the possibility that space can be curved, as on a sphere. For two thousand years, Euclid was “king” and all of Christendom marveled at his insights. Cathedrals were built and civilizations were born according to the principles of Euclid. Euclid and the Church — strange, but devoted bedfellows.
Most people can remember struggling with the theorems of Euclid: that the circumference of a circle is pi times the diameter, and that parallel lines never intersect. It was always pretty standard stuff except for one little problem that most people aren’t aware of: try as they would for centuries, the greatest mathematicians simply could not prove these deceptively simple propositions. As long as you stayed in “flatland,” you were safe with Euclid. The instant you wandered into curved space, Euclid was your nemesis.
Riemann rebelled against the so-called “mathematical precision” of Euclid, because it was apparent to him that the natural world is not made up of Euclid’s flat, idealized, geometric figures. It was clear that the real world was made up of curves that bend and twist in infinite variety.
Euclid said, “It is obvious” that a point has no dimension at all. A line has one dimension: length. A plane has two dimensions: length and breadth. A solid has three dimensions: length, breadth, and height. And that’s it! There is no more! Nothing has four dimensions, according to Euclid.
Another Greek who has dominated our culture for a very long time, Aristotle, stated categorically that the fourth spatial dimension was impossible. Ptolemy, the Egyptianized Greek went even further and constructed a “proof” that the fourth dimension was impossible. If you draw three mutually perpendicular lines, and then try to draw a fourth line that is perpendicular to the other three lines, you will discover that it is impossible. More than three mutually perpendicular lines are not only impossible to draw, they are impossible to comprehend.
But, what Ptolemy really did was to demonstrate that it is impossible to visualize the fourth dimension with our three-dimensional brains! Today, mathematicians and physicists know that there are many objects that can be shown to exist mathematically, which cannot be visualized.
As Michio Kaku writes, “Ptolemy may go down in history as the man who opposed two great ideas in science: the sun-centered solar system and the fourth dimension.”
It is a curious thing that many mathematicians, obviously deeply influenced by Christianity, and their faith in the Bible as the “True and only word of God,” regularly denounced the idea of the fourth dimension calling it a “monster in nature.” And so, Euclid and the Church dominated our minds, brainwashing humanity into thinking that things cannot exist that we cannot picture in our minds. It was, oddly enough when you consider the purported spiritual goals of religion, a curious descent into gross materialism.
As mentioned, the story of Riemann and how and why he prepared his famous lecture is nicely told in Michio Kaku’s Hyperspace, well worth reading. But, what concerns us here is that Riemann developed the idea of the metric tensor and also was one of the first to discuss multiple connected spaces, or wormholes. To visualize this, take two sheets of paper and place one on top of the other. Make a little cut on each with knife or scissors, and glue the sheets together along the two cuts only. If a bug lives on the top sheet, he may one day accidentally walk into the cut and find himself on the bottom sheet. He will be puzzled because everything is in the wrong place. After much experimentation, the bug may discover that he can re-emerge into his original world by passing again through the cut. As long as he walks around the cut, everything is fine and looks normal, but when he tries to take the short-cut he has a problem.
Lewis Carroll used “Riemann’s cuts” with great effect in his book Through the Looking-Glass. Riemann’s cut is the looking glass.
Soon after Riemann, researchers all over Europe began to popularize the idea of the fourth dimension for the layperson. As it happened, Riemann’s mathematics was so far in advance of the thinking of the day that there was no physical principle to guide further research. It was only after another hundred years had passed that physicists even caught up with him! But, one thing that did happen was the realization that a being from the fourth dimension would have what would seem to us, God-like powers. Kaku writes:
Imagine being able to walk through walls.
You wouldn’t have to bother with opening doors; you could pass right through them. You wouldn’t have to go around buildings; you could enter them through their walls and pillars and out through the back wall. You wouldn’t have to detour around mountains; you could step right into them. When hungry, you could simply reach through the refrigerator door without opening it. You could never be accidentally locked outside your car; you could simply step through the car door.
Imagine being able to disappear or reappear at will.
Instead of driving to school or work, you would just vanish and rematerialize in your classroom or office. You wouldn’t need an airplane to visit far-away places, you could just vanish and rematerialize where you wanted. You would never be stuck in city traffic during rush hours; you and your car would simply disappear and rematerialize at your destination.
Imagine having x-ray eyes.
You would be able to see accidents happening from a distance. After vanishing and rematerializing at the site of any accident, you could see exactly where the victims were, even if they were buried under debris.
Imagine being able to reach into an object without opening it.
You could extract the sections from an orange without peeling or cutting it. You would be hailed as a master surgeon, with the ability to repair the internal organs of patients without ever cutting the skin, thereby greatly reducing pain and the risk of infection. You would simply reach into the person’s body, passing directly through the skin, and perform the delicate operation.
Imagine what a criminal could do with these powers. He could enter the most heavily guarded bank. He could see through the massive doors of the vault for the valuables and case and reach inside and pull them out. He could then stroll outside as the bullets from the guards passed right through him.
With these powers, no prison could hold a criminal. No secrets could be kept from us. No treasures could be hidden from us. No obstructions could stop us. We would truly be miracle workers, performing feats beyond the comprehension of mortals. We would also be omnipotent.
What being could possess such God-like power? The answer: a being from a higher-dimensional world. (emphasis added)
In 1877, a scandal in London brought the idea of the fourth dimension to public awareness in a big way. Kaku relates that a psychic named Henry Slade was holding séances in the homes of prominent people, and was arrested for fraud “using subtle crafts and devices, by palmistry and otherwise.”
Slade was convicted of fraud by the court, but he insisted that he could prove his innocence by duplicating his feats before a scientific commission and Johann Zollner, professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Leipzig, gathered together a group of scientists who were willing to take a scientific look. Their reason for doing so was made public and consisted in declaring that the feats Slade claimed to be doing were, indeed, possible by manipulating objects in the fourth dimension! In so doing, the media coverage gave the public a real idea of just exactly what was possible in this strange world of ours.
Among Slade’s defenders were William Crookes, inventor of the cathode ray tube; Wilhelm Weber, Gauss’s collaborator and the mentor of Riemann; J.J. Thompson, who won the Nobel Prize in 1906 for the discovery of the electron; Lord Rayleigh, one of the greatest classical physicists of the late nineteenth century and winner of the Nobel Prize in 1904. Kaku writes:
First, Slade was given two separate, unbroken wooden rings. Could he push one wooden ring past the other, so that they were intertwined without breaking it? If Slade succeeded, Zollner wrote, it would “represent a miracle, that is, a phenomenon which our conceptions heretofore of physical and organic processes would be absolutely incompetent to explain.”
Second, he was given the shell of a sea snail, which twisted either to the right or to the left. Could Slade transform a right-handed shell into a left-handed shell and vice versa?
Third, he was given a closed loop of rope made of dried animal gut. Could he make a knot in the circular rope without cutting it?
Slade was also given variations of these tests. For example, a rope was tied into a right-handed knot and its ends were sealed with wax and impressed with Zollner’s personal seal. Slade was asked to untie the knot, without breaking the wax seal, and retie the rope in a left-handed knot. Since knots can always be untied in the fourth dimension, this feat should be easy for a fourth-dimensional person. Slade was also asked to remove the contents of a sealed bottle without breaking the bottle.
Could Slade demonstrate this astounding ability?
Today we realize that the manipulation of higher-dimensional space, as claimed by Slade, would require a technology far in advance of anything possible on this planet for the conceivable future. However, what is interesting about this notorious case is that Zollner correctly concluded that Slade’s feats of wizardry could be explained if one could somehow move objects through the fourth dimension.
For example, in three dimensions, separate rings cannot be pushed through each other until they intertwine without breaking them. Similarly, closed, circular pieces of rope cannot be twisted into knots without cutting them. However, in higher dimensions, knots are easily unraveled and rings can be intertwined. This is because there is “more room” in which to move ropes past each other and rings into each other. If the fourth dimension existed, ropes and rings could be lifted off our universe, intertwined, and then returned to our world. In fact, in the fourth dimensions, knots can never remain tied. They can always be unraveled without cutting the rope. This feat is impossible in three dimensions, but trivial in the fourth. The third dimension, as it turns out, is the only dimensions in which knots stay knotted!
Similarly, in three dimensions it is impossible to convert a rigid left-handed object into a right-handed one. Humans are born with hearts on their left side, and no surgeon, no matter how skilled, can reverse human internal organs. This is possible (as first pointed out by mathematician August Mobius in 1827) only if we lift the body out of our universe, rotate it in the fourth dimension, and then reinsert it back into our universe.
Zollner sparked a storm of controversy when, publishing in both the Quarterly Journal of Science and Transcendental Physics, he claimed that Slade amazed his audiences with these “miraculous” feats during séances in the presence of distinguished scientists.
Zollner’s spirited defense of Slade’s feats was sensationalized throughout London society. Supporting Zollner’s claims was his circle of reputable scientists, including Weber and Crookes. These were not average scientists, but masters of the art of science and seasoned observers of experiment. They had spent a lifetime working with natural phenomena, and now before their eyes, Slade was performing feats that were possible only if spirits lived in the fourth dimension.
There were, of course, savage critics and detractors but, in my opinion, none of their arguments hold water. In fact, such evidence has been demonstrated time and again over the centuries, far into the distant past, and there have always been detractors and “savages” criticizing on behalf of their materialist masters or gods.
The interesting thing about Kaku’s descriptions of the abilities of a fourth dimensional being is that they happen to be precisely the type of things that characterize the “alien” phenomenon that interacts with our reality to a greater and greater extent with each passing year. What’s more, there is a great body of evidence that beings with such powers have interacted with humanity for a very long time, though in ages past they were called fairies, demons, vampires, and so forth. Further, these abilities that are being described as “fourth dimensional,” are exactly what the Cassiopaeans term “fourth density,” rather than dimension.
In 1884, after a decade of controversy, Edwin Abbot, headmaster of the City of London School, wrote the novel Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions by a Square. Abbot was a clergyman, which wasn’t too surprising because they now had a “place” to put heaven and hell and angels and demons — in the fourth dimension (which probably wasn’t too far off in terms of accuracy!). The unique thing about Flatland was that is was also a biting satire of social criticism. Abbot poked fun at the pious people who denied the possibility of the fourth dimension. It is a book well worth reading for the many examples it makes of bigotry and narrow mindedness that prevail, even today, in scientific and religious communities.
Flatland paved the way for more artistic fourth dimensional expressions, including works by Oscar Wilde, H.G. Wells, Lewis Carroll, Joseph Conrad and others. The development of many of the occult societies including Theosophy was influenced by the ideas of the fourth dimension. It was, as we could say today, the latest fad of that time.
This had a good side and a bad side. On the bad side, serious scientists distanced themselves from the tabloid-like nature of the subject just as they distance themselves from anything having to do with “aliens” today. On the good side, it became a cultural metaphor. Cubism and Expressionism were influenced by the fourth dimensional non-Euclidean geometries.
Charles Howard Hinton brought the fourth dimension to America. At Oxford, Hinton had been trying to figure out ways to visualize the fourth dimension. As a mathematician, he knew that one cannot visualize a four-dimensional object in its entirety, but you can visualize a cross section of one.
After some personal problems, Hinton came to America, worked for a time at Princeton, and later at the Patent Office in Washington. He spent years developing clever ways for the average person to “see” four-dimensional objects. Eventually, he perfected special cubes that, if one tried hard enough, could allow one to visualize hypercubes, or cubes in four dimensions. These would eventually be called Hinton’s cubes. He coined the name for an “unraveled” hypercube: Tesseract.
Flatlanders cannot visualize a cube, but they can conceptualize a three-dimensional cube by unraveling it. To a Flatlander, a cube, when unfolded, resembles a cross, consisting of six squares as the figure below shows. In the same way, we cannot visualize a four-dimensional hypercube but, if we “unfold” it, we have a series of cubes arranged in a cross like Tesseract. Although this looks like a solid, stable object of three dimensions, the idea is to understand that it is really just our representation of the hypercube which is “wrapped up” in 4-dimensional space the same way the “cross” figure “wraps up” into a cube when going from 2-dimensional space to 3-dimensional space.
As the reader might guess, Hinton’s cubes soon became objects of “mystical importance.” It was claimed that a person could catch glimpses of the fourth dimension by meditating on one of them. His disciples spent hours contemplating these cubes until they attained the ability to mentally rearrange and reassemble them via the fourth dimension into a hypercube. Those who could perform this mental feat, it was said, would attain the highest state of nirvana!
Hinton’s greatest contribution to the matter of the fourth dimension was his popularization of higher dimensional figures. These are useful in many ways because even professional mathematicians conceptualize higher-dimensional objects via their cross sections, their unraveling, and their shadows.
The reader might want to have a look at The Monster from Nowhere by Nelson Bond, which describes how a monster from the fourth dimension might manifest in our own. There are some bizarre descriptions that actually reflect some cases of alien manifestation in our own times.
Now, where are we with all of this?
I think we can understand that everyone has a connection to The Wave, or realm border, via a fourth dimension-like cut or wormhole called a perpendicular reality. Whether they can access it or not is another question. And, whether it needs more than one person to produce or manifest the cut is still another. If the latter idea is correct, we might conjecture that groups of seven individuals, if they are the right seven individuals (determined by each group dynamic) can interact in such a way as to bring exponential knowledge and awareness to each and every member of the group, thereby opening the cut, or wormhole, is a further consideration.
Such groups would be called conduits as the Cassiopaeans have denoted them, and, as we learned earlier, a conduit is a sort of escape hatch that can be activated upon the arrival of The Wave.
But, exactly how might such a thing work? Well, as we went along, more bits and pieces of the puzzle came our way though, at this point, the Santilli session was the last time The Wave was discussed for almost a year. We wouldn’t come back to it until June 1996 when much water had gone over the dam and under the bridge. Changes, changes, changes.1
When it finally was discussed again, it was because I started off with a question about something that was seemingly unrelated. And, in this case, the “wave” that was brought up did not seem, at that moment, to be related to The Wave, as we are discussing it. It was only later that we began to suspect a connection.
Just to give a little background about what prompted the questions that led to the next series of clues, I had purchased a book entitled The Sufi Path of Knowledge by William Chittick at some point simply because I wanted to be better informed about the Sufis as a result of my interest in the writings of Ouspensky and Gurdjieff. I had even asked a bit about Ouspensky’s presentation of second-dimensional awareness relating to what the Cassiopaeans called second density.
February 11, 1995
Q: (L) Earlier we were reading from Ouspensky’s Tertium Organum about perceptions. Was this a fairly accurate description of the state of our perceptions and the state of second density perceptions?
Let me note again that it seems that the mathematical explication of dimensions is more in line with what the Cassiopaeans are describing as densities, while “alternate realities” is more along the line of the popular understanding of dimensions. There is certainly a lot of misunderstanding and misconception out there amongst many New Age gurus regarding these subjects. And, the sad thing is that they use the words without any comprehension of the mathematical precision and deeper meanings, and many people are being fed a load of hooey with these “word salads.” At the same time, there are many who have the understanding, but haven’t got the proper vocabulary to express it, and thus the conflict between inspired perception and science is endlessly perpetuated. But, that’s a story for another time.
During and after the period of deep level change in my own life, I have to admit that I was really pretty angry with the Cassiopaeans. I mean, here they were, supposedly sixth density light beings who had been chatting with us for some time, who, one would think, could advise me in ways that would prevent pain and suffering, or dire and dreadful events, and all I had experienced from the moment I began to put their suggestions into effect was constant, unmitigated attack on my psyche, my person, and even my family. I complained to them one night:
February 11, 1996
Q: (L) I have written to a lot of people… When am I going to find what I am looking for?
A: Did we not tell you, did we not advise you about the network??!??
Q: (L) Of course…
A: And what did you do?
Q: (L) Well, I got online as soon as I could…
A: And what happened?
Q: (L) The Lizzies tried to kill me! [laughter]
A: The Lizard Force, i.e. STS, has been attacking you since day one. We have been advising you only for 1.5 years, as you measure it.
Q: (L) The situation is such that I am running out of force from working against this constant oppression and opposition. Can you tell me if I will ever have some peace of mind so that I can continue to function?
A: Have we?
And, they had… in many subtle ways. The only problem was, it was never specific. It was like being told there was a treasure in a labyrinth that I was supposed to find, and being put into it blindfolded. Sure, the Cassiopaeans were there on the side sort of whispering, “You’re getting warm now! Oops! You’re cold… colder… ICE cold…! Okay, yes… getting warm… warmer… hot, hot!”
But, that was something of a crazy way to live. I didn’t realize at the time that they were teaching me to discern things in a way and at a level that is rarely accessed by even those who spend their lives in the realms of metaphysics and the paranormal. I was just frustrated and angry like a child who was having a hard time doing math, not realizing how valuable the practice lessons would become.
But, it was a process that seemed to be taking forever. Several months went by with no sessions because I was ill or depressed or just too tired to make the effort. When we finally did have another session at one point, I complained again:
June 1, 1996
Q: (L) Several people have pointed out to me, only since we have begun this channeling project that all these dreadful things have happened in my life. My life is a shambles!
A: “Dreadful is subjective.”
Q: (L) I would say that the physical things that have happened to me, the collapse of my marriage, the things that have happened to my children, are pretty damn dreadful, subjectively or otherwise!
A: Before these changes began to manifest, you were deeper into the “deadly illusion” than you are now. Emergence is, by its very nature, uncomfortable. But, it has and will, empower you, we promise!!!!!!!!
Q: (L) It is a very trying time now. I am having a difficult time just coping.
A: And there have been others, and will be others, but that does not mean that the rewards will be slight. You are on a path of destiny, and there is no turning back now.
In the frame of mind I was, that sounded foreboding! I had no enthusiasm for anything, and I was in a constant state of physical crisis from one illness after another. But, during the periods of sickness or tiredness and/or depression, I began to idly flip through this book on the teachings of Muhyi al-Din Muhammad ibn-‘Ali ibn al-‘Arabi which had sat unopened on the shelf for a couple of years.
As I began to read bits and pieces, I was stunned at the similarity of the teachings to what the Cassiopaeans had been saying. I was also pretty excited to find that the very things I was suffering were not unusual for someone who was receiving what was called an “unveiling.” This gave me the heart to decide on another session at which the following exchange took place:
June 15, 1996
Q: (L) As you know, I have been studying the Sufi teachings, and I am discovering so many similarities in these Sufi “unveilings” to what we have been receiving through this source, that I am really quite amazed, to say the least. So, my question is: could what we are doing here be considered an ongoing, incremental, “unveiling,” as they call it?
Q: (L) Now, from what I am reading, in the process of unveiling, at certain points, when the knowledge base has been sufficiently expanded, inner unveilings then begin to occur. Is this part of the present process?
Q: (L) My experience has been, over the past couple of years, that whenever there is a significant increase in knowledge, that it is sort of cyclical — I go through a depression before I can assimilate — and it is like an inner transformation from one level to another. Is there something we can do, and if so, is it desirable, to increase or facilitate this process in some way?
A: It is a natural process, let it be.
Q: (L) One of the things that Al-‘Arabi writes about is the ontological levels of being. Concentric circles, so to speak, of states of being. And each state defines relationships in terms of knowledge and awareness. At each higher level you are closer to a direct relationship with the core of existence, and on the outer edges, you are in closer relationship with matter. This pretty well explicates the seven densities you have described for us and he says there are seven also. He also talks about the “outraying” and the “inward moving” toward knowledge. My thought was that certain beings, such as fourth density STS, and other STS beings of third density, who think that they are creating a situation where they will accrue power to themselves, may, in fact, be part of the “outraying” or dispersion into matter. Is this a correct perception?
Q: (L) Al-‘Arabi says, and this echoes what you have said, that you can stay in the illusion where you are, you can move downward or upward. Is this, in part, whichever direction you choose, a function of your position on the cycle?
A: It is more complex than that.
Q: (L) Well, I am sure of that. Al-‘Arabi presents a very complex analysis and he probably didn’t know it all either… Nevertheless, it almost word-for-word reflects things that have been given directly to us through this source.
A: Now, learn, read, research all you can about unstable gravity waves.
Q: (L) Okay. Unstable gravity waves. I’ll see what I can find. Is there something more about this?
A: Meditate too!
Q: (L) Yes. Well, they have been telling us to meditate. Have you been meditating, Frank? (F) Not lately.
A: We mean for you, Laura, to meditate about unstable gravity waves as part of research. Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics to make the picture crystal clear.
Q: (L) Gravity seems to be a property of matter. Is that correct?
A: And… antimatter!
Q: (L) Is the gravity that is a property of antimatter “antigravity?” Or, is it just gravity on the other side, so to speak?
A: Binder. Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity waves!!!
Q: (L) Is antimatter what we refer to as “ethereal” existence?
A: Pathway to. Doorway to.
Q: (L) Do unstable gravity waves emanate from seventh density?
A: Throughout. There is no emanation point.
Q: (L) So, they are a property or attribute of the existence of matter, and the binder of matter to ethereal ideation?
A: Sort of, but they are a property of anti-matter, too!
Q: (L) So, through unstable gravity waves, you can access other densities?
Q: (L) Can you generate them mechanically?
A: Generation is really collecting and dispersing.
Q: (L) Okay, what kind of a device would collect and disperse gravity waves? Is this what spirals do?
A: On the way to. When you wrote Noah [The Noah Syndrome] where did you place gravity?
Q: (L) I thought that gravity was an indicator of the consumption of electricity; that gravity was a byproduct of a continuous flow of electrical energy…
A: Gravity is no byproduct! It is the central ingredient of all existence!
Q: (L) I was evaluating by electric flow and consumption… and I was thinking that electricity was evidence of some sort of consciousness, and that gravity was evidence that a planet that had it, had life…
A: We have told you before that planets and stars are windows. And where does the gravity go?
Q: (L) Well, where does gravity go? The sun is a window. Even our planet must be a window!
A: You have it too!! Gravity is all there is.
Q: (L) Is light the emanation of gravity?
Q: (L) What is light?
A: Gravity. Gravity is “God.”
Q: (L) But, I thought God was light?
A: If gravity is everything, what isn’t it? Light is energy expression generated by gravity. Please name something that is not gravity.
Q: (L) Well, if gravity is everything, there is nothing that is not gravity, well, fine! What is absolute nothingness?
A: A mere thought.
Q: (L) So, there is no such thing as non-existence?
A: Yes, there is.
Q: (L) Do thoughts produce gravity?
Q: (L) Does sound produce gravity?
Q: (L) Can sound manipulate gravity?
Q: (L) Can it be done with the human voice?
Q: (L) Can it be done tonally or by power through thought?
A: Both. Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound, which manipulates gravity.
A: No. He spun when gravity chose to manipulate him to spin in order to manipulate gravity.
Q: (L) Does gravity have consciousness?
Q: (L) Is it ever possible for the individual to do the choosing, or is it gravity that is him that chose?
A: The gravity that was inside him was all the gravity in existence.
Q: (L) Well, I thought the Sufis were tough! (F) Well, it’s probably because of your studies that this door opened. (L) Good grief! What have I done! All right. I am confused.
A: No you are not.
Q: (L) Then, just put it this way: I am befuddled and overloaded.
A: Befuddling is fun!
Q: (L) Well, I guess that if any of this is going to be of particular significance to us, then we will certainly find out the details as we go along.
A: How many times do we have to tell you?!?! The entire sum total of all existence exists within each of you, and vice versa.
Q: (L) Then what is the explanation for the “manyness” that we perceive?
A: Perception of 3rd density.
Q: (L) So, the entire universe is inside me… Okay, that’s… I understand. Oddly enough, I do. The problem is accessing it, stripping away the veils.
A: That is the fun part.
Q: (L) So, the fellow who built the Coral Castle was able to access this. Consistently or only intermittently?
Q: (L) According to what I understand, at the speed of light, there is no mass, no time, and no gravity. How can this be?
A: No mass, no time, but yes, gravity.
Q: (L) A photon has gravity?
A: Gravity supercedes light speed.
Q: (L) Gravity waves are faster than light?
Q: (L) What would make a gravity wave unstable?
Q: (L) I feel like I am missing a really big point here…
A: You are, but you can only find it at your own pace. And on that note, good night.
By this time, all of those who have thought, from time to time, that I am a little slow on the uptake, are convinced of it! It is true that I had read and studied for many years to discover the secrets of our existence in this world, and I had thought, at one time, I had a pretty good handle on all of it for a layperson. Now, all of that was just being tossed out the window and I was back in first grade, or so it seemed. And, in this school, I was apparently not the brightest student!
There are a number of points in this last session that strike me (in retrospect, of course!) as being worthy of keeping in mind as we go along in solving this puzzle of how to get out of Oz and back to Kansas, and they are:
Unstable gravity waves unlock as yet unknown secrets of quantum physics to make the picture crystal clear.
Gravity seems to be a property of matter and antimatter! Antimatter is the pathway or doorway to “ethereal” existence. Gravity binds all that is physical with all that is ethereal through unstable gravity waves!!!
Thus, through unstable gravity waves, you can access not only other densities, but also everything else.
Mechanical “generation” of gravity waves is really collecting and dispersing.
Spirals are “On the way to” a mechanical means of collecting and dispersing gravity waves.
Gravity is the central ingredient of all existence! You have it too!!
Thoughts produce gravity. And, by relation, so does knowledge and awareness. Remembering, of course, that knowledge and awareness are the “keys” to forming a conduit, and we think that a “conduit” is a Perpendicular Reality, or something similar to Riemann’s Cut, or a Wormhole.
I don’t know if you, the reader, are thinking what I am thinking about all of this, but keep the above in mind as we continue to try to discover the nature of The Wave and how best to be prepared to interact with it to our benefit.
1 It was during this period that I asked my ex for a divorce and Tom French has described my condition quite well in his article. The interested reader can find the piece on the Times website at www.sptimes.com.
2 Coral Castle was built in the early 20th century by an eccentric Latvian recluse named Edward Leedskalnin . Edward Leedskalnin was a 100 pound, 5 foot tall man — who wound up in Homestead, Florida — on a ten-acre tract of land just south of Miami, Florida. Somehow he managed to single-handedly lift and maneuver blocks of coral weighing up to 30 tons each and create not only a castle but other things. How Edward did his work has never been discovered, though he labored for 30 years. He worked alone — at night — and seemed to know when he was being watched. On those occasions — he never lifted any of the stones. Many articles claim that he found the same secrets of levitation as those used by the supposed builders of the Pyramids of Egypt — among other megalithic sites around the world whose creation remain unexplained.
Edward Leedskalnin was quoted as saying, “I have discovered the secrets of the pyramids, and have found out how the Egyptians and the ancient builders in Peru, Yucatan, and Asia, with only primitive tools, raised and set in place blocks of stone weighing many tons!”
In total, Edward quarried over eleven hundred tons of coral rock for his castle, using tools fashioned from wrecking-yard junk, never revealing how he managed to raise, and position, the massive coral blocks that make up the compound.